Main Menu |
|
Most Favorited Images |
|
Recently Uploaded Images |
|
Most Liked Images |
|
Top Reviewers |
| cockalatte |
650 |
| MoneyManMatt |
490 |
| Jon Bon |
408 |
| Still Looking |
399 |
| samcruz |
399 |
| Harley Diablo |
377 |
| honest_abe |
362 |
| DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
| Starscream66 |
290 |
| Chung Tran |
288 |
| lupegarland |
287 |
| George Spelvin |
286 |
| nicemusic |
285 |
| You&Me |
281 |
| sharkman29 |
260 |
|
|
Top Posters |
| DallasRain | 71094 | | biomed1 | 65547 | | Yssup Rider | 61777 | | gman44 | 54095 | | LexusLover | 51038 | | offshoredrilling | 49171 | | WTF | 48267 | | pyramider | 46388 | | bambino | 43480 | | The_Waco_Kid | 38559 | | CryptKicker | 37338 | | Mokoa | 36497 | | Chung Tran | 36100 | | Still Looking | 35944 | | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
08-29-2017, 10:03 AM
|
#1
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Trump rolled back regulations to protect infrastructure from flooding just days before Harvey...
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post |
|
08-29-2017, 10:06 AM
|
#2
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
|
had zero effect
just more blather
are you the contractor they talk about?
"much of the federal money sent to Texas will likely be wasted on construction that will be insufficiently protected from the next storm."
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
08-29-2017, 10:08 AM
|
#3
|
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,777
|
Not yet.
And you haven answered my question, Herr Dipschitt!
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
08-29-2017, 10:14 AM
|
#4
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
had zero effect
just more blather
are you the contractor they talk about?
"much of the federal money sent to Texas will likely be wasted on construction that will be insufficiently protected from the next storm."
|
Did you read the article? ....it is about future effect.
.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
08-29-2017, 10:17 AM
|
#5
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Did you read the article? ....it is about future effect.
.
|
I quoted it dummie
it had zero effect and will have only bad effect and only beneficial ones going forward
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
08-29-2017, 11:46 AM
|
#6
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
had zero effect
just more blather
are you the contractor they talk about?
"much of the federal money sent to Texas will likely be wasted on construction that will be insufficiently protected from the next storm."
|
+1
The Odumbo regulation would have required that federal money be spent for an "intensive study" by a "bureaucratic panel of experts" on whether or not federally funded infrastructure, such as I-10 running through Houston, should be repaired or abandoned because it might (probably will be) be inundated by future floods and hurricanes.
The notion that "study and analysis" is needed to consider whether the interstate system in Houston should not be repaired is completely preposterous.
|
|
|
Quote
| 3 users liked this post |
|
08-29-2017, 12:26 PM
|
#7
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
+1
The Odumbo regulation would have required that federal money be spent for an "intensive study" by a "bureaucratic panel of experts" on whether or not federally funded infrastructure, such as I-10 running through Houston, should be repaired or abandoned because it might (probably will be) be inundated by future floods and hurricanes.
The notion that "study and analysis" is needed to consider whether the interstate system in Houston should not be repaired is completely preposterous.
|
That is not so.
I was going to require a higher standard.
It would determine if it would continue to pay to rebuild homes that are continually being flooded.
.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
08-29-2017, 12:30 PM
|
#8
|
|
Ambassador
Join Date: Sep 23, 2012
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 13,233
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
The Odumbo regulation would have required that federal money be spent for an "intensive study" by a "bureaucratic panel of experts" on whether or not federally funded infrastructure, such as I-10 running through Houston, should be repaired or abandoned because it might (probably will be) be inundated by future floods and hurricanes.
The notion that "study and analysis" is needed to consider whether the interstate system in Houston should not be repaired is completely preposterous.
|
Cause who needs an expert opinion on anything when you have Trump, right IB?
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
08-29-2017, 12:43 PM
|
#9
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 6, 2010
Location: Ikoyi Club 1938
Posts: 7,141
|
Flooding from Liberal Tears.
#election2016
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
08-29-2017, 12:44 PM
|
#10
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCM800
Cause who needs an expert opinion on anything when you have Trump, right IB?
|
You don't need to spend taxpayer dollars on bureaucrats to study the proposition that I-10 is going to be wholly abandoned because it's subject to being flooded again, 1-800-JCM-DATO.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
08-29-2017, 01:17 PM
|
#11
|
|
Ambassador
Join Date: Sep 23, 2012
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 13,233
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You don't need to spend taxpayer dollars on bureaucrats to study the proposition that I-10 is going to be wholly abandoned because it's subject to being flooded again, 1-800-JCM-DATO.
|
Cause taxpayer money is much better spent on rally tours, right IB?
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
08-29-2017, 01:37 PM
|
#12
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
You hypocritical dim-retards are the last fucking cock-suckers that can complain about "campaign tours" after what Odumbo did, 1-800-JCM-DATO.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
08-29-2017, 01:44 PM
|
#13
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 24, 2013
Location: Aqui !
Posts: 8,942
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You hypocritical dim-retards are the last fucking cock-suckers that can complain about "campaign tours" after what Odumbo did, 1-800-JCM-DATO.
|
" campaign tours " or apology tours !!!!
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
08-29-2017, 01:52 PM
|
#14
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Aug 20, 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 778
|
If there has been no detectable effects of climate change on sea level, and the number and intensity of hurricanes in the gulf of Mexico has been diminished in the past 20 years, what sort of study is needed?
Quote:
The Obama-era rules, which had not yet gone into effect, would have required the federal government to take into account the risk of flooding and sea-level rise as a result of climate change when constructing new infrastructure and rebuilding after disasters.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
08-29-2017, 01:56 PM
|
#15
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Aug 20, 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 778
|
Who was going to get paid to do the study? How much had they contributed to the politicians who were imposing and spending my money on the study?
What sort of government funded conferences and grants have been rewarded to the people/organizations proffering the study.
It is relatively easy to follow the money trail in this sort of thing. Why doesn't the media follow it?
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
|
Find Ladies |
|
Hot Women |
|
