George Soros Buys Local DAs

[UHOR]

Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Well THOR has returned, he's now UHOR, So you can continue to marvel over his incoherent bullshit.


Jim

Originally Posted by WTF

lustylad can rtm T H O R and snitch him out!


.

That they are whore to you ..

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

Do you only have a problem with it when it comes from the left?

If so...

Originally Posted by WTF

Yes a hypocrite... for not calling out all soft money just the soft money from the left.

There you go again, fagboy... attributing to me something I never said.

I like the way you eased into it this time - first, you ask me a question, then you presume to answer it for me!

Listen up, fucktard - go back and read my posts in this thread. Nowhere do I say I have a "problem" with any kind of legal political contribution. What I did say is look how stupid and laughable the libtards are! For years, they've been whining and moaning about the 2009 Citizens United decision - you know, the one you can't remember because you never read it, but like the vacuous and obedient little libtard you are, you dutifully picked up on how to use it as a talking point.

Well, guess what? Trump just threw all your silly libtard tears back at you! Citizens United didn't stop hildebeest from raising and spending TWICE AS MUCH as Trump did in 2016 - and the bitch STILL LOST!

So, the bottom line is - 1) Citizens United didn't put the dimotards at a funding disadvantage (say "thank you, George Soros") and 2) you dimotards grossly exaggerated the importance of money in swinging elections.

Of course, it comes as no surprise to the rest of us that you dimotards can't spend money efficiently. We've been watching how you piss away our tax dollars for decades!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Nowhere do I say I have a "problem" with any kinds of legal political contribution. What I did say is look how stupid and laughable the libtards are! For years, they've been whining and moaning about the 2009 Citizens United decision - you know, the one you can't remember because you never read it, but like the vacuous and obedient little libtard you are, you dutifully picked up on how to use it as a talking point.

Well guess what? Trump just threw all your silly tears back at you! Citizens United didn't stop hildebeest from raising and spending twice as much as Trump did in 2016 - and the bitch STILL LOST!

So, the bottom line is - 1) Citizens United didn't put the dimotards at a funding disadvantage (say "thank you, George Soros") and 2) you dimotards grossly exaggerated the importance of money in swinging elections.

Of course, it comes as no surprise to the rest of us that you dimotards can't spend money efficiently. We've been watching how you piss away our taxpayer money for decades!

+1

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

If you give money, you should not be able to hide that fact.

Wrong again, fagboy.

Everyone should be able to keep their contributions to certain PACs and issue advocacy groups confidential! Everyone has the right to make it as hard as possible for SNITCHFUCKS like you to find out things that are none of your business!

[Yssup Rider]

Typical IBIdiot and his sidekick, IBJunior, dripping the spite fantastic.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

There you go again, fagboy... attributing to me something I never said.

I like the way you eased into it this time - first, you ask me a question, then you presume to answer it for me!

Listen up, fucktard - go back and read my posts in this thread. Nowhere do I say I have a "problem" with any kind of legal political contribution. What I did say is look how stupid and laughable the libtards are! For years, they've been whining and moaning about the 2009 Citizens United decision - you know, the one you can't remember because you never read it, but like the vacuous and obedient little libtard you are, you dutifully picked up on how to use it as a talking point.

Well, guess what? Trump just threw all your silly libtard tears back at you! Citizens United didn't stop hildebeest from raising and spending TWICE AS MUCH as Trump did in 2016 - and the bitch STILL LOST!

So, the bottom line is - 1) Citizens United didn't put the dimotards at a funding disadvantage (say "thank you, George Soros") and 2) you dimotards grossly exaggerated the importance of money in swinging elections.

Of course, it comes as no surprise to the rest of us that you dimotards can't spend money efficiently. We've been watching how you piss away our tax dollars for decades!

To say one election validates Citizens United shows your ignorance.

Next you will say a Roosters crow is responsible for the morning sun...

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

+1

minus 2 , lustylad is lying

Originally Posted by lustylad

Wrong again, fagboy.

Everyone should be able to keep their contributions to certain PACs and issue advocacy groups confidential! Everyone has the right to make it as hard as possible for SNITCHFUCKS like you to find out things that are none of your business!

No , everyone should not be able to keep their contributions hidden you snitching (T H O R) hypocrite.

Every politician should have to document where their funding comes from. I want to know if Soros or the Koch Brothers or any other special interest group are funding a candidate.

It is then up to the public to make an informed decision you Facist loon. Why the fuck you want hidden money in politics is beyond me. Maybe you want Putin funding our elections.

[Yssup Rider]

No, he just wants to call people names, like fagboi.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

To say one election validates Citizens United shows your ignorance.

...lustylad is lying.

You're doing it again, you insufferable idiot! I never said that! Elections don't "validate" SCOTUS cases! They're validated because they are voted by a majority of the justices on the Court and are backed up by written opinions that you're too stupid to comprehend!

Of course, the election would have invalidated you, asswipe, hildebeest and your whiny libtard talking points... but only if you dipshits had any validity to start with (you didn't).

[Yssup Rider]

That's not even English, idiotboi!

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

Every politician should have to document where their funding comes from... Why the fuck you want hidden money in politics is beyond me. Maybe you want Putin funding our elections.

Hey douchebag, all direct contributions to candidates already ARE disclosed. Corporations, unions and foreign citizens can't make them. We're talking about PACs and issue advocacy groups.

And we're on to you, fagboy. Everyone knows your whining about "hidden money" is a cover. You're just a despicable little snitchfuck who wants a list of names so you can send your antifa thugs out to shit on the front lawns of anyone you disagree with.

Brendan Eich/Mozilla was just the start for you goddam neo-fascists. Next you'll want to eliminate the secret ballot.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

. We're talking about PACs and issue advocacy groups.

.

Which is the new big problem....you T H O R snitching hypocrite. He is gonna beat your ass next time he is in Pissburg!

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

I never said that! Elections don't "validate" SCOTUS cases!

That is exactly wtf you implied. You lying , snitching hypocrite.

Originally Posted by lustylad

Citizens United didn't stop hildebeest from raising and spending TWICE AS MUCH as Trump did in 2016 - and the bitch STILL LOST!

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by WTF

No , everyone should not be able to keep their contributions hidden you snitching (T H O R) hypocrite.

Every politician should have to document where their funding comes from. I want to know if Soros or the Koch Brothers or any other special interest group are funding a candidate.

It is then up to the public to make an informed decision you Facist loon. Why the fuck you want hidden money in politics is beyond me. Maybe you want Putin funding our elections.

I agree. NO politician should be able to hide where his (or her) contributions come from. NONE.

Hey douchebag, all direct contributions to candidates already ARE disclosed. Corporations, unions and foreign citizens can't make them. We're talking about PACs and issue advocacy groups.

And why should PAC's and advocacy groups be special in being allowed to remain hidden, WHEN THEIR donations often are the MOST those politicians get?

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

Which is the new big problem....

It's not new and it's not a big problem. It didn't hurt hildebeest - and her party was the one whining about it. Besides, how would you recruit and pay your army of antifa thugs without Soros' money?

Originally Posted by WTF

That is exactly wtf you implied.

Wrong, snitchfuck. Invalidating a whiny, annoying libtard talking point - that Citizens United gave the GOP an unfair funding advantage - is not the same as validating a SCOTUS opinion. You need to spend less time snitching and more time validating the First Amendment, you ignorant fuck!

[Yssup Rider]

I don't think it gave anyone an unfair funding advantage. It put the public at a disadvantage. It put all the power into the hands of a small group of gazillionaires who don't give a flying fuck about any of us.

Why you guys can't understand that is unfathomable.

You think these folks care about YOU Junior?