Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad
Hahahaha... now you're not just rewriting history, you're making it up wholesale!
|
I did not rewrite history. You changed the sentence around (from Post #95) to exclude investment banks and you think you're schooling someone. The 5th, 4th and 3rd largest investment banks were either bankrupt or bought out before the first TARP loans were made. Bear Stearns was the 5th largest investment bank, Lehman was 4th and Merrill Lynch was the 3rd largest. When Paulsen made the first TARP loans all the banks were suffering.
From the link.
https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/fina...risis-overview
Bear Stearns was the 5th largest
investment bank in the US and after it failed, the 4th biggest bank (Lehman Brothers) was under intense pressure. Over the summer of 2008 the share price of Lehman went on a rollercoaster ride, often gaining or losing 40% or more in a single
trading day. All the while, Lehman was hemorrhaging money and needed capital desperately. There was a lot of communication between bank CEO's, Henry Paulson (US Treasury Secretary) and the Federal Reserve in order to try and prevent a crisis.
Lehman tried many different things; a capital raise of $4 billion, a deal with
Morgan Stanley, a deal with
Bank of America, a merger with
Barclays but none of it worked. Everything came to a head in September 2008. Lehman Brothers was intending to do a deal with
Bank of America for the entire company, but the US government refused to provide any kind of support following the public outcry after the
Bear Stearns bailout.
All the banks were suffering at this point but the worst affected after Lehman was the 3rd biggest bank,
Merrill Lynch. Although
Merrill was not widely publicized in the media as being in trouble, it too was losing money and if Lehman failed,
Merrill would be next. During September 2008 the US Treasury orchestrated meetings between all the CEOs of the large banks at the Federal Reserve in order to try and save Lehman Brothers. During these meetings, the government reiterated its position of not providing any form of assistance and insisting that there had to be a market solution similar to that of
Long Term Capital Management in the 1990s.