Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Oinkboy is too stupid to remember, but Podhoretz is one of the authors who contributed to the National Review critique of Trump last January. Oinkboy gleefully started a thread so everyone could read the anti-Trump conservative essays.
So why is the pig snicking?
He had nothing of substance to say last January. And he has nothing of substance to say now.
Oinkboy is too stupid to remember, but Podheretz is one of the authors who contributed to the National Review critique of Trump last January. Oinkboy gleefully started a thread on this so everyone could read the anti-Trump conservative essays.
So why is the pig snicking?
He had nothing of substance to say last January. And he has nothing of substance to say now.
Oinkboy is too stupid to remember, but Podhoretz is one of the authors who contributed to the National Review critique of Trump last January. Oinkboy gleefully started a thread so everyone could read the anti-Trump conservative essays.
So why is the pig snicking?
He had nothing of substance to say last January. And he has nothing of substance to say now.
SNICK, SNICK!
OINK, OINK!
The idiot pig didn't know Trump had over 2 billion dollars in free airtime. What a fraud and loser.
No, oinkboy has never added any substance to any conversation. As for Podhoretz, he is always fun to read. I don't want to hijack this thread, but here is how he sized up Trump in National Review:
Donald Trump is the apotheosis of a tendency that began to manifest itself in American culture in the 1980s, most notably in the persons of the comic Andrew Dice Clay and the shock jock Howard Stern: the American id. Guys like the Dice Man and Stern had been told and taught and trained by respectable middlebrow culture to believe that their tastes and desires were piggish and thuggish and gross, and they said: So be it! Clay filled stadiums across the country with young men who chanted dirty nursery rhymes along with him. Stern invited young actresses onto his show to discuss their breasts. The screams of outrage that greeted them were part of the act. Clay had nowhere to go with his shtick after a few years and faded away. Stern adapted to changing circumstances. But the American id remained, as ids do. You want to call me a goon? Fine, so I’ll act like a goon, see how you like it.
The cultural signposts Trump brandished in the years preceding his presidential bid are all manifestations of the American id — his steak business, his casino business, his green-marble-and-chrome architecture, his love life minutely detailed in the columns of Cindy Adams, his involvement with Vince McMahon’s wrestling empire, and his reality-TV persona as the immensely rich guy who treats people like garbage but has no fancy airs. This id found its truest voice in his repellent assertion that the first black president needed to prove to Trump’s satisfaction that he was actually an American.
In any integrated personality, the id is supposed to be balanced by an ego and a superego — by a sense of self that gravitates toward behaving in a mature and responsible way when it comes to serious matters, and, failing that, has a sense of shame about transgressing norms and common decencies. Trump is an unbalanced force. He is the politicized American id. Should his election results match his polls, he would be, unquestionably, the worst thing to happen to the American common culture in my lifetime.
The idiot pig didn't know Trump had over 2 billion dollars in free airtime. What a fraud and loser.
Yeah, the pig pretends to have intellectual gravitas. Then we discover he doesn't even keep up with the liberal New York Times, let alone the conservative National Review.
His only "card" is to pretend he has acquired personal information about posters by innuendo and suggestive remarks with the veiled threat of disclosure in a public forum .... he perceives it gives him "leverage" and "superior status"!
His only "card" is to pretend he has acquired personal information about posters by innuendo and suggestive remarks with the veiled threat of disclosure in a public forum .... he perceives it gives him "leverage" and "superior status"!
He's not alone in his self-delusion.
Yeah, he's like the Bulgarian Cocksucker. He would ask hookers in Pgh about other hobbyists. He outed a few people. He finally got banned for life. Asswipes just like him.
The Republican establishment attempted to push the party toward Jeb Bush but most conservatives wouldn't have him. Many knew he couldn't win.(He spent over $100 million to come in last.) Republican voters chose the one candidate the party shunned. In short, the party thought they could put their guy in front of their mindless voters and they would accept him. They were wrong.
The DNC chose Hillary as their candidate. Leaked emails prove this was the case all along. I personally believe they pushed Bernie only because, next to Bernie, Hillary doesn't look as bad. (I do think they were surprised how many actually chose Bernie over Hillary.) The Democratic Party thought they could their candidate in front of their mindless voters and they would accept her. They were mostly right.
I realized in November of 2015 that all but two of the Republican candidates could thoroughly stomp HRC in an election (even then, I had no doubt about her nomination). Jeb Bush and Donald Trump were the only 2 candidates she cold èven hope to beat. I believe the media covered Trump so much to ensure his nomination to give Hillary even the slightest chance.
Even with the game totally stacked in her favor (to include hand selecting her opponents to give her the best chance possible) she still only leads the most liberal polls by a slim margin.
I do understand some Democrats actually want her to be president. I understand women who are voting for the female just because they think it's time. But anyone else who thinks they "chose" her is sadly mistaken. She was chosen by the party and for the party.
This sums up the Libtard conundrum
