Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Hey IIFFy, you are as clueless as every, aren't you.
Tell me, in two sentences or less--what that video has to do with the DC Madem? Just wondering. If you can make a compelling case I promise I will actually watch it.
Quote:
you are as clueless as every, aren't you.
Old-Turkeytard the TRUMP train is leaving without you...
Hey IIFFy, you are as clueless as every, aren't you.
Tell me, in two sentences or less--what that video has to do with the DC Madem? Just wondering. If you can make a compelling case I promise I will actually watch it.
Aren't you "the one" with "friends in high places"?
So I admit I learned a lot listening to that video clip, IIFFy. If we would only have the list released, we would zero out the national debt! Wow, I never realized that.
But being serious for a moment (I know that is hard to imagine on this form) the rest of this is addressed to a wider audience on here. I am sure those it applies to can recognize themselves. What is you fixation with the list--other than proving that many of you are full-fledged hypocrites about your advocacy for privacy. Every one of you applauding the hopefully-soon (in your sick minds) release of the list are posting on an escort board if I have this right. So which of you are going to drop your stupid handles and start posting under your real name and real phone/e-mail? If you are such zealots for openness, then start with yourselves you blithering assholes. But no, most of you are pathetic losers who probably only get an erection when you see someone else get publicly flogged for what you wish you could still do.
Yes, if the list is released all you pathetic carrion birds will chortle and cluck for days. And it won't make any of the five remaining candidates a better or worse option for president.
Yes, there are some "interesting" names on that list. Yes, people will be hurt. There are liberals on the list, there are conservatives on the list. There are at least three who in the past couple months have contacted the ladies they saw via Palfrey to find out if the women will corroborate the list or not. (All three ladies have enough moral character to say they will not. One actually served 60 days contempt of court for not revealing anything during the Palfrey trial. I know two were offered $$$ but have turned it down.)
Another one I am pretty sure will not corroborate the names because she has been married to the former client for a decade.
There are a few dead people on the list as well--so the only people who will be hurt in that case are the living family members. But what is a little gratuitous pain to innocent people so long as parasites like you have an opportunity to post more homophobic and bestiality jokes.
What a fine upstanding bunch you are. But then I am not telling you anything you don't already know.
Carry on assholes.
PS: No, my name/number is not on the list. But I do know a number of ladies who had the misfortune to work for that wicked witch of the west, and I know a far number of the names that were on the list but have not been released--so I assume they will be in this segment.
I think this is one area where conservative and liberals, Republicans and Democrats on this board should be able to agree. Girls in this business should not have to suffer, and it is dishonorable to release the names on those lists.
Myself, I never use my real name with the girls, use a burner email, and I treat the girls really well, at least to the best of my ability.
We should ignore such lists or denounce them as fraudulent/hearsay, and certainly not condemn anyone seeking to have sex with pretty women.
Who wouldn't want to have sex with a pretty woman, or even several at once?
