Yertle the Turtle on the upcoming SCOTUS nomination

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Here are the two first articles that started your strawman rant, as you can see there never was a timeline stated, Now STFY and stand in your corner.
http://k2radio.com/u-w-law-prof-dela...rly-two-years/
http://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/...rt-nomination/

That would be a picture of your dumb-ass, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, because you'd be the jackass insisting that there is a time line for the Senate to follow when the Constitution does not, in fact, dictate or prescribe a timeline for Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

That would be a picture of your dumb-ass, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, because you'd be the jackass insisting that there is a time line for the Senate to follow when the Constitution does not, in fact, dictate or prescribe a timeline for Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

When are you going to cite the constitution, where you insist the American public votes on a SCOTUS nomination, chimpmister?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

When are you going to cite the constitution, where you insist the American public votes on a SCOTUS nomination, chimpmister?

That would be your straw man argument illustrating how fuckin' stupid you are, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, because the Constitution details how it's the Senate that is responsible for confirming a judicial nominee; furthermore, nowhere in the Constitution does it dictate or prescribe a timeline for Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee as you are arguing, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

That would be your straw man argument illustrating how fuckin' stupid you are, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, because the Constitution details how it's the Senate that is responsible for confirming a judicial nominee; furthermore, nowhere in the Constitution does it dictate or prescribe a timeline for Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee as you are arguing, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

No fuckhead it is yours. Your straw man argument was, I stated there was a timeline. Just another of your many lies. You are backing the turtle, who wants the voters to have a pick.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

No fuckhead it is yours. Your straw man argument was, I stated there was a timeline. Just another of your many lies. You are backing the turtle, who wants the voters to have a pick.

You'd be the braying barnyard jackass braying about the necessity of this Senate considering this president's nominee before the end of the year, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, and Constitution does not dictate or prescribe a timeline for the Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee as you are so stupidly arguing, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

[cptjohnstone]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You'd be the braying barnyard jackass braying about the necessity of this Senate considering this president's nominee before the end of the year, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, and Constitution does not dictate or prescribe a timeline for the Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee as you are so stupidly arguing, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

he is a waste of bandwidth

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by cptjohnstone

he is a waste of bandwidth

Yes chicken dick is!!! You finally got something right.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Yes chicken dick is!!! You finally got something right.

You're a delusional barnyard faggot that cannot back up your asinine assertion that the Senate is somehow Constitutionally required to act according to some fictional timeline when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're a delusional barnyard faggot that cannot back up your asinine assertion that the Senate is somehow Constitutionally required to act according to some fictional timeline when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

That dumb-ass picture you repeatedly post of yourself standing in the corner like a dim-retard is quite appropriate, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. You obviously lack the intelligence to pick the side of an argument you can support with substantive evidence, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. You remain a delusional barnyard faggot that cannot back up your asinine argument that the Senate is somehow Constitutionally required to act according to some fictional timeline when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

That dumb-ass picture you repeatedly post of yourself standing in the corner like a dim-retard is quite appropriate, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. You obviously lack the intelligence to pick the side of an argument you can support with substantive evidence, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. You remain a delusional barnyard faggot that cannot back up your asinine argument that the Senate is somehow Constitutionally required to act according to some fictional timeline when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

Can you suck dicks as well as you lie? Woommby wants to know. He has a new business for you two.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Can you suck dicks as well as you lie? Woommby wants to know. He has a new business for you two.

You'd be the one sucking, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, since you obviously lack the intelligence to pick the side of an argument you can support with substantive evidence, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. You remain a delusional barnyard faggot that cannot back up your asinine argument that the Senate is somehow Constitutionally required to act according to some fictional timeline when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You'd be the one sucking, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, since you obviously lack the intelligence to pick the side of an argument you can support with substantive evidence, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. You remain a delusional barnyard faggot that cannot back up your asinine argument that the Senate is somehow Constitutionally required to act according to some fictional timeline when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

Ekim sure has gone off the deep end since HIS hero and mentor woomby left him !!! Poor ole EKIM !!! STILL hurting over ANOTHER rejection ! And election day just reminds him of all the work he put into woomby's landslide DOTY election ( in the hopes that woomby would make HIM his " Vice-DOTY " ) only to be thrown to the ground like a used Depends !!! Wonder how many of EKIM'S barn doors have "gotten the treatment " for his new " mobile " bidness ?

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

Ekim sure has gone off the deep end since HIS hero and mentor woomby left him !!! Poor ole EKIM !!! STILL hurting over ANOTHER rejection ! And election day just reminds him of all the work he put into woomby's landslide DOTY election ( in the hopes that woomby would make HIM his " Vice-DOTY " ) only to be thrown to the ground like a used Depends !!! Wonder how many of EKIM'S barn doors have "gotten the treatment " for his new " mobile " bidness ?

Grab those doors woomby your cocksucking pardner chicken dick is wanting to set up a new location, you guys have sucked them dry here.

[CuteOldGuy]

But, LittleEva, you always side with the Left. Not sure you are truly an "independent".