Was the Optimator right after all?

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by hobbylover

I already said this in the OP...please follow along...even listed an example, although she's over 25 so maybe Whispers won't agree she's successful, lol

My response was directed to emptywallet whom I quoted.

Where was you comment then?

[hobbylover]

Originally Posted by emptywallet

A good assistant/manager can stay hidden. Ladies, keep this in mind when picking an assistant or manager.

I disagree, a good manager or assistant (these are different things as I stated above) cannot stay hidden. If they do they aren't "good". There should be no behind the scenes bullshit, it degrades the "sanctity" of having verified provider status.

As Whispers and I noted, it would really suck to find out your PM's and texts of sweet nothings or other BS fucktards do prior to an appt were really with a 3rd party. There will always be incongruities in the conversations like the one above that if a fucktard pays attention he will notice. That's why I speculated that OLM was pissed. Maybe he found out he was romancing some dude instead of the little sweety he was planning to see. Maybe the manager was like Pyramider and asked to see OLMs taint...

[whatacrock]

Originally Posted by hobbylover

I disagree, a good manager or assistant (these are different things as I stated above) cannot stay hidden. If they do they aren't "good". There should be no behind the scenes bullshit, it degrades the "sanctity" of having verified provider status.

As Whispers and I noted, it would really suck to find out your PM's and texts of sweet nothings or other BS fucktards do prior to an appt were really with a 3rd party. There will always be incongruities in the conversations like the one above that if a fucktard pays attention he will notice. That's why I speculated that OLM was pissed. Maybe he found out he was romancing some dude instead of the little sweety he was planning to see. Maybe the manager was like Pyramider and asked to see the taint...

Lol...taint

[Guest110516]

Originally Posted by hobbylover

I disagree, a good manager or assistant (these are different things as I stated above) cannot stay hidden. If they do they aren't "good". There should be no behind the scenes bullshit, it degrades the "sanctity" of having verified provider status.

As Whispers and I noted, it would really suck to find out your PM's and texts of sweet nothings or other BS fucktards do prior to an appt were really with a 3rd party. There will always be incongruities in the conversations like the one above that if a fucktard pays attention he will notice. That's why I speculated that OLM was pissed. Maybe he found out he was romancing some dude instead of the little sweety he was planning to see. Maybe the manager was like Pyramider and asked to see the taint...

I agree managers and assistants are different. I used "/" instead of "or."

For me, the main thing is I don't want to meet (or otherwise sense the presence of) the manager/assistant when I am with the provider. I might make an exception for female managers/assistants. Just like the Os. Fake it well, and I'm happy.

"Sanctity of the verified provider" -- hmm. This is about the "indy" label, right? I understand your point about having different labels.

Well, we don't have to agree about everything. No need to don our inflatable chicken suits and make an appointment at the OLM Fight Club...yet.

[whatacrock]

Rule # 2 of Luigi's fight ♣ club! Only extend fight chalenges to mongers 3 hours away, then accuse them of being chicken shits when they don't show up.

"With in arms reach of course"

[texxxassfilms]

Don't be sending sweet nothings to a whore....unless you're paying her, she probably doesn't care about your bullshit and chances are high that someone else is also on the other line.

I don't know anyone that's sweet talked a whore with a high rate of return.

I don't even use my real name with any Provider, use a hobby number, and maybe I'm just not stupid enough to put my real info out there.

[ck1942]

"sanctity" of having verified provider status

Adding the above to my next edition of Hobbying for Dummies!

Code of Conduct and Ethics for Johns and Janes is almost at the printers.

= = = = =

Never, ever, assume or presume that any convo (vocal, text, pm, em, etc.) twixt provider and hobbyist can ever be totally private.

Always assume that anything you say or do anywhere can come back and bite yer ass.

[hobbylover]

Originally Posted by texxxassfilms

Don't be sending sweet nothings to a whore....unless you're paying her, she probably doesn't care about your bullshit and chances are high that someone else is also on the other line.

TAF, interesting comment. You should know better than most what fucktards send. Hasn't that been what Louigi's been bitching about from the start?

Originally Posted by texxxassfilms

I don't know anyone that's sweet talked a whore with a high rate of return.

From my own chats with providers, unfortunately a lot of fucktards send texts to providers leading up to an appt. Part of the game I guess. I'm pretty sure they wouldn't do that to agencies.

Once again, you would know better than most. Louigi's taint pic didn't do it for you, er, I mean her?

Originally Posted by texxxassfilms

I don't even use my real name with any Provider, use a hobby number, and maybe I'm just not stupid enough to put my real info out there.

But stupid enough to review a provider that was part of your own agency as a legitimate unbiased review?

Cheers!

[hobbylover]

Originally Posted by ck1942

"sanctity" of having verified provider status

Adding the above to my next edition of Hobbying for Dummies!

Code of Conduct and Ethics for Johns and Janes is almost at the printers.

= = = = =

Never, ever, assume or presume that any convo (vocal, text, pm, em, etc.) twixt provider and hobbyist can ever be totally private.

Always assume that anything you say or do anywhere can come back and bite yer ass.

CK, the "sanctity" of Verified Providers was referring that these providers are legitimate providers. Nothing past that. I made the leap that "verified provider" also meant "Indy" but at least here in S. Texas that isn't the case. Since we both use Verified Providers to vouch for guys, I would be concerned with PMs from VP's that are being managed.

As for anything said between ANYONE, providers OR hobbyists will EVER be kept private except for those most rare of occasions, I totally agree with you!

Cheers!

[hobbylover]

Originally Posted by emptywallet

I agree managers and assistants are different. I used "/" instead of "or."

For me, the main thing is I don't want to meet (or otherwise sense the presence of) the manager/assistant when I am with the provider. I might make an exception for female managers/assistants. Just like the Os. Fake it well, and I'm happy.

"Sanctity of the verified provider" -- hmm. This is about the "indy" label, right? I understand your point about having different labels.

Well, we don't have to agree about everything. No need to don our inflatable chicken suits and make an appointment at the OLM Fight Club...yet.

EW, I always appreciate discussions with you. I believe it's called discourse. Even when we disagree we can do so without resorting to name calling or starting a fight club at a local watering hole.

Cheers!

[texxxassfilms]

Hobbylover, it wasn't stupidity that led me to write a review of someone in the agency. I simply did not know, and even asked if that was kosher prior to even posting reviews. I was told by a Mod that it didn't appear to violate any rules, but that I wouldn't be granted PA credit. With that understanding, I posted.... I don't do stupid things. I calculate.

[hobbylover]

Originally Posted by texxxassfilms

Hobbylover, it wasn't stupidity that led me to write a review of someone in the agency. I simply did not know, and even asked if that was kosher prior to even posting reviews. I was told by a Mod that it didn't appear to violate any rules, but that I wouldn't be granted PA credit. With that understanding, I posted.... I don't do stupid things. I calculate.

TAF, interesting point of view. Of course there are two sides to every story (or three: yours, theirs, and the truth).

Although I'm not sure that people would agree that starting an agency without knowing the guidelines wouldn't be classified as stupid. As for calculating, it appears you calculated incorrectly. Making a review of your own group is akin to the tobacco industry sponsoring studies showing that cigarettes are healthy...IJS...

[Guest110516]

Originally Posted by hobbylover

EW, I always appreciate discussions with you. I believe it's called discourse. Even when we disagree we can do so without resorting to name calling or starting a fight club at a local watering hole.

Cheers!

Who are you calling a discourse!?!

It is ON, HL.

IT IS ON!!!

[dearhunter]

Originally Posted by texxxassfilms

Hobbylover, it wasn't stupidity that led me to write a review of someone in the agency. I simply did not know, and even asked if that was kosher prior to even posting reviews. I was told by a Mod that it didn't appear to violate any rules, but that I wouldn't be granted PA credit. With that understanding, I posted.... I don't do stupid things. I calculate.

Setting aside the second handle issue, who was the modtard that told you it is ok to review ladies in your own agency?

[Stanfeld]

Don't be sending sweet nothings to a whore....unless you're paying her, she probably doesn't care

You mean those reams of Iambic pentameter text to her were for naught?