Age Discrimination? Curiosity....

[tabitharain]

I am interested in knowing what you fella's think...
If a girl has a preferred age and declines to see say someone under 40, as I do for instance, what do you think that means?

It was recently brought to my attention that I was referred to as the W word whatever that means because I have an age preference... Well, heres a little back story, and tell me if I am wrong!

I seen a gentlemen, who happened to be a newbie, and he was 35, had major problems with him, such as him literally putting a whole in my wall, thus leading me to decline to see anyone under the age of 40. I feel that I have a right to choose who I would like to entertain, when and where.... But I guess some fella's think otherwise.... So I am curious as to what you think!

Like you men, most have a specific type, a certain preference, so why can't we? Or do you think that because we are on the receiving end of a gift we are obligated to see whomever? I mean no disrespect, but as most of you fella's know, maturity for men comes at a much slower rate, and then to top it off, I did not mention all the young bucks who offer to sweep me off my feet, and send weird pm's when they see a new review pop up, and are peeved because I am seeing other people.... So do I have a legit reason or not?

What do you think? Share your thoughts, and I will analyze the situation, and maybe change my mind, that is if the gentlemen is of a deserving nature, and doesn't send up any red-flags!

__________________
TOB ID# 108490
Date-Check ID# tr0344f
P411 ID# 144555
mstabitharain@yahoo.com
http://www.mstabitharain.escortbook.com
__________________

Live life to the fullest, and indulge is pleasure!

[watchoutthegameisrigged]

Just like the men here, you have the right to see who you want to see and the right to not see who you don't want to see. This is the most personal of businesses and everybody is not for everybody. Unlike the men, those decisions will affect your income. The trade offs there are your decision and only you can weigh them. It's nobody's business but yours.

[Old-T]

You have the right to see/not see whomever you choose. I have--rarely--been turned away because of my age, racial/ethnic group, and age. The only time it has bothered me is when the lady did so AFTER I had traveled a significant way to see her.

Personally, I think your age limit is not selective enough and you should consider raising it.

[Becca Blossoms]

I admit, I age discriminate. I'm 41 years old, I have a 20 year old child. It's very uncomfortable for me to see someone my child's age. I would feel like I'm with a child. As a result, I require 30 years or older. I prefer to see older gentlemen, we have more in common. What am I going to talk about with a 25 year old? The maturity level simply isn't there and I'm a mature woman

If I don't enjoy myself in the hobby, it simply isn't worth any amount of money.

[chicagoboy]

Originally Posted by tabitharain

It was recently brought to my attention that I was referred to as the W word whatever that means because I have an age preference...

What the flock is "the W word"?

[offshoredrilling]

Originally Posted by Becca Blossoms

I admit, I age discriminate. I'm 41 years old, I have a 20 year old child. It's very uncomfortable for me to see someone my child's age. I would feel like I'm with a child. As a result, I require 30 years or older. I prefer to see older gentlemen, we have more in common. What am I going to talk about with a 25 year old? The maturity level simply isn't there and I'm a mature woman

If I don't enjoy myself in the hobby, it simply isn't worth any amount of money.

Why I tend not to see a lady under 30
rather 40 something, 50 something also works for me

[gimme_that]

I'm well under 40 right now. But I started hobbying off an on in between relationships when I was 22. Was definitely harder to see ladies when I was younger.


When I see an age restriction of any type on a ladies page, I assume a few things just based on my experiences........

1. Shes slightly over the age she advertises. "Especially is she advertises to be in her 35 to 45 age range herself but doesn't quite look it."

2. She considers seeing a client under 40 "more work" for the same pay stamina wise. Young guys will want to experiment and try more while older guys are usually stuck in the zone of what they usually do with a routine.

3. She advertising strickly to an age range that will limit her from being exposed to men from her own age range and peer group so she has less chance of getting possibly outed or recognized.

4. On backpage....or ladies with no rep for good or bad service........having an age restriction makes the rob or cash and dash easier since the older clients are less agile and try to avoid confrontation. The older client will take his rip off as a learning experience and just a hazard of the business. Try to avoid confrontation and leave to avoid drawing attention.

Where as a younger client who is geting ripped off may be a bigger problem and unpredictable. He probably has no wife kids or an issue in real life that will cause him to be embarrassed he's getting ripped off. He could get "ignant" if pushed.......lol

For the most part seeing a lady with an age restriction won't prevent me from calling if I'm under it. For the most part they can tell by my phone demeanor that I'm mature. But what I do notice more times than not ladies 40 and older seem to ask me the most uncomfortable questions to secure a date. And based on how much dialogue is exchanged I assess whether seeing her is to my benefit.

Every now and then though......there that diamond in the rough of a lady in her late thirties early fourties who has sexual stamina that even I cant match. Mens sexual peek comes when they are far younger than when womens sexual peek is. So I wish just based on performance ladies who were older would consider this lol. MILF porn anyone........




I will say for the most part I trry to see ladies my age or younger or slightly above it if they don't look their age. But for the most parts on dinner dates I will only take out. Ladies very close to my age, just makes the conversation flow better.

[RALPHEY BOY]

see who you want to and the cry babies that piss and moan about it tell them to pound sand!!.

you cannot be everything to everyone!! I stared doing this at 25 mostly Studios/Spas in Houston then by the time I graduated to Incall/Out call Providers I was 33. I have never had any issues seeing who I wanted to see

[ICU 812]

You can, and should set whatever boundries you wish. safety and confedience are paramount for both Hobbyists and Providers.

As a man, I might think that 40 is a bit too high, but hay, the rules are yours to set. That is why you are referred to as an independent.

[Guest110516]

Originally Posted by tabitharain

If a girl has a preferred age and declines to see say someone under 40, as I do for instance, what do you think that means?

To me, it means you have an age preference. If I really want/need to know why, I'll ask. Otherwise, you have your preferences, and I have mine.

[tabitharain]

Originally Posted by ICU 812

You can, and should set whatever boundries you wish. safety and confedience are paramount for both Hobbyists and Providers.

As a man, I might think that 40 is a bit too high, but hay, the rules are yours to set. That is why you are referred to as an independent.

That is what I thought Independent meant too!
I am 26, and have stamina that has had men "TAP OUT" before, but I find that your typical younger man is a little to aggressive and pushy... & true have less to lose, but that to me doesn't matter, because I am a A+ provider, which is why they I have experienced younger men becoming attached, and in this kind of atmosphere, I don't want any ATTACHMENTS just enjoyable encounters!

[Hermosa]

The only time I get my feelings hurt is when the age limit excludes me! While most of the discussions seem to be directed at "youngsters", I'm really feeling kind of horney now!
Nice!

[Old-T]

I doubt you intended it that way, but your post is actually an example of why some ladies have age minimums. Go back and read your post dispassionately--you have worded it quite insulting to a lot of ladies.

Originally Posted by gimme_that

I'm well under 40 right now. But I started hobbying off an on in between relationships when I was 22. Was definitely harder to see ladies when I was younger.


When I see an age restriction of any type on a ladies page, I assume a few things just based on my experiences........

1. Shes slightly over the age she advertises. "Especially is she advertises to be in her 35 to 45 age range herself but doesn't quite look it."

2. She considers seeing a client under 40 "more work" for the same pay stamina wise. Young guys will want to experiment and try more while older guys are usually stuck in the zone of what they usually do with a routine.

3. She advertising strickly to an age range that will limit her from being exposed to men from her own age range and peer group so she has less chance of getting possibly outed or recognized.

4. On backpage....or ladies with no rep for good or bad service........having an age restriction makes the rob or cash and dash easier since the older clients are less agile and try to avoid confrontation. The older client will take his rip off as a learning experience and just a hazard of the business. Try to avoid confrontation and leave to avoid drawing attention.

Where as a younger client who is geting ripped off may be a bigger problem and unpredictable. He probably has no wife kids or an issue in real life that will cause him to be embarrassed he's getting ripped off. He could get "ignant" if pushed.......lol

For the most part seeing a lady with an age restriction won't prevent me from calling if I'm under it. For the most part they can tell by my phone demeanor that I'm mature. But what I do notice more times than not ladies 40 and older seem to ask me the most uncomfortable questions to secure a date. And based on how much dialogue is exchanged I assess whether seeing her is to my benefit.

Every now and then though......there that diamond in the rough of a lady in her late thirties early fourties who has sexual stamina that even I cant match. Mens sexual peek comes when they are far younger than when womens sexual peek is. So I wish just based on performance ladies who were older would consider this lol. MILF porn anyone........




I will say for the most part I trry to see ladies my age or younger or slightly above it if they don't look their age. But for the most parts on dinner dates I will only take out. Ladies very close to my age, just makes the conversation flow better.

[Dynalow96]

Originally Posted by tabitharain

I am interested in knowing what you fella's think...
If a girl has a preferred age and declines to see say someone under 40, as I do for instance, what do you think that means?

It was recently brought to my attention that I was referred to as the W word whatever that means because I have an age preference... Well, heres a little back story, and tell me if I am wrong!

I seen a gentlemen, who happened to be a newbie, and he was 35, had major problems with him, such as him literally putting a whole in my wall, thus leading me to decline to see anyone under the age of 40. I feel that I have a right to choose who I would like to entertain, when and where.... But I guess some fella's think otherwise.... So I am curious as to what you think!

Like you men, most have a specific type, a certain preference, so why can't we? Or do you think that because we are on the receiving end of a gift we are obligated to see whomever? I mean no disrespect, but as most of you fella's know, maturity for men comes at a much slower rate, and then to top it off, I did not mention all the young bucks who offer to sweep me off my feet, and send weird pm's when they see a new review pop up, and are peeved because I am seeing other people.... So do I have a legit reason or not?

What do you think? Share your thoughts, and I will analyze the situation, and maybe change my mind, that is if the gentlemen is of a deserving nature, and doesn't send up any red-flags!

__________________
TOB ID# 108490
Date-Check ID# tr0344f
P411 ID# 144555
mstabitharain@yahoo.com
http://www.mstabitharain.escortbook.com
__________________

Live life to the fullest, and indulge is pleasure!

What the providers do takes a lot of courage and bravery as they never know what the person that comes to the door will really be like. I respect their bravery and courage and realize just how hard it would be for me even as a male to do the same thing. With that said set your limits where you feel safe and comfortable and be safe in all you do.

I for one read all I can on a provider I would like to see and share my age and limitations with her previous to the visit so there are no surprises and it has served me well in that I have had mostly rewarding and fun visits and would be happy to be on a friends basis with many providers as once the ice is broken and you develop a comfort level on both parties parts the session becomes fun and gets better upon repeat.

I just read the rules and discuss anything I think might be boarder line and proceed per the providers wishes. Makes for a fun and enjoyable session and after all isn't that what we're all searching for? Fun, pleasure, erotic encounters that are pleasing as possible given the situation for all involved. Hobby safe everyone!

[Asfaloth54]

To the OP - first of all, absolutely you can set any restrictions you wish. It's your body and safety at issue. Plus, it appears to me that a black man simply can't get laid, as virtually every BP ad I've ever seen makes the point of excluding them. So if discrimination based on race - a protected class - is accepted in this hobby, then obviously discriminating based on age should not raise any eyebrows.

However, I am struck by the seeming absence of logic you have disclosed. WTF does one 35 year old guy being a mental case with anger issues have to do with every other guy under 40? That seems an irrational reason to discriminate against half the men on the planet. lol.

Don't get me wrong. I'm 61 and would be happy for all providers to exclude all those wild and crazy kids under 55. More action for me. Your decision just doesn't appear to have a rational basis.