Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

GlobeSpotter · 10-09-2015, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dearhunter

.....
The potty mouth whore is a liar on top of an outer..............

The only reason your ass is back.........it is called "mercy".......and it did not come from St.C.

OMFG, ....This just keeps getting better.

Or is it worse....

boardman · 10-09-2015, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

OMFG, ....This just keeps getting better.

Or is it worse....

I thought you'd like that one.

Pistolero · 10-09-2015, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boardman

necessary to tell her to come in and drop it. LMMFAO

Quote:

Originally Posted by boardman

wonder why he's not telling you to drop it.

hmm. I missed it . Which post was that where I told her to drop it? Don't remember that.

Not a reason to tell anyone to drop it, even you.

I asked her to take St C's advice and drop it.

GlobeSpotter · 10-09-2015, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pistolero

hmm. I missed it . Which post was that where I told her to drop it? Don't remember that.
.......

Your memory sucks.

Maybe it was this one:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pistolero

.......

Please, just drop it.

boardman · 10-09-2015, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pistolero

Fancy, the staff has been staying very silent on this. However, your comments are beginning to paint us in a bad light. If you have indeed talked to St C and he advised you to walk away from the subject, then you should take his advise.

You know the facts on several of your statements in this post. And there are facts you are not privy to.

Please, just drop it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pistolero

hmm. I missed it . Which post was that where I told her to drop it? Don't remember that.

Not a reason to tell anyone to drop it, even you.

I asked her to take St C's advice and drop it.

It was in two separate statements that you mentioned St. C and suggesting she drop it. You even used spacing to separate the thoughts. It came across to me as you telling her to drop it.

You didn't ask her. You'd had to have used a ?

Any other parts of that post you'd like to take issue with like how quiet staff has been or continues to be? <<<<<See what I did there? <<<<<<oops, did it again.

GlobeSpotter · 10-09-2015, 02:35 PM

Post #501

boardman · 10-09-2015, 02:54 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dearhunter

.....
The potty mouth whore is a liar on top of an outer..............

The only reason your ass is back.........it is called "mercy".......and it did not come from St.C.

Begs the question...If it wasn't St. C that showed mercy for outing , who was it?

That statement was made with some authority so apparently St. C wasn't on board with it. Which leads back to.......

dearhunter · 10-09-2015, 03:17 PM

You don't have a clue what St.C was on board with. If you want to know so bad, go ask him.

You quoted the modtard who told you who gave the whining whore mercy........all the whining whores and pussies in this threAD begging for their Fancy back.

Maybe you bitches can beg the local modtards to reconsider that ban and take it back to 1 yr.........that will teach them a lesson.

You have convinced me.........reinstate the 1 yr ban

Then, Fancy could come back as Tebow incarnate a year from now..........that would be fucking awesome.

Until that happens, she gets to be a potty mouth whore who outs fucktards RLI and then doubles down on advocating doing so.

It is what it is..........this is an awesome threAD.........Lexi, you could almost become my new favorite.

WTF · 10-09-2015, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

Accusing a provider publicly of OUTING, the most heinous of crimes in our world, requires knowing ALL of the facts, which few of you do and I've already told you I cannot discuss further. I have been warned to walk away from this issue, and that is what I must do. If I had actually outed someone, yes, I WOULD still be banned for a year, wouldn't I?

No you would not still be banned a year if i read your first post correctly...your ban was reduced from a year to a month because all the ladies in infoshare were under the impression that they could banter about RW info in the name of safety.

Next you said you were only going to discuss this once and that St Chris agreed with you in that that was a good idea...you have now talked at least twice more about it. So in my mind you have lied to St Chris and all members about not posting again. Either do what you originally said you were going to do and stfu about this or post your side....enough with this i was banned for a year but it was reduced to a month but i did not do a damn thing wring. That dog don't hunt.

offshoredrilling · 10-09-2015, 03:41 PM

threAD?

WTF · 10-09-2015, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

Not my intention. Dropped. Wish everyone else would do the same. Would be the best birthday present I could wish for, indeed.

Yet you have revived this issue not once but at least twice now.

It seems as if you want to say that you were banned for thirty days but did nothing wrong. That makes no sense....yet when questioned , you double down on repeating that head scratcher and insult the folks who say that your claim makes no sense.

GlobeSpotter · 10-09-2015, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dearhunter

NO JUSTICE.....NO PIECE

Amen to Tebow

dearhunter · 10-09-2015, 04:06 PM

I am beginning to see where boardman is going with this.........

Looking at her explanation, it appears that she spun them a tale about how she didn't mean to be a potty mouth and if they would give her leniency, she would be a good whore and never do it again.

Then, she (knowing that the modtards cannot disclose the actual conversation) comes in here and tells a new tale of woe and how she schooled them modtards and they were forced to make the ban go away (the month was a cooldown period for the modtards.......I served one of those). Then, she doubles down and sings a song of how whores never out anyone here.

I agree with boardman. Fancy played the Houston Modtards for suckers and should be returned to the wheel.......re-instate the 1 yr ban.

GlobeSpotter · 10-09-2015, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dearhunter

I am beginning to see where boardman is going with this.........

Looking at her explanation, it appears that she spun them a tale about how she didn't mean to be a potty mouth and if they would give her leniency, she would be a good whore and never do it again.

Then, she (knowing that the modtards cannot disclose the actual conversation) comes in here and tells a new tale of woe and how she schooled them modtards and they were forced to make the ban go away (the month was a cooldown period for the modtards.......I served one of those). Then, she doubles down and sings a song of how whores never out anyone here.

I agree with boardman. Fancy played the Houston Modtards for suckers and should be returned to the wheel.......re-instate the 1 yr ban.

does this /\ /\ /\ /\ answer: \/ \/ \/ \/

Quote:

Originally Posted by chicagoboy

.....explain what she did to merit a one-year ban, which is normally reserved only for extremely cunty behavior, isn't it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

That is likely correct.

But I'm more interested what extreme behavior or favors got her an 11 month reduction.

Did 30 days of mod pussy and cock suckin get her an early release?

Has she paid in full at the end of 1 month? ..... or did she finance it and guzzle a few loads each month for 11 months?

oilfieldscum · 10-09-2015, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

As with the size of some fellows' prowess, things have been greatly exaggerated.

I concurr many a fucktard exaggerates about the size and function of his tool.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

I have NEVER posted enough info on ANY member of this board in Infoshare to lead to someone's real-life identification, nor, frankly have I ever personally seen that done by any other provider.

How much "info" is required to lead to someone's real life identification?

Me thincks even posting a fucktards real first name is considered outing. That's not to mention where a fucktard works, the company's phone number, a fucktards license plate number, or other like "info" some providers seem to keep up with.

Am I to believe that none of that "info" on any fucktards on eccie has been bantered around infoshare? That seems pretty hard to swallow...ijs

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

but there is also a fine line that all ladies must tread regarding their security and the safety of others. I take as little information as I can get away with during screening.

You would seem to be suggesting that providers must seek a fucktards personal info to screen. Am I to believe that none of that info has ever been posted in infoshare? Any posting of that would be considered outing...correct?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

If I had actually outed someone, yes, I WOULD still be banned for a year, wouldn't I? And deservedly so.

I don't know....would you? Only you and the modtards know the answer to that one.