Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 400
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70831
biomed163764
Yssup Rider61304
gman4453377
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48840
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37431
CryptKicker37231
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-28-2015, 07:30 AM   #166
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default 100 Generals and Admirals say "Reject The "Treaty.""

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...64b_story.html

Excerpts:
A group of nearly 200 retired generals and admirals sent a letter to Congress on Wednesday urging lawmakers to reject the Iran nuclear agreement, which they say threatens national security.
....
Many of the signatories served in the White House, under Democratic administrations as well as Republican. The only thing they appear to have in common is that they consider the Iran nuclear deal a threat to U.S. interests in the region and its own national security.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 08-28-2015, 11:57 AM   #167
WombRaider
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly View Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...64b_story.html

Excerpts:
A group of nearly 200 retired generals and admirals sent a letter to Congress on Wednesday urging lawmakers to reject the Iran nuclear agreement, which they say threatens national security.
....
Many of the signatories served in the White House, under Democratic administrations as well as Republican. The only thing they appear to have in common is that they consider the Iran nuclear deal a threat to U.S. interests in the region and its own national security.
What ISN'T a threat to our interests in the region? These are military men. All they know is war. They are in favor of the path that leads to war. The deal is going to pass. It's over. Repubs don't have the numbers. They need 67 and they're having trouble getting 60.
WombRaider is offline   Quote
Old 08-29-2015, 05:11 AM   #168
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly View Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...64b_story.html

Excerpts:
A group of nearly 200 retired generals and admirals sent a letter to Congress on Wednesday urging lawmakers to reject the Iran nuclear agreement, which they say threatens national security.
....
Many of the signatories served in the White House, under Democratic administrations as well as Republican. The only thing they appear to have in common is that they consider the Iran nuclear deal a threat to U.S. interests in the region and its own national security.
What the scientists have said in the letter to President Obama trumps anything the retired generals have said.

The letter from the retired military officers followed the release this past weekend of a letter to Obama by 29 of the nation’s leading scientists, who called the Iran deal “technically sound, stringent and innovative” and said it would “provide the necessary assurance in the coming decade and more that Iran is not developing nuclear weapons.”
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 08-29-2015, 06:42 AM   #169
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

We have had assurances from the Iranians before and they've been meaningless. Its not our scientist's opinion we should be concerned about but the former Soviet Union scientists who are helping them.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 08-29-2015, 07:11 AM   #170
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly View Post
We have had assurances from the Iranians before and they've been meaningless. Its not our scientist's opinion we should be concerned about but the former Soviet Union scientists who are helping them.
This deal was inevitable due to the influence Iran gained due to the invasion of Iraq.

Anybody who has read the tea leafs knew Iraq's PM cut a deal with Iran to run us out of Iraq with that agreement Bush signed.

We now need to actually work with Iran to try and stabilize the region. Of course those that profit from war are not happy about any stability in the region...especially Israel, they see it as the USA not having to depend on them.

Ronald Reagan would have approved this deal!
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 08-29-2015, 09:52 AM   #171
DSK
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 8,050
Encounters: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
This deal was inevitable due to the influence Iran gained due to the invasion of Iraq.

Anybody who has read the tea leafs knew Iraq's PM cut a deal with Iran to run us out of Iraq with that agreement Bush signed.

We now need to actually work with Iran to try and stabilize the region. Of course those that profit from war are not happy about any stability in the region...especially Israel, they see it as the USA not having to depend on them.

Ronald Reagan would have approved this deal!
Yes he would have - we aren't going to get anything better - unless Trump is in charge!!!
DSK is offline   Quote
Old 08-29-2015, 10:42 AM   #172
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DSK View Post
Yes he would have - we aren't going to get anything better - unless Trump is in charge!!!
Viva la Trump!
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 01:55 AM   #173
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly View Post
We have had assurances from the Iranians before and they've been meaningless.
Everyone knows the Iranians have tried to cheat in the past. The mechanisms used to detect cheating are BETTER NOW. The declared nuclear sites will be monitored 24/7 from day one. Any new site that is detected can be monitored as well. The scientists with the "G" security clearance know more about nuclear physics and bombs than anyone on EARTH. If they feel good about the deal, that is good enough for me.

It appears that it is good enough for 27 democratic senators. If 7 more join them, that will be enough to block a veto override attempt by the republicans.
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 03:11 AM   #174
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
Everyone knows the Iranians have tried to cheat in the past. The mechanisms used to detect cheating are BETTER NOW. The declared nuclear sites will be monitored 24/7 from day one. Any new site that is detected can be monitored as well. The scientists with the "G" security clearance know more about nuclear physics and bombs than anyone on EARTH. If they feel good about the deal, that is good enough for me.

It appears that it is good enough for 27 democratic senators. If 7 more join them, that will be enough to block a veto override attempt by the republicans.
You really have no idea what's in the deal, do you?
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 03:51 AM   #175
WombRaider
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
You really have no idea what's in the deal, do you?
You don't know what's in it and that's good enough reason for you to have an opinion on it. We've been told the security measures present in the deal to monitor the Iranians. You can google them anytime and look for yourself. Your inability to properly research is not our burden to remedy.
WombRaider is offline   Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 04:22 AM   #176
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
You really have no idea what's in the deal, do you?
A summary of the deal was provided in post #1. The letter from the scientists backs up everything that former SOD Brown said. I read the letter from the scientists, I have not read the deal. The highlights are:

The USA lifts its economic sanctions, Iran will get access to their money, about 150 billion dollars.

Iran will get rid of 90% of their Uranium ( isotope U-235) the radioactive one used in what scientists call nuclear fission. There is a way for the Uranium to be counted so that it can verified that Iran got rid of the Uranium.

This will push out by 15 years Iran's ability to make a NUCLEAR WEAPON.

Declared sites of nuclear activity are to be monitored 24/7 from day one. Any new suspicious site can be inspected after a request is put in, approx. 24+ days.

All of the other countries involved have agreed to the deal and they are going forward with or without the USA. They will lift their sanctions and begin trading with Iran.

There is no going back for another deal.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinio...ner/ar-BBlIZSi
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 08:46 AM   #177
DSK
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 8,050
Encounters: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Viva la Trump!
Well put!!
DSK is offline   Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 12:03 PM   #178
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
Everyone knows the Iranians have tried to cheat in the past. The mechanisms used to detect cheating are BETTER NOW. The declared nuclear sites will be monitored 24/7 from day one. Any new site that is detected can be monitored as well. The scientists with the "G" security clearance know more about nuclear physics and bombs than anyone on EARTH. If they feel good about the deal, that is good enough for me.

It appears that it is good enough for 27 democratic senators. If 7 more join them, that will be enough to block a veto override attempt by the republicans.
They didn't try, they did. How did we find out? One way was they turned off the monitoring cameras. I don't believe it gets any BETTER than that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
You really have no idea what's in the deal, do you?
Flighty wants the treaty passed to find out what's in it. But its meaningless anyway, the sanctions have been lifted thanks to Obama taking it to the UN and getting it approved. The "snap back" sanctions are a joke. Russia and Iran already are dealing for missile systems. Again, my guess is that one year from no major provisions of the treaty will be fulfilled on Iran's end.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 12:44 PM   #179
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly View Post

Flighty wants the treaty passed to find out what's in it. But its meaningless anyway, the sanctions have been lifted thanks to Obama taking it to the UN and getting it approved. The "snap back" sanctions are a joke. Russia and Iran already are dealing for missile systems. Again, my guess is that one year from no major provisions of the treaty will be fulfilled on Iran's end.
North Korea has nukes!
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 03:59 PM   #180
WombRaider
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
A summary of the deal was provided in post #1. The letter from the scientists backs up everything that former SOD Brown said. I read the letter from the scientists, I have not read the deal. The highlights are:

The USA lifts its economic sanctions, Iran will get access to their money, about 150 billion dollars.

Iran will get rid of 90% of their Uranium ( isotope U-235) the radioactive one used in what scientists call nuclear fission. There is a way for the Uranium to be counted so that it can verified that Iran got rid of the Uranium.

This will push out by 15 years Iran's ability to make a NUCLEAR WEAPON.

Declared sites of nuclear activity are to be monitored 24/7 from day one. Any new suspicious site can be inspected after a request is put in, approx. 24+ days.

All of the other countries involved have agreed to the deal and they are going forward with or without the USA. They will lift their sanctions and begin trading with Iran.

There is no going back for another deal.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinio...ner/ar-BBlIZSi
This is what idiots like LustyTard and COG don't get. We have constant satellite monitoring of these sites and other areas. They take pictures and compare them to see what changes, if any, have been made. They can see new construction, vehicles moving, any changes indicating an effort to build something new. Hell, they did this in WW2 with airplanes and we could tell where installations were, you think we can't do better now with satellites and computers? Jesus Christ.
WombRaider is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved