Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSarge
The sad thing is that the gents will write a review of a lady and bust her out in a hot second for poor TCB or BCD, etc. But if a lady complains about a specific gent, it is labeled as "board drama".
|
I totally agree that guys should uphold their side of the "review special" deals. However, I also believe that paid-for reviews are inherently unreliable. Imagine if Consumer Reports did something similar. Wouldn't that lower your trust of the reviews?
The quote above, however, is about a totally different matter. Is there an asymmetry in terms of "gents" reviewing "ladies" versus vice versa? *Of course* there is, and it's totally legitimate and obvious. The guys are paying the gals for a service. The relationship is asymmetric from the get go.
That doesn't mean guys are free to rip girls off or abuse them. Of course not. But we understand that reviews of restaurants get published, but restaurants do not publish reviews of their customers. Same thing here.
If providers expect the relationship to be entirely symmetric, a good start would be to not charge. Until then, and short of serious wrongdoing that is alert-worthy, expect to run a business and all that entails in terms of dealing with the public and keeping complaints about customers to yourself.