Quote:
Originally Posted by Gotyour6
5T3V3 got banned for asking to many questions
|
Probably!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old-T
I think it should be made known only if it is a threat to the community, such as a member who outed or physically threatened other members. Otherwise no.
|
threat makes it subjective - just posting rule #10 violation makes it factual.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SA Angel
I agree knowing someone's forum history and example of why they can't post well with others is a great screening tool. The problem with showing exactly why someone got banned is that is opens the door to more questions.
"Pointed out for medical speculation." Ohemgee now we need to know who they were talking about. "Banned for Outing" Some idiot will try to contact them just to get the information and the banned and butthurt poster will most likely share it.
They have to make the rules for the lowest common denominator on the site.
|
Some would be eaten by the curiosity bug - my reasons are simply if you out someone you are out to me. I am sure there are other things that would be the same for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeahMitchell
I think we should only know if someone was banned if they are threat to the community.
|
again threat = judgment call =subjective
Quote:
Originally Posted by inspector farquar
Who are you curious about?
|
nobody
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hottentot Venus
FTFY
|
I bet your breath smells like penis!