Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

WombRaider · 05-21-2015, 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I've been told that when people insult, the reveal themselves. We may only conclude that you are an "illiterate piece of shit" and a "hopeless turd". Interesting.

I've been told that when people try and insult someone else and can't even get that part right, they're a thundering twat.

CuteOldGuy · 05-21-2015, 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I've been told that when people try and insult someone else and can't even get that part right, they're a thundering twat.

Hmmm . . . You're a thundering twat, as well.

WombRaider · 05-21-2015, 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Hmmm . . . You're a thundering twat, as well.

I'm not WE, go fuck yourself. Play your schoolyard bullshit somewhere else.

Yssup Rider · 05-21-2015, 10:32 AM

Good thing you didn't call him a "cocksucker in the Salina Bus Station mensroom!"

Which, of course, he is! Just ask his "sweet ass IIFFYY!"

CuteOldGuy · 05-21-2015, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I'm not WE, go fuck yourself. Play your schoolyard bullshit somewhere else.

You're the one who said that a person is describing himself when he insults someone. I'm just putting it into perspective. I guess you like schoolyard bullshit. Your words, not mine.

WombRaider · 05-21-2015, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

You're the one who said that a person is describing himself when he insults someone. I'm just putting it into perspective. I guess you like schoolyard bullshit. Your words, not mine.

Here's what I said, you old, festering balloon knot:

I've found that in insults, people often describe their own condition.

And you, being the button-pushing turd you are, you've taken it to the extreme. You're MO is old. You put it on display with WE; you keep pushing until the joke just isn't funny anymore. You don't know when to quit. It was funny for a while, but then it stopped being funny. You kept going. Come up with some new shit, bitch tits.

I B Hankering · 05-21-2015, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shanm

[COLOR="Sienna"]I usually don't waste my time on a waste of time like you, but I just want to finish this one off.

I already quoted a link to the urban dictionary which corroborates what I said and proves that the word can be used the way I used it.

Now, I know your next post will mention that I'm quoting the urban dictionary (you are nothing if not predictable). Since you've made a habit of dredging up old posts, I'll pull one up of yours where you used the urban dictionary. It'll just take a second....here....hmmm....let me see...there it is:

Now that we've established that trying to be a smart ass is not your strong suit, the fact remains that you are an illiterate fucking retard!

Tell you what? If you can find in your "dictionary", regular or urban, that "an" may possibly be used before a word with a non-vowel sound, we'll let this one slide. What do you say?

Keep in mind, that until you do, you are still an illiterate fucking retard.[/B]

Notice how the entry for "Odumbo" admits that it is a "play", shamman, and then note that your misspelled version of "shoo-in" was identified by two cited sources as definitely being "misspelled", shamman.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Hoisted by his own retard, yet again. What an illiterate piece of shit he has revealed himself to be. All the grubergoobering in the world can't save this hopeless turd.

As mentioned before, your boyfriend introduced the topic, and you really need to reflect on your own errors, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I never called Dr King toxic, firstly. Our founding fathers were deists, at best. Thomas Jefferson wrote his own version of the bible. god is never mentioned in the constitution, except in ONE place; when they write the year of our lord in the date. That's it. No mention of him being for us or part of this country or any such bullshit.

As for the founding fathers, maybe you should read Article 11 of the treaty of tripoli:

Art. 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims]; and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan [Muslim] nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

BTW, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, matters of religion were relegated to the separate states by the 10th Amendment. President John Adams was a devout Unitarian who attended services regularly, and this is what Adams wrote for Massachusetts in 1779:

Quote:

A DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE INHABITANTS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

ARTICLE I. All men are born free and equal, and have certain natural, essential, and unalienable rights...

II. It is the right as well as the duty of all men in society, publicly, and at stated seasons, to worship the SUPREME BEING, the great Creator and Preserver of the universe. And no subject shall be hurt, molested, or restrained, in his person, liberty, or estate, for worshipping GOD in the manner and season most agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience; or for his religious profession of sentiments; provided he doth not disturb the public peace, or obstruct others in their religious worship.

Furthermore, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, Article 11 of the Treay of Tripoli is of questionable origin:

Quote:

As even a casual examination of the annotated translation of 1930 shows, the Barlow translation is at best a poor attempt at a paraphrase or summary of the sense of the Arabic; and even as such its defects throughout are obvious and glaring. Most extraordinary (and wholly unexplained) is the fact that Article 11 of the Barlow translation, with its famous phrase, "the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion," does not exist at all. There is no Article 11. The Arabic text which is between Articles 10 and 12 is in form a letter, crude and flamboyant and withal quite unimportant, from the Dey of Algiers to the Pasha of Tripoli. How that script came to be written and to be regarded, as in the Barlow translation, as Article 11 of the treaty as there written, is a mystery and seemingly must remain so. Nothing in the diplomatic correspondence of the time throws any light whatever on the point (Yale).

Also of note, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, the subsequent 1805 treaty with Tripoli, Treaty of Peace and Amity, definitely does not have that phrase; moreover, the 1805 treaty expressly addresses the difference between religions and mandates that no one be molested for their religious beliefs.

It's also noticeable how your ilk wants to play up Article 11 in the Barlow copy and willfully ignore the text in the Treaty of Paris, 1783, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas:

Quote:

In the Name of the most Holy & undivided Trinity.

It having pleased the Divine Providence ....

Done at Paris, this third day of September in the year of our Lord, one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three.

D HARTLEY (SEAL)
JOHN ADAMS (SEAL)
B FRANKLIN (SEAL)
JOHN JAY (SEAL)

(government documents).

JD Barleycorn · 05-21-2015, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Nope.

"White Americans are more punitive than people of color. . . .
"Whites misjudge how much crime is committed by African Americans and Latinos. . . .
"Whites who more strongly associate crime with racial minorities are more supportive of punitive policies. . . .
"Racial perceptions of crime have distorted the criminal justice system. . . ."

"By over-representing whites as victims of crimes perpetrated by people of color, crime news delivers a double blow to white audiences' potential for empathetic understanding of racial minorities."

How cute...he has quote marks around his sentences. We just know that he can cite these remarks if he really tries. Baby Killer is a very special, bed wetting twit with mommy issues.

JD Barleycorn · 05-21-2015, 03:49 PM

I want to bring everyone's attention to the words of Baby Killer. Instead of focusing on crime, he is trying to distract us by talking about race. Crime is crime, no matter who perpetrates it. Baby Killer cannot, will not understand that. As a devoted leftie progressive, he sees just about everything in some sort of racial lense. He has been totally brainwashed.
Now he will attack me the messenger instead of responding to the post.

WombRaider · 05-21-2015, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I want to bring everyone's attention to the words of Baby Killer. Instead of focusing on crime, he is trying to distract us by talking about race. Crime is crime, no matter who perpetrates it. Baby Killer cannot, will not understand that. As a devoted leftie progressive, he sees just about everything in some sort of racial lense. He has been totally brainwashed.
Now he will attack me the messenger instead of responding to the post.

The highlighted statement is incongruous with your previous feelings on the subject. A greatest hits, if you will, of your previous comments:

Wow! I was almost starting to believe that all thugs were black. Maybe not.

No one said racism does not exist. But according to your statement above, apparently it doesn't exist when talking about crime...

It was a black (I think race is important to understand the context here) Attorney General that said we were cowards for not wanting to talk about race.

You obviously think race is important in all these instances, but not when discussing crime. This is not an attack. I'm asking you to square these two opposing views you hold.

shanm · 05-21-2015, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shanm

Tell you what? If you can find in your "dictionary", regular or urban, that "an" may possibly be used before a word with a non-vowel sound, we'll let this one slide. What do you say?

Keep in mind, that until you do, you are still an illiterate fucking retard

Quote:

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

grubergrubergruber.

Can't find it, can you? ILLITERATE FUCKING RETARD

WombRaider · 05-21-2015, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shanm

Can't find it, can you? ILLITERATE FUCKING RETARD

I'm still wanting to know where grubergrubber is located in the dictionary.

Yssup Rider · 05-21-2015, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I want to bring everyone's attention to the words of Baby Killer. Instead of focusing on crime, he is trying to distract us by talking about race. Crime is crime, no matter who perpetrates it. Baby Killer cannot, will not understand that. As a devoted leftie progressive, he sees just about everything in some sort of racial lense. He has been totally brainwashed.
Now he will attack me the messenger instead of responding to the post.

Who the FUCK is Baby Killer?

Are you moralizing/judging on this here whooker board, JDHypocrite?

IIFFOFRDB · 05-21-2015, 09:31 PM

The O3stooges go fishing...

I B Hankering · 05-21-2015, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I'm still wanting to know where grubergrubber is located in the dictionary.

That would be one of your "under-construction" terms that deservedly hasn't earned a place in the American lexicon, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

BTW, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, Jefferson didn't write his own Bible, he cut out passages from the King James Bible that appealed to him and assembled them "for himself, for his devotion, for his assurance..."

Quote:

Originally Posted by shanm

ILLITERATE FUCKING RETARD

Yes you are, shamman.