Draw the prophet shootings in Texas

[shanm]

Originally Posted by RedLeg505

ROFL.. you go off the rails and call others cunt-nugget? Absolutely hilarious. Do you know what the PISS CHRIST art exhibit was dick breath?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5317545.html

Look it up. And then you quote "one of their speaker"?? WHO'S SPEAKER cum gobbler?

"The attention "Piss Christ" received continued well after the 1989 show. In 2011, protesters in France attacked and destroyed a print of the "blasphemous" work when it went on display in Avignon on Palm Sunday. And in 2012, the Catholic League got all hot and bothered about a retrospective of Serrano's career that featured the submerged Jesus photograph." quoting from PuffHo so you can't whine about it being a "right wing source"

So.. if those folks holding the Muhammad Cartoon are "to blame" for inciting the attack.. then.. was the artist/museum that displayed the offensive picture to blame for the attack and destruction of the offensive picture?

Tell us dipshit.. We'll all be fascinated to hear you back peddle on this.

God. you really are a cunt nugget.

So you're saying that an art exhibition from 1989 was actually what you were using to substantiate your argument? Excuse me for giving you the benefit of the doubt and thinking you actually had a "point" to your argument.

Here's what I thought your "visceral", "intuitive" point was. After all you've been babbling about it in every thread from here to the dark side of the moon.

Originally Posted by RedLeg505

Did you air the same objections when there was the "anti-free speech" meeting by Muslim groups held in the SAME ROOM of the SAME FACILITY in Garland Texas to promote stifling people from exercising free speech? http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/03/us/moh...test-shooting/

Ohh.. right, I forgot.. its okay if Muslims agitate and attack and shoot up someplace.. its only Americans that must be shut down and prevented from exercising Free Speech that might offend?

And somehow, I'm the one who's "going off the rails"......right.

The only crime I'm guilty of is thinking you're smarter than you actually are. Shoulda known. You're just another piss-bucket

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I didn't label it shit, jackass. And to say that it was favorably received by christians is to be a fucking liar. Of course that's not new territory for you, you dusty bukakke jizz beard... errr IB.

It was "popularly received" by your ilk who think such repugnant filth is "mysterious and beautiful", you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas; not those you demonstrably enjoy making fun of, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by RedLeg505

How are they NOT the same goddamn thing? In BOTH cases, you have "free speech" advocates claiming a right to do things that religious members find objectionable and both result in "violence".

But you only blame this anti-Muslim event, but not the anti-Christian event.

Why is that?

This is a perfect example of you arguing with yourself and putting shit in my mouth. I haven't said ONE goddamn word about the anti-christian piss thing. not ONE. And here you come, putting words in my goddamn mouth. I actually said that both parties in each instance knew that what they were doing could cause trouble.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

It was "popularly received" by your ilk who think such repugnant filth is "mysterious and beautiful", you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas; not those you demonstrably enjoy making fun of, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

Keep lying, chickenshit. I didn't popularly receive shit. Your problem is thinking that everyone is the same because they have a certain letter by their name.

[shanm]

Originally Posted by RedLeg505

And yet you and Woody and Shanny can't refute anything I post.. just spew name calling as per normal here.

Too Fucking Funny. Its why I come here.. to watch you all make jackasses of yourself. Like Shan confused the Piss Christ exhibit with the "Pro Islam" convention held in the same facility earlier... too stupid to know what you are saying.

But hey.. keep it up, its entertaining to watch you folks self-destruct like you do.

You know why I come here?

It's to watch dunces like you pretend to have opinions worth a damn. You'd need half a wit to become less than a half-wit.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Keep lying, chickenshit. I didn't popularly receive shit. Your problem is thinking that everyone is the same because they have a certain letter by their name.

Your profane advocacy against Christians makes it quite clear you would have no problems with Serrano's work, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

[RedLeg505]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

This is a perfect example of you arguing with yourself and putting shit in my mouth. I haven't said ONE goddamn word about the anti-christian piss thing. not ONE. And here you come, putting words in my goddamn mouth. I actually said that both parties in each instance knew that what they were doing could cause trouble.

Jesus FUCKING CHRIST!!! LEARN TO FUCKING READ DIPSHIT!!!

I never claimed you said anything about Piss Christ. You said "You don't think that doing something you KNOW will offend others and yet you still do it isn't inciting lawless behavior? "

And I asked if the EXACT SAME THING held true for the Piss Christ exhibit and response?

Do you FUCKING COMPREHEND NOW dick breath? God I'm sitting here holding my sides laughing so hard at you complete and total CLUELESSNESS, not knowing what the fuck you are talking about.

Tell me, is this a natural talent.. or something you've had to practice and learn over the years?

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're profane advocacy against Christians makes it quite clear you would have no problems with Serrano's work, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

I'm against religion, in all forms, dim bulb. Just because I don't advocate religion, doesn't mean I would enjoy a crucifix in a jar of piss. I can be ambivalent, or is that too much nuance for your tiny brain to process? You've fallen victim to the disease that seems to be spreading around here. If someone is 'this', then they must by extension be 'this'. It's such a simplistic way of thinking.

[RedLeg505]

Originally Posted by shanm

You know why I come here?

It's to watch dunces like you pretend to have opinions worth a damn. You'd need half a wit to become less than a half-wit.

And you need about 3 asses to become a half ass. Ok.. now that we've both done the "school yard" name calling thing.. got anything actually worth a damn to say?

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by RedLeg505

How are they NOT the same goddamn thing? In BOTH cases, you have "free speech" advocates claiming a right to do things that religious members find objectionable and both result in "violence".

But you only blame this anti-Muslim event, but not the anti-Christian event.

Why is that?

Originally Posted by RedLeg505

Jesus FUCKING CHRIST!!! LEARN TO FUCKING READ DIPSHIT!!!

I never claimed you said anything about Piss Christ. You said "You don't think that doing something you KNOW will offend others and yet you still do it isn't inciting lawless behavior? "

And I asked if the EXACT SAME THING held true for the Piss Christ exhibit and response?

Do you FUCKING COMPREHEND NOW dick breath? God I'm sitting here holding my sides laughing so hard at you complete and total CLUELESSNESS, not knowing what the fuck you are talking about.

Tell me, is this a natural talent.. or something you've had to practice and learn over the years?

There's the proof. At that point, I'd said nothing about the piss christ. Nothing. And yet you assumed my response for me. I don't have a problem comprehending well-written prose, but no one would ever accuse you of that.

Why does one thing have to be true for another thing? Why this need to equate both things. Christians were absolutely enraged by piss christ. Muslims get enraged about depictions of the prophet. So what?

[RedLeg505]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I posted a link that showed you were a fucking liar and suddenly you disappeared. Keep bullshitting, motherfucker.

ROFL.. Sorry to disappoint.. but unlike you.. I actually go to work and spend time away from here. I'm sure you can keep yourself occupied for hours jerking off waiting for me to return.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by RedLeg505

And you need about 3 asses to become a half ass. Ok.. now that we've both done the "school yard" name calling thing.. got anything actually worth a damn to say?

I really hope that avatar isn't your wife... jeebus crabst

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Keep lying, chickenshit. I didn't popularly receive shit. Your problem is thinking that everyone is the same because they have a certain letter by their name.

Your profane denigration of Christians surpasses Serrano's denigrating work, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I'm against religion, in all forms, dim bulb. Just because I don't advocate religion, doesn't mean I would enjoy a crucifix in a jar of piss. I can be ambivalent, or is that too much nuance for your tiny brain to process? You've fallen victim to the disease that seems to be spreading around here. If someone is 'this', then they must by extension be 'this'. It's such a simplistic way of thinking.

You're "that" because you've demonstrated you are "that", you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Your profane denigration of Christians surpasses Serrano's denigrating work, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.



You're "that" because you've demonstrated you are "that", you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

How so? Your denigration of gays has shown you to be a cunt. So what?

[RedLeg505]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Why does one thing have to be true for another thing? Why this need to equate both things. Christians were absolutely enraged by piss christ. Muslims get enraged about depictions of the prophet. So what?

"Christians were absolutely enraged by piss Christ."

So..was the museum that put the display on "at fault" for provoking a reaction they knew could be violent? Yes or No? If "Draw Mohammed" was at fault.. then the Museum must be at fault too.. right?

Ohh..and by the way. Do you know how many died in the "violent" reaction to Piss Christ? Because I have the body count for "Draw Mohammed".. 2 dickwad wanna be jihadists from Arizona that are now learning if the claim of virgins is correct or not.