Nancy Reagan wants Hillary to Win

[SeekingTruth]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

This probably gave fox news palpitations. The wife of the great conservative icon wants Hillary to win.

http://drudgereport.com.co/nancy-rea...illary-to-win/

Then don't vote for her. I am not going to, personally speaking, because I believe she backs the special interest groups. I still cannot understand how "first ladies" can back their man when their man is so corrupt, speaking of I dare not see, but wives of the most corrupt.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Senility???

Yes, you are...

[SeekingTruth]

Originally Posted by shanm

According to Trending Idiot, this means that Ronald Reagan himself would have been for a Hillary Clinton presidency in 2016!

That must be horrifying, seeing your party's "an historic leader" endorse a democratic candidate like that!
I guess now they'll have to follow in lockstep and stop creating a dozen stupid, irrelevant threads about HRC everyday

From what I have learned from "unbiased news'. . ."reaganomics" desroyed the economy for the working class. I still will never understand a woman who backs an elected leader without ever questioning his morals. What kind of first ladies do we have, or do we need a woman independent of her male partner to make the decisions that count?

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by SeekingTruth

From what I have learned from "unbiased news'. . ."reaganomics" desroyed the economy for the working class. I still will never understand a woman who backs an elected leader without ever questioning his morals. What kind of first ladies do we have, or do we need a woman independent of her male partner to make the decisions that count?

Trickle down, reaganomics, supply side, whatever you want to call it, can definitely be viewed as the reason for many problems due to deregulation.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by SeekingTruth

From what I have learned from "unbiased news'. . ."reaganomics" desroyed the economy for the working class. I still will never understand a woman who backs an elected leader without ever questioning his morals. What kind of first ladies do we have, or do we need a woman independent of her male partner to make the decisions that count?

Maybe sociopathic women like a powerful, sociopathic man?

[JD Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

This probably gave fox news palpitations. The wife of the great conservative icon wants Hillary to win.

http://drudgereport.com.co/nancy-rea...illary-to-win/

I could be unkind to Nancy and say (like so many democrats did about Ronald) that she doesn't know what she is saying but then, I would be acting like a democrat.

I could be unkind to Baby Killer and say that is (at present) a third hand report about a second hand interview that may be out of context and it means nothing until it is explained.

I do recall TV Guide reporting in 1996 that Ronald Reagan said that he supported Bill Clinton... that's not exactly true. What TV Guide reported to great fanfare was that Ronald Reagan would not vote for George H. W. Bush. So RR must think kindly of Bill Clinton was their interpretation. RR publicly disavowed the TV Guide statement and TVG quietly accepted that they may have been mistaken.

The sad truth (I know, Baby Klller does not deal in truth) is that it matters to no one what Nancy Reagan thinks. It is far more likely that she doesn't know who is running for the GOP nomination (except for Marco Rubio) like about 80% of the American people. Wait until about May of next year.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Yes, you are...

Keep on dick gobbling and ball bobbing whiffy.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Keep on dick gobbling and ball bobbing whiffy.

Senility behooves you...

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I could be unkind to Nancy and say (like so many democrats did about Ronald) that she doesn't know what she is saying but then, I would be acting like a democrat.

I could be unkind to Baby Killer and say that is (at present) a third hand report about a second hand interview that may be out of context and it means nothing until it is explained.

I do recall TV Guide reporting in 1996 that Ronald Reagan said that he supported Bill Clinton... that's not exactly true. What TV Guide reported to great fanfare was that Ronald Reagan would not vote for George H. W. Bush. So RR must think kindly of Bill Clinton was their interpretation. RR publicly disavowed the TV Guide statement and TVG quietly accepted that they may have been mistaken.

The sad truth (I know, Baby Klller does not deal in truth) is that it matters to no one what Nancy Reagan thinks. It is far more likely that she doesn't know who is running for the GOP nomination (except for Marco Rubio) like about 80% of the American people. Wait until about May of next year.

My name doesn't have anything to do with baby killing you cum guzzler. It's the name of a porno. Large dicks get up in guts, hence womb raider. You wouldn't know anything about kidney shifting, pea shooter.

[JD Barleycorn]

Hitting the cervix is painful I've been told. You sound proud of causing pain to women (like you have really done that with your little frank) and a womb is where they used to keep babies (has that changed too?). Your name says it all...Baby Killer and you've said the rest...woman abuser. Your mother must be so proud.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Hitting the cervix is painful I've been told. You sound proud of causing pain to women (like you have really done that with your little frank) and a womb is where they used to keep babies (has that changed too?). Your name says it all...Baby Killer and you've said the rest...woman abuser. Your mother must be so proud.

You've crossed the line. I've never done any such thing in my entire life. You're a lowlife piece of shit. Do not address me in any manner going forward. Period.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Senility behooves you...

Cocksucken behooves you.

[5T3V3]

Tales from the idiocracy .... Brawndo's got electrolytes.


IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by 5T3V3

Tales from the idiocracy .... Brawndo's got electrolytes.


IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!
IT IS FAKE!

Of course it is fake! The thread was started by the biggest lying fraud on eccie - wombhater aka undercunt aka the freelance faggot from Arkansas! The link is as fake as his "new" handle! He freelances and writes for fake websites, then dumps the fake stories over here just to fuck with everyone.

.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

You've crossed the line.

You have "lines"? Or are your "lines" for everyone else?

No wonder you support Hillarious. You all lack the same principles.