Hillary starts her down hill run.....in the polls.

[JD Barleycorn]

Don't want to burst your bubble but the LA Times is not the most independent paper in the land. I don't see any citation in their story so I have to assume that it came from the Obama campaign itself. You have not proven anything. Do some digging because you are trying to prove something and we don't think it's out there.

I do think it is informative that he (according to the LA Times) sides with slumlords over poor tennants. Whats up with that?

How about the liberal New York Times about his "teaching" days. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/us...anted=all&_r=0 A lot of red flags in this fawning article from July of 2008.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Don't want to burst your bubble but the LA Times is not the most independent paper in the land. I don't see any citation in their story so I have to assume that it came from the Obama campaign itself. You have not proven anything. Do some digging because you are trying to prove something and we don't think it's out there.

I do think it is informative that he (according to the LA Times) sides with slumlords over poor tennants. Whats up with that?

How about the liberal New York Times about his "teaching" days. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/us...anted=all&_r=0 A lot of red flags in this fawning article from July of 2008.

That's rich, coming from someone who in my short time here, has to be one of the worst at stating things without any backing facts AT ALL. You stated it as fact that he had never held a job as a lawyer. That's false. If you really wanted to find out, you could have googled it just as I did. But you aren't interested in finding out. You'd rather continue on stewing in your blind hatred.

http://www.boston.com/news/education...ghts_practice/

http://content.time.com/time/magazin...750742,00.html

http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifest...htmlstory.html

PS - so you believe the bad part, but they're not worth believing about the other part regarding his work history. Not that you needed to, because it's plain as day, but you're exposed.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

That's rich, coming from someone who in my short time here, has to be one of the worst at stating things without any backing facts AT ALL.

We have come to expect that from JDIdiot! Who will ever forget his classic conspiracy theory from a little over a year ago? Pay close attention! You will get a huge laugh out of this one.

In typical JDIdiot fashion, he concocted a wild, outlandish story that the Malaysian 777 might not have crashed, after all. Instead he claimed the plane could have been hijacked and parked on some remote, deserted island. It was under the cover of camouflaged netting material, supplemented by thousands upon thousands of shrubs.

Let's give JDIdiot a hand!

You can't just make that shit up!

[JD Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

That's rich, coming from someone who in my short time here, has to be one of the worst at stating things without any backing facts AT ALL. You stated it as fact that he had never held a job as a lawyer. That's false. If you really wanted to find out, you could have googled it just as I did. But you aren't interested in finding out. You'd rather continue on stewing in your blind hatred.

http://www.boston.com/news/education...ghts_practice/

http://content.time.com/time/magazin...750742,00.html

http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifest...htmlstory.html

PS - so you believe the bad part, but they're not worth believing about the other part regarding his work history. Not that you needed to, because it's plain as day, but you're exposed.

Starting with another lie are we? I did not "state" anywhere that Obama was not a lawyer. What I wrote was that Obama never practiced law. A litigator (someone who actually goes to court) looks down on the fixers like Obama. They use the rules and not the power of persuasion or the evidence to win their points.

I did bing it (google is evil) and it came up with only the one newspaper article that you posted. I take it that you didn't read my post then. Your great savior is whore, plain and simple.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

When you deal in absolutes, it's easy to find rebuttals. No, he didn't just spend four years with a law license. He was hired by Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Gallard in Chicago. He actually worked about 30 cases in 4 years. He even argued a case before a federal appellate court. Anything else you want to know?

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/apr...na-obamalegal6

I will clarify that .... he may have WORKED ON 30 cases ... just like a secretary in their firm WORKED ON 30 cases. 4 years of "practicing law" is having a "law license" for 4 years. But hang on ... let's see if the information came from the campaign or the court records.

This came out of your article:

"He was doing the work that any first-year or second-year associate would do," Miner said. "In litigation, he was doing basic research and writing memos. . . . In the first couple years he would play a very minor role. He wouldn't know [much], so he would take the lead from whoever was supervising his work."

It appears from the article that it is disputing Obminable's claims about being a "civil rights" attorney .... I don't see one reference in which he is reported as having TRIED any civil rights cases ... he may have drafted some pleadings UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A SENIOR ATTORNEY .. as well as "argue" a case, but I will attempt to look up the case, since there is not case number or style.....

... the problem is: I have to look it up by his name, and "we" don't know what name he used back then!!!!


As President of the United States:
He wouldn't know [much], so he would take the lead from whoever was supervising his work."

Some people just never change.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

You'd rather continue on stewing in your blind hatred.

Your BLIND LOVE trumps any "blind hatred"!

30 cases in 4 years? 7-8 cases a year. That's less than 1 a month.

That's encouraging though: Not many civil rights violations in Chicago!!!!!!!

(Especially since MOST OF THOSE weren't even "civil rights" cases.)

"Anything else you want to know?"

Actually, no. I've read enough to know bullshit when I see it. You are too easily impressed, which is based on your "love" of the guy.

BTW: I don't "hate" him. I just don't have any respect for him. He's fluff.

[JD Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by bigtex

We have come to expect that from JDIdiot! Who will ever forget his classic conspiracy theory from a little over a year ago? Pay close attention! You will get a huge laugh out of this one.

In typical JDIdiot fashion, he concocted a wild, outlandish story that the Malaysian 777 might not have crashed, after all. Instead he claimed the plane could have been hijacked and parked on some remote, deserted island. It was under the cover of camouflaged netting material, supplemented by thousands upon thousands of shrubs.

Let's give JDIdiot a hand!

You can't just make that shit up!

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...DAC26CF3B10FA5

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...E4F9B6EB7D0094

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9fN0Nx4Zcs

Want to argue with these people. They advance the same theory.

I've also decided that when flight 370 shows back up that Tampon owes me a blowjob....and he had better do a good job.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

...when flight 370 shows back up that Tampon owes me a blowjob....and he had better do a good job.

Hopefully, it won't "show back up" in Houston unannounced.

He may not have any lips left to pay off the bet. In fact there may not be anything left to which lips could be attached. So BigTits will have "hedged" another bet .... unless he has "escaped" to the Austin area....... then he'll be ok so long as the prevailing breeze is not from the Southeast.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Starting with another lie are we? I did not "state" anywhere that Obama was not a lawyer. What I wrote was that Obama never practiced law. A litigator (someone who actually goes to court) looks down on the fixers like Obama. They use the rules and not the power of persuasion or the evidence to win their points.

I did bing it (google is evil) and it came up with only the one newspaper article that you posted. I take it that you didn't read my post then. Your great savior is whore, plain and simple.

I'm sure he's concerned with what other douchebag lawyers think of him. He's the president. They're just scumbag lawyers. You did say he never worked in a law firm. That was incorrect. I don't expect any correction on your part though, you've proven in a short time to be a dumbass.

My savior is whore. You really need to take some remedial writing courses. I read your article. I deem it from a 'non-trustworthy' source. Sorry, you've proven nothing.

[JD Barleycorn]

Now you're playing Clinton style.

I checked. You lied again. I did not write that part about Obama not working for law firm. You have to pick the crack of my ass now.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Not exactly accurate are you?
Half the people in the country have a bachelors degree from somewhere. What was his class standing?
What exactly does a community organizer do? What notable achievement did he achieve while an organizer?
He did go to law school at Harvard as did so many others but what was his class standing? You say he had honors? What were they? Show us the proof?
Editor of the law review? Yep, there was the year that they started affirmative action at the Law Review. He never published one single article his entire time there when the average editor publishes once a month. Doesn't sound like much of an achievement. What issues did the Review take on while he was the editor?
He NEVER practiced law anywhere just like Hillary.
Being elected to anything is not a personal achievement. It takes a team and how Obama got elected was pretty scummy even for a democrat. To become a state senator Obama had his people (we are assuming that he actually gave the orders) disqualify the other candidates by going through their petitions for candidacy.
To win the senate race his offices releases the sealed records of his opponent's divorce proceedings.

However the real question concerns what has he taken on. What has he bled for? Where did he put everything on the line (according to the rules) and come out a winner? Even for Obamacare he had to lie and decieve to get those last couple of votes. I don't even expect Obamacare to survive the next five years.

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Now you're playing Clinton style.

I checked. You lied again. I did not write that part about Obama not working for law firm. You have to pick the crack of my ass now.

Yes, you did. I've gone to the trouble of quoting it, so you aren't misunderstood. You said he never practiced law. The truth is, he did.

As for playing Clinton style, you have no idea...

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I've also decided that when flight 370 shows back up that Tampon owes me a blowjob....and he had better do a good job.

JDIdiot is now sharing (for all to see) his gay fantasy's about other guys giving him "a blowjob."

Shouldn't the successor to the Patriarchal Idiot Throne be advertising his secret homosexual desires in the "Another Realm" forum? Perhaps JDIdiot will find someone to take him up on his "gay wager" in that forum.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

I will clarify that .... he may have WORKED ON 30 cases ... just like a secretary in their firm WORKED ON 30 cases. 4 years of "practicing law" is having a "law license" for 4 years. But hang on ... let's see if the information came from the campaign or the court records.

This came out of your article:

"He was doing the work that any first-year or second-year associate would do," Miner said. "In litigation, he was doing basic research and writing memos. . . . In the first couple years he would play a very minor role. He wouldn't know [much], so he would take the lead from whoever was supervising his work."

It appears from the article that it is disputing Obminable's claims about being a "civil rights" attorney .... I don't see one reference in which he is reported as having TRIED any civil rights cases ... he may have drafted some pleadings UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A SENIOR ATTORNEY .. as well as "argue" a case, but I will attempt to look up the case, since there is not case number or style.....

... the problem is: I have to look it up by his name, and "we" don't know what name he used back then!!!!


As President of the United States:
He wouldn't know [much], so he would take the lead from whoever was supervising his work."

Some people just never change.

Who takes the lead in ANY job right from the start? An intelligent person defers to people who might have more experience. You wouldn't know anything about that though. He did appear before a federal appellate court. I see you left that out.

[JD Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by bigtex

JDIdiot is now sharing (for all to see) his gay fantasy's about other guys giving him "a blowjob."

Shouldn't the successor to the Patriarchal Idiot Throne be advertising his secret homosexual desires in the "Another Realm" forum? Perhaps JDIdiot will find someone to take him up on his "gay wager" in that forum.

Not really. I know (we all know) that you don't pay your debts so I'm giving you an opportunity to both make amends for being wrong and not losing any money. I understand that every dollar counts for you.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Not really. I know (we all know) that you don't pay your debts so I'm giving you an opportunity to both make amends for being wrong and not losing any money. I understand that every dollar counts for you.

Yes really!

JDIdiot, if you were not openly fantasizing about giving or receiving a blowjob from another guy, why would you have even brought the subject up in the first place? It is obvious that is something that you are wanting to make happen.

Sooner rather than later!

The thought of making a blowjob wager with you or anyone else, (male or female), has never occurred to me. That is, until you brought it up in this thread. That being the case, I have now (and never will have), a blowjob debt to pay (or recieve). Especially with another guy!

Just because you are openly fantasizing about making blowjob wagers with another guy, doesn't mean everyone else does.

My unsolicited advice, start posting your gay fantasy's in 'Another Realm.' Perhaps you will find another male to wager a blowjob with in that forum.