Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
650 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
408 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
George Spelvin |
294 |
Starscream66 |
293 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
sharkman29 |
261 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 71159 | biomed1 | 66276 | Yssup Rider | 62184 | gman44 | 54363 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 49267 | WTF | 48272 | pyramider | 46397 | bambino | 44154 | The_Waco_Kid | 38968 | CryptKicker | 37366 | Mokoa | 36499 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Unique_Carpenter | 33203 |
|
|
View Poll Results: Is "The Domain" a generic enough reference to be listed as a location in a review?
|
Yes
|
  
|
33 |
55.93% |
No
|
  
|
26 |
44.07% |
02-04-2015, 07:08 PM
|
#1
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 17, 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 18,583
|
Is "The Domain" too specific a location for a review?
At least one lady here is convinced that listing "The Domain" as the location in a review is a security/privacy concern and badgers her reviewers until they change it.
I. personally, consider "The Domain" to be a generic reference, such as "The Arboretum", "The Vagina Triangle®", or "Downtown".
Just curious if the majority agree with me, or if I'm really becoming bat-shit crazy...
ztonk
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
02-04-2015, 07:14 PM
|
#2
|
Hope I haven't bored you!
Join Date: Apr 30, 2009
Location:
Posts: 19,472
|
Very generic......
There is what... 3 hotels and a few hundred Condos/apartments?
Since when do the providers edit the reviews?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
02-04-2015, 07:30 PM
|
#3
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Apr 25, 2009
Location: sa tx usa
Posts: 15,261
|
If it is not a specific brick and mortal landmark, nope.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
02-04-2015, 07:41 PM
|
#4
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Nov 28, 2014
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,455
|
Just tell her you will meet her at the Domain tomorrow at noon with $1000 cash as a gift.
If she can find you it's hers if not then she has to pay you.
Maybe that'll bring her back to earth.
|
|
Quote
 | 3 users liked this post
|
02-04-2015, 07:47 PM
|
#5
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 22, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 18,471
|
No The Domain area refers from mopac all the way to Parmer and Metric, Braker to 183, considerable area.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
02-04-2015, 07:47 PM
|
#6
|
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 14, 2011
Location: Welcome Sections
Posts: 35,944
|
Hookers go figure! Next the Vagina Triangle will be too specific. Geeez!
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
02-04-2015, 08:26 PM
|
#7
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Apr 25, 2009
Location: sa tx usa
Posts: 15,261
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockerrick
No The Domain area refers from mopac all the way to Parmer and Metric, Braker to 183, considerable area.
|
Sounds like something is wrong with her concept of spatial relations.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
02-04-2015, 08:52 PM
|
#8
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 29, 2011
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,957
|
oops, voted wrong in the poll. Guess I need to read gooder.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
02-04-2015, 09:26 PM
|
#9
|
Account Disabled
User ID: 5430
Join Date: Jan 4, 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,933
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Nice poll. I hope you get your answer.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
02-04-2015, 09:55 PM
|
#10
|
Thank God it's Firday!
Join Date: Dec 12, 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,709
|
"The Domain" proper is the area between Braker, Burnet, Mopac, and the railroad track, minus a bit on the North. Roughly 1 mile by 1/2 mile. There are actual trademarks and the owners of the businesses and trademarks involved.
If you imply it's in the actual Domain, the businesses involved may feel a little more inclined to harass us nasty whores and whoremongers. Simon Properties is sometimes somewhat schizo. The local nutjobs and busybodies might see it as something they need to stop.
I presume the hotels know it goes on, but appreciate the money as long as there is no trouble and they can act like they don't know.
I say to just keep it safe and say something like "near the Domain," "Domain Area," or Mopac/Braker area. MoPac/Braker gets the Domain, the Arboretum, the braker/mopac/183 triangle, a number of nearby apartments, etc. That tells the guy as much as he needs to know.
I think only the Westin is actually in the Domain. The La Quinta and Fairfield are not in the Domain proper.
If the lady has concerns, I'd definitely recommend changing it from "The Domain" to a more generic term.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
02-04-2015, 09:58 PM
|
#11
|
Account Disabled
User ID: 5430
Join Date: Jan 4, 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,933
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GneissGuy
If the lady has concerns, I'd definitely recommend changing it from "The Domain" to a more generic term.
|
You and a couple of other guys are sorely missed as mods.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
02-04-2015, 10:02 PM
|
#12
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 21, 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockerrick
No The Domain area refers from mopac all the way to Parmer and Metric, Braker to 183, considerable area.
|
That's a little over generous in terms of land area. Taking all the way to 183 overlaps some of the traditional arboretum area. Generally, I'd limit the defined area to that specifically laid out by the developers. If you had to expand it, I'd only take the area bound by Mopac, Braker, and Burnet, and maybe anything that fronts those streets.
In fact, if you were to take the strict definition of The Arboretum, she'd have a better argument, since there's only 1 hotel and no apartments/condos.
Personally, I think of the two areas as one big area anyway. We just need a more compact term form the combined entities. How about this, the area bound by MoPac, 183, and Braker is now in old Austin planning circles as The Golden Triangle.
Perhaps considering the ladies who usually work out of this area, the name should fit for the larger area?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
02-04-2015, 10:03 PM
|
#13
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 7, 2011
Location: Calling out the Bullshit!
Posts: 1,921
|
I think some people didn't read the poll before they voted.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
02-04-2015, 10:10 PM
|
#14
|
Account Disabled
User ID: 5430
Join Date: Jan 4, 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,933
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dante0322
I think some people didn't read the poll before they voted.
|
Oh of course, that MUST be it.
Or maybe they just read "or if I'm really becoming bat-shit crazy..."
and were compelled to click yes.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
02-04-2015, 11:59 PM
|
#15
|
Hope I haven't bored you!
Join Date: Apr 30, 2009
Location:
Posts: 19,472
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GneissGuy
I think only the Westin is actually in the Domain. The La Quinta and Fairfield are not in the Domain proper.
|
Aloft Austin and Lonestar Court are both IN the Domain. I've seen a lady at Lonestar Court as well as one of the Condos..... I've had an Outcall to the Westin that started with drinks in the lobby bar.........
Never a hint of an issue.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|