Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Is there one rule for Pro Obama "cut n paste" threads and a different word count for Anti Obama threads ?
To be fair, it seems that Pro Obama threads should be allowed a 2x factor over the anti Obama threads - based on my observations. The Pro Obama people need all the help they can get.
This ain't ; some nuclear rules still apply:edited by - dh
Quote:
#9 - No form of private communications between members are to be posted in our forums. This includes the contents of emails, PMs, IMs, private chat logs, privately shared images, etc. This is an invasion of another's privacy and will not be allowed.
How many words out of an article can we "cut n paste" before a warning is issued?
Or is it measured by number of paragraphs?
How about images? How many images can we "cut n paste" ? Or not?
You Tea'billies can post no more paragraphs than you can actually read in a day. You're lucky with that rule, if you had to actually understood what ya read, you wouldn't ever get to post!
This ain't edited by - dh; some nuclear rules still apply:
What is this edited by - dh of which you speak?
So, reading between the lines you were given a directive that some of us were obviously not.
I assume you were given an explanation for that directive and why it applies to you and whoever else it may have been sent to and not the entire board or at least the following of this particular forum in the form of a sticky.
I happen to be constrained by a similar directive issued a couple of years ago to a select few. While I did not agree with the directive or the explanation I was given a choice to accept it or not. I chose to accept it as I am still posting. Appeal was not an option considering it came from on high.
It does suck.
Is there one rule for Pro Obama "cut n paste" threads and a different word count for Anti Obama threads ?
To be fair, it seems that Pro Obama threads should be allowed a 2x factor over the anti Obama threads - based on my observations. The Pro Obama people need all the help they can get.
Just saying.
Oh boy, you sound like Jessie Jackson quacking about discrimination. And, you don't see any "pro-Obama" people whining like your bitch-ass about limitations on ridiculous, never-ending, repetitive spam postings to the board, do you? You and that new 'tard spam poster LowRider69 are the ones that will be primarily effected.....
So, reading between the lines you were given a directive that some of us were obviously not.
I assume you were given an explanation for that directive and why it applies to you and whoever else it may have been sent to and not the entire board or at least the following of this particular forum in the form of a sticky.
I happen to be constrained by a similar directive issued a couple of years ago to a select few. While I did not agree with the directive or the explanation I was given a choice to accept it or not. I chose to accept it as I am still posting. Appeal was not an option considering it came from on high.
It does suck.
"Que Sera, Sera!"... Interpret it as you will. But if you're actually waiting for a reply that blatantly answers your question, be forewarned that certain nuclear rules are in place; hence, it's highly improbable that your question will be answered.
NEW RULES AGAINST "CUT N PASTE" THREADS APPARENTLY.
