Not Trying to create Drama But This has to Be explained

[Guest030915]

Originally Posted by AlexisMoore

99% of time it's best to say nothing at all, take the no, and move on....

Let the church say AMEN!

[Guest031015]

There was no price haggling... I was told $350 and via text and i mentioned that her ads and reviews listed $300. Then she said yeah, we each try to cover our hh rate. $300 is fine. If that's price haggling... Then maybe I am wrong on this. She could have just said no. Our rate is now $350 and I would have been fine paying that. I asked her about why the rate change and she replied with no issues at the time and is now saying I haggled? No inconsistencies in my review. I said she was cute and attractive, that had nothing to do with the no review.
Last comment. I'm done with this little drama as amusing at its been.

[tbone77494]

I'm still looking for a $$$ hour with 1/2 hr bbbj by KD followed by 1/2 hr CFS with Stacy. I have tried a couple doubles and i just get frustrated with 6 holes and one dick.

[Sarunga]

Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

I've always wondered about this one and have seen mods rule differently on it over the years. You're right, simple answers are often not clear. So here's the deal, and it's the definitive ruling.

Obviously revealing or specifically referring to other's ROS or other Private content is a violation of Guideline#20.

In regards to discussing/quoting/reiterating your own posts that were private but you now choose to make public, you are allowed to do so. There is no violation as long as, in doing so, you do not reveal anyone else's private content in the process.

The goal of Guideline#20 is to to protect OTHER people's private posts not to disallow sharing of your OWN, similar to being able to reveal your OWN medical condition but not ANOTHER persons.

This prevents restriction of, for instance, making a post in the Men's Lounge and then making the exact same post in Coed in a new thread. Also, in the case of a lady's coed rebuttal of a review such as this one, the gentleman can choose to quote his own review to alleviate concerns or clarify the situation as he chooses.

Without the ability to do so his reputation may be damaged or people without premium access could get the wrong idea as the lady is free to say whatever she wishes but he cannot discuss the session in detail since he has already done so in his review.

I hope that's more clear. And, as Pistolero has said, this is a definitive answer from the powers that be.

Now, this is more like it, Spice.

[Max Steel]

I'm glad those two ignored my post when I sent an inquiry a few months ago.

[Houston.Epicurean]

Rick,

Your story just doesn't ring true for me.

There was no price haggling? *Our rate is now $350 and I would have been fine with paying it?

Then why didn't you pay $350?

She said $300 was fine?

When a woman says fine" things are anything but "fine".

She is now saying you haggled?

She never used the word. I used it. She said you could not meet the quota. Really? You had no access to another $50?.

No inconsistencies in the review? I cited one privately. *I'll cite another privately.



I am no WK and Stacy' asking price is outside my usual price range although I have paid that and more for women I really wanted to see. But last week a client disparaged one of my staff the way I feel you disparaged Stacy and I'm unusually sensitive to this kind of thing right now. The client was just plain wrong, I pointed it out to the client, and the next day the client apologized to my staff member.

I have read some of your other reviews and those encounters seemed to go well. I thank you for your contribution.

In closing, do you really expect a provider to be enthusiastic when you haggle down the price and the short the donation? If you do, this won't be your last no review.

I've learned any disagreements with a provider before service or with a waiter before getting my food usually end badly for me. So I always count the money twice and I never haggle.

If I had any doubts whose story was closer to the truth I don't now. Stacy posted once in this thread. You, 4 times.

As Shakespeare said in Hamlet "The lady (or in this case gentleman) doth protest too much."

[dearhunter]

I am surround by retards

[pyramider]

Yep

[Hot to Trot Daphne]

Originally Posted by dearhunter

I am surround by retards

I have that feeling every now and then too. This shit simply isn't that hard.

[DMike]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

But just not both of them at the same time?

definitely both !

[Althalus]

What sounds weird about this to me, I've never seen a provider I'm seeing for the first time touch, look at, or acknowledge the money in any way. Sometimes, after a few times, they'll put it in their purse or whatever at the end of the session. Actually counting the money in front of me right at the start of the first session would be kinda shocking at this point. Like if she's careless about that, then what else is she being careless about?

I understand doing what you need to do to stay safe in case a client turns out to be LE, but I do wonder what would happen if through some accident or miscommunication I left the wrong amount. FTR, I'd be willing to make it up on the next session.

[dearhunter]

Retarded is starting a threAD over what you think is a "no" review because of $20.......more retarded is being wrong..........even more retarded is white knighting for the whore after the fact.

[GlobeSpotter]

....even more retarded is dropping 300+ to be with "those two" for even a full 30 minutes.

[cr76]

The traffic on 59, but this is a great read

[Guest012715]

Originally Posted by dearhunter

Retarded is starting a threAD over what you think is a "no" review because of $20.......more retarded is being wrong..........even more retarded is white knighting for the whore after the fact.

Please say it one more time, DH!

I'm no WK but.... Now that's funny....