74 school shootings since Sandy Hook. More dead today.

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

i never made that comparison, you did.

your demographic

UnitedKingdom 1 653 Europe Northern Europe 2011
France 1 665 Europe Western Europe 2012
Canada 1.6 543 Americas Northern America 2012
United States 4.8 14,173 Americas Northern America 2012
Spain 0.8 364 Europe Southern Europe 2012
Germany 0.8 662 Europe Western Europe 2011
Denmark 0.8 47 Europe Northern Europe 2012

Mine, using the G8 "standard"

opps! russia is a G8 nation! cite all the craptard studies you want about why Russia can't be included, somehow the rest of the World doesn't agree

and it blows yer argument up.

the G8

Russia 9.2 13,120 Europe Eastern Europe 2012 UnitedKingdom 1 653 Europe Northern Europe 2011
France 1 665 Europe Western Europe 2012
Canada 1.6 543 Americas Northern America 2012
United States 4.8 14,173 Americas Northern America 2012
Germany 0.8 662 Europe Western Europe 2011
Italy 0.9 530 Europe Southern Europe 2012 Japan 0.3 442 Asia Eastern Asia 2011
i didn't bother to sort it so i presume you can read. Russia is the "King" of the G8.

Go back and read post #179 in this thread and then tell me again "I never made that comparison, you did".

My study was conducted by the U.N., about as independent source as you can find. Again, because you are obviously not very bright ("oh, sorry! did i give you the impression i actually read anything you post?" and then you immediately respond to one of my posts), I'll be easy on you.

Your logic is very similar to IB's. Sort of a 3rd grade argument. You show one case where the correlation is invalid I and all the other countless correlations are deemed invalid. And I posted an article earlier about why Russia has a homicide problem. But you don't read my posts. IDIOT.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Go back and read post #179 in this thread and then tell me again "I never made that comparison, you did".

My study was conducted by the U.N., about as independent source as you can find. Again, because you are obviously not very bright ("oh, sorry! did i give you the impression i actually read anything you post?" and then you immediately respond to one of my posts), I'll be easy on you.

Your logic is very similar to IB's. Sort of a 3rd grade argument. You show one case where the correlation is invalid I and all the other countless correlations are deemed invalid. And I posted an article earlier about why Russia has a homicide problem. But you don't read my posts.IDIOT.

You're the "fraidy-cat" 3rd grader hunkering under your bed sucking on your thumb whining and pleading for government agents with guns and laws that abridge the rights of American citizens to come save your 3rd grade, "skeeredy" ass, Speedy.

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Then why have you complained in several of YOUR posts that MY posts on demographics and their correlation to homicides, which was proven 100% valid in the excerpts I posted, are invalid? You are as dumb as IB.

Old-T, I see what you mean. IB has several challengers.

As long as you and about a half-dozen other lib-retarded morons are posting in here, Speedy, there's not a single conservative that has to worry about you and your ilk relinquishing the title of "dumbest".

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

OH! Sorry IBIdiot, would you prefer I agree with the rest of the board and acknowledge you, not your mentally challenged sidekick, as the dumbest person on the board?

Great, it's really a toss up anyway. One chooses to act like you act, the other hasn't the mental capacity to act otherwise.

Congratulations, IBIdiot! In the side by side intelligence test between you and a legal retard, the retard wins!

No wonder you're just so angry in that little closet of yours!

How's that lip-syncing (dick-licking) to Billy Idol's "Rebel Yell" underneath your new LBGT flag working out for you and your boyfriend, you lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM?

[Yssup Rider]

Who's Billy Idol, IBIdiot? One of your favorite redneck rockers? Looks like he knows about YOU!



Figures that you'd know all about that flag! Do you also wear a rainbow sheet and hood?

[IIFFOFRDB]

"What line has to be crossed… before we start mowing them down to make our point?” Murder-bent collectivist harridan Susie Madrak volunteers for the Julius Streicher Memorial Award.


What a 21st Century Advocate of 20th Century Mass Murder Looks Like.



Susie Madrak, who also blogs at Suburban Guerrilla (be sure and go there to admire the masthead of a cartoonish Ms. Madrak wielding a submachinegun and throwing a hand grenade in response to an eviction notice), has put us all on notice at the notorious Crooks and Liars website: "So At What Point Do We Actually Stand Up To The Gun Nuts?" She writes, in part,http://crooksandliars.com/2014/06/so...ally-stand-gun


Rick Perlstein writes about how Democrats completely surrendered our political will to control guns when the Obama administration backed away from the Bundy ranch. And I have to admit, he makes a good point. I assumed the feds would be back later -- as in, a few weeks. How long has it been now? By the time anything actually happens, will it have any real deterrent effect?

But Perlstein doesn't mention the big honkin' elephant in the room: Namely, at what point does the federal government literally go to war with its own citizens? Because we're not talking about bank robbers here, we're talking about (mostly) non-criminal cranks -- scofflaws and political malcontents. So what line has to be crossed in the good old U.S. of A. before we start mowing them down to make our point? Because you can't talk about the Bundy ranch without talking about Ruby Ridge, and Waco.


Several readers brought this collectivist jeremiad of murderous intent to my email inbox and included links to Bob Owens' http://bearingarms.com/line-crossed-...make-point/and Brock Townsend's http://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.co...-time-for.html ...comments.

Ms. Madrak has never been shy about collectivist advocacy of violence, witness this from 2011:http://susiemadrak.com/2011/10/07/october2011-org-22/


"I have to say, as much as I like what the Occupy movement is doing, I think they were wrong to explicitly rule out violence. This country does nothing until the elites feel threatened."



Yes. Well. So the submachinegun and the grenade cartoon was an expression of Ms. Matrak's fondest wishes, perhaps? I wondered immediately, just what this harridan doing in the late sixties? She certainly sounds like an unrepentant member of the Weather Underground. As for myself, I elected to take the collectivist advocate of citizen-murder-by-government harpy by the talons and pluck her feathers directly. To wit,



From: georgemason1776@aol.com

To: suburbanguerrilla@comcast.net

Sent: Thu, Jun 26, 2014 11:21 am

Subject: Congrats on your latest C&L post! Your voluntary self-nomination for the Julius Streicher Memorial Award is duly noted.

"I have to say, as much as I like what the Occupy movement is doing, I think they were wrong to explicitly rule out violence. This country does nothing until the elites feel threatened." -- Susie Madrak, 7 October 2011.


Ms. Madrak,


Several of my readers brought my attention to your Crooks and Liars post entitled "So At What Point Do We Actually Stand Up To The Gun Nuts?" which includes the paragraph:



But Perlstein doesn't mention the big honkin' elephant in the room: Namely, at what point does the federal government literally go to war with its own citizens? Because we're not talking about bank robbers here, we're talking about (mostly) non-criminal cranks -- scofflaws and political malcontents. So what line has to be crossed in the good old U.S. of A. before we start mowing them down to make our point? Because you can't talk about the Bundy ranch without talking about Ruby Ridge, and Waco.



Interesting use of language, the phrase "before we start mowing them down to make our point." Which begs the question, what exactly is "our (your) point"? Citizen disarmament for everyone? I think not. Certainly it is evident that you identify with the present regime's ability to work their will upon people without the possibility of those targeted people to resist. This seems an odd opinion for someone whose website features a cartoon of herself firing a submachinegun and throwing hand grenades in response to an eviction notice. From this contradiction I conclude that your objection is not to weapons in the hands of the people, but simply to weapons in the hands of people with whom you and the present regime disagree with. Well, that is certainly understandable, you being an obviously unrepentant collectivist. As with all such true believers in the various butcher philosophies of the 20th Century, you define "peace" as the silence, imprisonment or death of all who oppose you. I know, I used to be a collectivist myself. (See http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogsp...mericains.html http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogsp...ricains.htmlas well as my talk last year on collectivist lies here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zwz6wEuZks).


It is surprising to run into someone who espouses collectivist tyranny yet who is so honest about it, however. Most collectivists are inveterate liars. If you view my talk on collectivist lies referenced above, you will hear the story of how my daughter once got in trouble at school for defining the difference between a socialist and a communist as: "A socialist is a communist who has not yet found his AK-47 nor the will to use it, whereas a communist is a socialist who HAS found his AK-47 and the will to use it on you." The difference is merely one of self-awareness and opportunity. Yet it is refreshing to have found someone who is so honest and unabashed in her collectivism. Your bloody suit fits you well. You accuse us of "want(ing) a civil war so bad, they (we) can taste it." Yet we merely wish to be left alone from your collectivist meddling and the iron fist of government which you would use to enforce it. It seems to us that it is you who has the hunger for other people's liberty, and property and lives. Frankly, it is your bloody appetites which are the problem here, not ours.


But before you start stacking up our bodies and those of our families in service to your collectivist goals (and how many million of us are you willing to see dead to make your point?), I should have the good manners to remind you that the Law of Unintended Consequences, which can neither be repealed nor its sentences appealed, always applies to both tyrants and wannabes. You may ask Nicolae and Elena Ceausescu about their unexpected Christmas present back in 1989. Unfortunately, you'd have to go to hell to have that particular conversation. (See my post, "'Resistance is Futile': Waco Rules vs. Romanian Rules," at http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogsp...is-futile.html)


Of course you are not a tyrant yourself, you may argue, not even a doorkicker of the kind you suppose will unthinkingly do your bidding to work your will upon the rest of us. You are merely an advocate. Well, then, may I refer you to the case of Hitler's favorite "journalist," Julius Streicher? He started out as an advocate too. That fact did not save him from doing the executioner's jig at Nuremburg. We here at Sipsey Street recognize such present-day collectivist advocates as yourself with the Julius Streicher Memorial Award from time to time. Thus, your voluntary self-nomination for the Julius Streicher Memorial Award is duly noted. Old Julius would be quite proud of your use of marginalizing language to dehumanize your intended victims, to smear their principles as evidence of mental pathology or worse. Yes, you certainly deserve the NOMINATION to the Streicher Award, but I'm afraid you will have to compete with several other previous self-nominations already on file for this year. Whether you deserve to WIN the Award will be determined at a later date. And of course whether you deserve Streicher's fate will be decided by the unseen historical judges who mystically enforce the Law of Unintended Consequences and have done so consistently throughout the centuries. For myself as a Christian, I sincerely hope that you avoid Streicher's fate, no matter how sorely you now tempt it.


But of course I also hope that we avoid the civil war and mass butchery of innocents that you seem to advocating for the rest of us.
Sincerely,

Mike Vanderboegh

The alleged leader of a merry band of Three Percenters

http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com
PO Box 926
Pinson AL 35126

[Yssup Rider]

What is your point, Slobbo?

Oh, I forgot. You never make one.

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

What is your point, Slobbo?

I have to agree. I read through about half the article(s) before I realized I didn't know where it was going.

Iffy, how about YOU making a statement about how YOU feel.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

I have to agree. I read through about half the article(s) before I realized I didn't know where it was going.

Iffy, how about YOU making a statement about how YOU feel.

This is evidence that IB is not the dumbest denizen of this board. IB often says things that are intentionally degrading, but one can usually tell what he is trying to communicate. IIFFYy on the other hand takes up vast amounts of space to cut and paste other people's incomprehensible vomit.

I suspect he might be trying to say that there are Wackos on both ends of the gun debate. But on second thought that would never be his point--he firmly believes we should all mount a GAU-8 on our cars and openly carry a 50 cal as we walk through the grade school playground. To IIFFy and his ilk there are only Wackos on the "other" side.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

What's that your boyfriend hears you cry for with a "Rebel Yell" under your new LBGT banner, you lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM?

Originally Posted by Old-T

This is evidence that IB is not the dumbest denizen of this board. IB often says things that are intentionally degrading, but one can usually tell what he is trying to communicate. IIFFYy on the other hand takes up vast amounts of space to cut and paste other people's incomprehensible vomit.

I suspect he might be trying to say that there are Wackos on both ends of the gun debate. But on second thought that would never be his point--he firmly believes we should all mount a GAU-8 on our cars and openly carry a 50 cal as we walk through the grade school playground. To IIFFy and his ilk there are only Wackos on the "other" side.

Old-Twerp, as long as you, Speedy, and about a half-dozen other lib-retarded morons are posting in here, there's not a single conservative that has to worry about you and your ilk relinquishing the title of "dumbest".

[Old-T]

So you DO support open unlimited carry of GAU-8s and 50 cals! I thought so.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

So you DO support open unlimited carry of GAU-8s and 50 cals! I thought so.

Old-Twerp, you've proved you deserve your honorific title of "dumbest" if you imagine that the M2HB with tripod and ammo is a "one-man carry" weapon, jackass.

[Old-T]

Hmmm, so you have a problem comprehending hyperbole.

[Yssup Rider]

If anything typifies IBIdiot's Old South (or is that Old Back Porch) it's this new flag!



You still haven't answered my questions, IBIdiot, the Insult Comic Twat!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Hmmm, so you have a problem comprehending hyperbole.

This is Old-Twerp's way of admitting he is a troll: a "dumb" troll!

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You didn't answer this question, you lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM: "What's that your boyfriend hears you cry for with a "Rebel Yell" under your new LBGT banner, you lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM?"

[Old-T]

Not at all. It is my way of pointing out my literary skills, even if some in the audience (current company included) are too myopic to comprehend.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Not at all. It is my way of pointing out my literary skills, even if some in the audience (current company included) are too myopic to comprehend.

It has been noted before how you are one of the most myopic and hypocritical jackasses in this forum, Old-Twerp.