Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
No No...its was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-muslim video. Obama and Hillary told us so.
And besides
when Obie called it an act of terror every rightie on this board foamed at the mouth ..
IMO big Al had the attack planned, and took/used the vid as an opportunity to hit the consulate ..... bastards are like coyotes, one howls, and 30 show up for a kill.
regardless of the circumstance, the right did an about face with their flaky ass opinion just like they usually do.
when Obie called it an act of terror every rightie on this board foamed at the mouth ..
IMO big Al had the attack planned, and took/used the vid as an opportunity to hit the consulate ..... bastards are like coyotes, one howls, and 30 show up for a kill.
regardless of the circumstance, the right did an about face with their flaky ass opinion just like they usually do.
What is amusing here is that the knuckledraggers accept as gospel all that Fox News has to offer about Benghazi. But, dismiss without comment the month-long and, in fairness, what appears to be, exhaustive investigation by what is generally regarded as the finest newspaper in the world.
What is amusing here is that the knuckledraggers accept as gospel all that Fox News has to offer about Benghazi. But, dismiss without comment the month-long and, in fairness, what appears to be, exhaustive investigation by what is generally regarded as the finest newspaper in the world.
when Obie called it an act of terror every rightie on this board foamed at the mouth ..
IMO big Al had the attack planned, and took/used the vid as an opportunity to hit the consulate ..... bastards are like coyotes, one howls, and 30 show up for a kill.
regardless of the circumstance, the right did an about face with their flaky ass opinion just like they usually do.
The End
People who cannot remember the past and condemned to repeat it.
When the attack occurred republicans, conservatives, miltary people said it was an act of terrorism. They also demanded to know why our ambassador was outside the embassy in Tripoli on a very dangerous day of the year. There is still no answer to that. We then demanded to know what military actions were taken. None, and there is still no answer to that. They we demanded to know why the FBI waited nearly a month before investigating. There is still no good answer to that either. Then the White House told a huge lie that this was a spontaneous demonstration and blamed it on a video that no one had seen. Hillary promised revenge on those responsible (it turned out to the film maker) and Obama made a little speech about terrorism and 9/11. He never, NEVER called what happened in Benghazi terrorism. He did call it a bump in the road and a "negative outcome". It would be three weeks before someone from the Whitehouse (Jay Carney) would refer to Benghazi as an act of terrorism.
So now, fifteen months later, the New York fish paper wrapper writes a story that exonerates the White House....from what? This was a terrorist attack and it was the White House that implied and then said that it was NOT Al Queida. No one said it was Al Queida but that it was terrorism. So now the New York fish wrapper says that they can prove it was not something that no one but the White House had denied that it was. Confused? They hope you stay that way.
The truth? The right has said from the beginning this looked like terrorism. The White House denied that. It was shown to be terrorism and the White House still denied that until they couldn't. Then they tried to say that they said it first but they didn't. Now the New York Times says it was partly terrorism (how much is too much?) and that the White House is off the hook for the Al Queida story, which was not a story to begin with.
CJ has purple lips and I suspect a purple asshole.
What is amusing here is that the knuckledraggers accept as gospel all that Fox News has to offer about Benghazi. But, dismiss without comment the month-long and, in fairness, what appears to be, exhaustive investigation by what is generally regarded as the finest newspaper in the world.
Pick and choose.
41 different newspapers and magazines looked at the ballots from the 2000 election and they agreed that George Bush won. So now that we've put that to bed I don't expect to see anymore comments about how the election was stolen. Timmie has said so.
when Obie called it an act of terror every rightie on this board foamed at the mouth ..
IMO big Al had the attack planned, and took/used the vid as an opportunity to hit the consulate ..... bastards are like coyotes, one howls, and 30 show up for a kill.
regardless of the circumstance, the right did an about face with their flaky ass opinion just like they usually do.
The End
You're trying to rewrite what Odumbo actually said in the Rose Garden that morning, CBJ7, even Odumbo admitted he didn't call it an "act of terror" -- though he did later lied about it.
KROFT: “Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid the use of the word ‘terrorism’ in connection with the Libya attack.”
OBAMA: “Right.”
KROFT: “Do you believe that this was a terrorist attack?”
OBAMA: “Well, it’s too early to know exactly how this came about, what group was involved, but obviously it was an attack on Americans. And we are going to be working with the Libyan government to make sure that we bring these folks to justice, one way or the other.”
What is amusing here is that the knuckledraggers accept as gospel all that Fox News and the words and statements of people who were there that night has to offer about Benghazi. But, dismiss without comment there have been so many comments the month-long and, in fairness, what appears to be, I guess it depends on how you define exhaustive exhaustive investigation by what is the reality is that it used to be but then they finally admitted that they hid the atrocities of the USSR in order to report on the country generally regarded as the finest newspaper they are no longer the finest and have not been for some time in the world.
Pick and choose.
Fifteen months it took the NYT to make this stuff up but the reality clashes with their story. The video was translated into Arabic a year AFTER the attack. The attack was preplanned unless you want to believe that Arab people walk around with mortars in their back pocket. That is what killed two of the heroes that night, mortar fire. The White House did finally relent and call it terrorism. Why would they do that if evidence said otherwise? Ansar al-Sharia is who the NYT blames for the attack. There are two Ansar al-Sharias in Libya. Both are ideology in league with Bin Laden's Al Queada. One is even ran by former Bin Laden driver and Gitmo detainee Sufian bin Qumu. There are a number of links between the two groups. Even Stevens second in command called it an organized terrorist attack. Do you think a bunch of raggety protesters could overwhelm former Seals? Maybe this thread should have been titled "whistling past the graveyard" pr "sticking your head under the covers".
Benghazi Terrorist attack ,,,
