Why are TS's not considered "Independent Providers" ?

[Whispers]

From a Review of TS/Missy currently located in the "Other Review" section

Originally Posted by Mokoa

On this site we do not judge and we do not segregate.

Whether or not the OP's visit may be interpreted as gay behavior is not the topic for discussion in this thread. Anyone WISHING to discuss it is free to start a thread in another area referencing this one.

I'm sorry...... Can you reference the guidelines that prohibit judging?

I believe each and every day YOU as a Mod judge reviews as well as threads..... You also practice segregation daily as you move and lump information under different headings as you seem to think it applies....

For example...... What type of judgement are you passing on his review of a TS? Is there a reason the review does not belong in the Independent Providers Section?

TS Missy is listed as a "Verified Provider", is provided a Showcase by ECCIE unlike the Street Walkers, can run ads and promote his/herself here on ECCIE and appears to identify more as a woman than a man.

I cannot find a definition of where ECCIE has ruled that TS's, pre or post op, are not Independent Providers.


WWhat criteria are you using to determine placement? What about a "Post-Op" TS? At what point can a TS have the rights of the sex they choose here on ECCIE?

If He/She was managed by an Agency would the Review be in the Agency Section?

Do I WANT to see reviews of girls with dicks in the Independent Provider Section?

Hell No... I don't want to see them period....

But considering that they are going to be allowed...... where you place the review is mot definitely an act of judgement and currently it is being segregated.

So lets not be saying that it isn't being practiced or Hypocrisy needs to be discussed.

[lasvegas]

LOL....

[Mokoa]

Yes, she is an independent provider and there are other reviews of her that are in the Independent Provider Reviews forum. So yes, that review shall go there as well. I could not move it earlier because I had to break off from the site and take care of other matters that needed immediate attention.

My comment...

On this site we do not judge and we do not segregate

was to specifically address the following...

Originally Posted by Hero Zimmerman

Desicates. I think www.gay.com would be a better place for this.

Originally Posted by guy fawkes

...Now maybe THE BOARD should consider a TV\TS review section.

Nothing more.

[guy fawkes]

Now Boy oh Boy I love when things are cut and pasted out of context. So let me put it in CONTEXT. The THREAD started because there was a funny comment made about a review. NOTHING ABOUT SEXUAL PREFERENCE just a funny reaction. Some people thought these reviews should be posted elsewhere. I suggested the above section be added. I received the post about WE DO NOT SEGREGATE. But this SITE does do just that. Women who are moco and I guess not VERIFIED are placed in the others categories just as UTR and many others. The reviews do not go UNDER INDEPENDENT. So there is some segregation.
Just wanted to put in context the CUT AND PASTE JOB.

[flinde]

just don't let it happen again, monks.

[Precious_b]

Guy, you have the incorrect meaning of the way segregate was used.

[guy fawkes]

Guy, you have the incorrect meaning of the way segregate was used.

Sorry, I'll wait and see if he post HIS explanation of the word.

AND for FYI- I was more interested in the ENTIRE context- which would give full meaning of my response.

segregate-set apart from the rest or from each other; isolate or divide.

And BTW The definition is the same in Webster

[Mokoa]

Originally Posted by guy fawkes

Sorry, I'll wait and see if he post HIS explanation of the word.

AND for FYI- I was more interested in the ENTIRE context- which would give full meaning of my response.


And BTW The definition is the same in Webster

If one uses the icon that appears within the quoted post one will be taken to the original post where it can be seen in its entirety. I only quoted what I did because that was the only part of your post I was addressing.

[bigplayantx]

Originally Posted by Whispers

Do I WANT to see reviews of girls with dicks in the Independent Provider Section?

Hell No... I don't want to see them period....

I think this is his point!

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by bigplayantx

I think this is his point!

If so, *I* think Mokoa response was not to treat these reviews any differently.

That is until the site creates an area for them.
Thread about that has already been done.