Point of Order:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victoria Lane
.......THERE ARE ALWAYS TWO SIDES TO EVERY STORY!!!!!
|
VL nudged the door open here as to her being the hooktard in question
Quote:
Originally Posted by jokacz
Three sides to every story.
Don't forget the truth.
|
jkz nudged the door back closed here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victoria Lane
LOL Jokacz.
Very true. But in this case the story basically only had two sides.
|
VL kicked the door open here........so, she has no one to blame but herself for her exposure in this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victoria Lane
Ok GBOF you want to out my name? .........
|
VL attempts to blame GBOF for her own potty mouth......must be some of those excellent communication skills.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victoria Lane
......Jonballs......this has NOTHING to do with you, ..........why are you writting in private so I can't respond to it and defend myself? .............
|
How would VL know whether JB did or did not post anything in "private"? The act of acknowledging that you have access to board communication that you should not have is a violation that carries a ban as the consequence.
When a hooktard/fucktard acknowledges by statement or response to said private commentary that they know that information, they are in violation of Guideline #20. As a fucktard/hooktard does not have access to the area (Powder Room, InfoShare, Men's Lounge, ROS & "Private Tags") where the normal assessed penalty is a loss of access, it has been determined by modtardville that they will lose access to the area where they posted the violation (ie. the general board). The penalty for this infraction is typically determined by the attitude of the offender. If the offender is forthcoming with the retard who gave them the information (and that retard acknowledges his/her participation), they both share a short vacation of a few days. If the fucktard/hooktard tells the modtard investigating to fuck off, the punishment goes up from there.
ijs