BENGHAZI: OBAMA PROMISED ALL THOSE INVOVLED IN THE ATTACK WOULD BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE .....HAHAHAHA !

[Whirlaway]

Or course she is a liar; has been for decades; she is a congential liar..............

[Jackie S]

Hillary, aka Mrs. Bill Clinton, took full responsibility.

Case Closed. She is invulnerable.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Or course she is a liar; has been for decades; she is a congential liar..............

of course you misunderstood my comment

[timpage]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

No she wasn't............not in her Jan. 23 testimony before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee....................a nd in the testimony she misled Congress on a number of key issues.

Fucking moron.

And in later testimony she was placed under oath and lied ! But of course the GOP will do nothing..just like Holder getting away with his lies.

Just because the Obama administration is good at managing their scandals doesn't mean the scandals don't exist.

Fucking tool.

Oh, they should put you in charge of it. You whine about how nobody questions her, then deflect and claim she was a liar when somebody points out you've got your head up your ass. If she was lying, why didn't one of the idiots you elected nail her down on it via cross-examination and evidence? Because there isn't any?

Quacking fucking idiot. Keep making shit up, repeating it over and over and maybe somebody besides the rest of the mouth-breathers on here will believe you. But, I seriously fucking doubt it.

You know I'm correct, your responses are lame and half-hearted. Just fall back on your mindless sloganeering. It's what you do best. And, as somebody pointed out, you don't really even do that.....you get all your bullshit from the right wing whacko websites and radio shows. All you do is come in hear and repeat stupid shit that some other stupid shit thought up.....shameless knucklehead.

[Whirlaway]

I can understand you want to derail the investigation and NOT have the facts disclosed........but that isn't going to happen.....despite the Administration's attempts to shut the House GOP down, it continues...and more revelations continue...the American public will get to the truth; it will be ugly and they likely won't care what happend. but the historical record will be set.

But make no mistake; at the time of the incident Obama (and his minions) lied and spun the story....they framed an innocent man for what happened at Benghazi...and they have continued to stonewall and lie about the facts............

FACT JACK !

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

I can understand you want to derail the investigation and NOT have the facts disclosed........but that isn't going to happen.....despite the Administration's attempts to shut the House GOP down, it continues...and more revelations continue...the American public will get to the truth; it will be ugly and they likely won't care what happend. but the historical record will be set.

But make no mistake; at the time of the incident Obama (and his minions) lied and spun the story....they framed an innocent man for what happened at Benghazi...and they have continued to stonewall and lie about the facts............

FACT JACK !

and you just continue

[EXTXOILMAN]

What difference at this point does it make?

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++

Exclusive: Dozens of CIA operatives on the ground during Benghazi attack

CNN has uncovered exclusive new information about what is allegedly happening at the CIA, in the wake of the deadly Benghazi terror attack.

Four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, were killed in the assault by armed militants last September 11 in eastern Libya.

Sources now tell CNN dozens of people working for the CIA were on the ground that night, and that the agency is going to great lengths to make sure whatever it was doing, remains a secret.

CNN has learned the CIA is involved in what one source calls an unprecedented attempt to keep the spy agency's Benghazi secrets from ever leaking out.

Since January, some CIA operatives involved in the agency's missions in Libya, have been subjected to frequent, even monthly polygraph examinations, according to a source with deep inside knowledge of the agency's workings.

The goal of the questioning, according to sources, is to find out if anyone is talking to the media or Congress.

It is being described as pure intimidation, with the threat that any unauthorized CIA employee who leaks information could face the end of his or her career.

In exclusive communications obtained by CNN, one insider writes, "You don't jeopardize yourself, you jeopardize your family as well."

Another says, "You have no idea the amount of pressure being brought to bear on anyone with knowledge of this operation."

"Agency employees typically are polygraphed every three to four years. Never more than that," said former CIA operative and CNN analyst Robert Baer.

In other words, the rate of the kind of polygraphs alleged by sources is rare. "If somebody is being polygraphed every month, or every two months it's called an issue polygraph, and that means that the polygraph division suspects something, or they're looking for something, or they're on a fishing expedition. But it's absolutely not routine at all to be polygraphed monthly, or bi-monthly," said Baer.

CIA spokesman Dean Boyd asserted in a statement that the agency has been open with Congress. "The CIA has worked closely with its oversight committees to provide them with an extraordinary amount of information related to the attack on U.S. facilities in Benghazi," the statement said.

"CIA employees are always free to speak to Congress if they want," the statement continued. "The CIA enabled all officers involved in Benghazi the opportunity to meet with Congress. We are not aware of any CIA employee who has experienced retaliation, including any non-routine security procedures, or who has been prevented from sharing a concern with Congress about the Benghazi incident."

Among the many secrets still yet to be told about the Benghazi mission, is just how many Americans were there the night of the attack.

A source now tells CNN that number was 35, with as many as seven wounded, some seriously.

While it is still not known how many of them were CIA, a source tells CNN that 21 Americans were working in the building known as the annex, believed to be run by the agency.

The lack of information and pressure to silence CIA operatives is disturbing to U.S. Rep. Frank Wolf, whose district includes CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. "I think it is a form of a cover-up, and I think it's an attempt to push it under the rug, and I think the American people are feeling the same way," said the Republican. "We should have the people who were on the scene come in, testify under oath, do it publicly, and lay it out. And there really isn't any national security issue involved with regards to that," he said.

Wolf has repeatedly gone to the House floor, asking for a select committee to be set-up, a Watergate-style probe involving several intelligence committee investigators assigned to get to the bottom of the failures that took place in Benghazi, and find out just what the State Department and CIA were doing there.

More than 150 fellow Republican members of Congress have signed his request, and just this week eight Republicans sent a letter to the new head of the FBI, James Comey, asking that he brief Congress within 30 days.

In the aftermath of the attack, Wolf said he was contacted by people closely tied with CIA operatives and contractors who wanted to talk. Then suddenly, there was silence. "Initially they were not afraid to come forward. They wanted the opportunity, and they wanted to be subpoenaed, because if you're subpoenaed, it sort of protects you, you're forced to come before Congress. Now that's all changed," said Wolf.

Lawmakers also want to about know the weapons in Libya, and what happened to them.
Speculation on Capitol Hill has included the possibility the U.S. agencies operating in Benghazi were secretly helping to move surface-to-air missiles out of Libya, through Turkey, and into the hands of Syrian rebels.

It is clear that two U.S. agencies were operating in Benghazi, one was the State Department, and the other was the CIA.

The State Department told CNN in an e-mail that it was only helping the new Libyan government destroy weapons deemed "damaged, aged or too unsafe retain," and that it was not involved in any transfer of weapons to other countries.

But the State Department also clearly told CNN, they "can't speak for any other agencies."

The CIA would not comment on whether it was involved in the transfer of any weapons.


http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/08...nghazi-attack/

[CJ7]

and so do you

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

Impressive at least that CNN humiliated the Presidente.

Remember that CNN reporters explored the attack sites and found the ambassador's diaries while the FBI was still "stuck" in Tripoli.

[Whirlaway]

Yep; the Obama administration could care less about getting to the truth of Benghazi, much less holding any of the actors responsible...............thei r offical position is :

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE ?

Originally Posted by gnadfly

Remember that CNN reporters explored the attack sites and found the ambassador's diaries while the FBI was still "stuck" in Tripoli.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Yep; the Obama administration could care less about getting to the truth of Benghazi, much less holding any of the actors responsible...............thei r offical position is :

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE ?

and what truth did the diary contain? .. the writings that said the consulate and the Embassy, and the entire region was a dangerous place to be?

Im fucking shocked

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

and what truth did the diary contain? .. the writings that said the consulate and the Embassy, and the entire region was a dangerous place to be?

Im fucking shocked

If it's so fucking obvious (AS IT IS), then why the fuck did Hildabeast and Odumbo not anticipate and prepare instead of getting caught flat footed and knocked on their deflecting, lying asses, CBJ7???

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

If it's so fucking obvious (AS IT IS), then why the fuck did Hildabeast and Odumbo not anticipate and prepare instead of getting caught flat footed and knocked their deflecting, lying asses, CBJ7???

after the House republicans defunded Embassy spending across the board where would the $$ have come from ?

more needless spending by Obie ?

just another difficult choice made by Republicans ..

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) acknowledged on Wednesday that House Republicans had consciously voted to reduce the funds allocated to the State Department for embassy security since winning the majority in 2010.
On Wednesday morning, CNN anchor Soledad O'Brien asked the Utah Republican if he had "voted to cut the funding for embassy security."
"Absolutely," Chaffetz said. "Look we have to make priorities and choices in this country. We have…15,000 contractors in Iraq. We have more than 6,000 contractors, a private army there, for President Obama, in Baghdad. And we’re talking about can we get two dozen or so people into Libya to help protect our forces. When you’re in tough economic times, you have to make difficult choices. You have to prioritize things.”
For the past two years, House Republicans have continued to deprioritize the security forces protecting State Department personnel around the world. In fiscal year 2011, lawmakers shaved $128 million off of the administration's request for embassy security funding. House Republicans drained off even more funds in fiscal year 2012 -- cutting back on the department's request by $331 million

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

after the House republicans defunded Embassy spending across the board where would the $$ have come from ?

more needless spending by Obie ?

Time and time again you've had that lame-ass, bogus reply shoved back up your deceiving, lying ass so many times, CBJ7, you now need linament.

“It has been suggested that budget cuts are responsible for a lack of security in Benghazi, and I’d like to ask Miss Lamb,” said Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R., Calif.). “You made this decision personally. Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which lead you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Lamb responded, “No, sir.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...katrina-trinko


"Eric Nordstrom, the regional security officer in Libya, told the committee that Deputy Assistant Secretary Charlene Lamb wanted to keep the number of U.S. security personnel in Benghazi "artificially low." Nordstrom said she generally believed that extra security was unnecessary."

http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/1...ost/?hpt=po_c2

[CJ7]

never said not cutting the budget would have stopped Benghazi have I ?

just pointed out the republican congressmans position ... priority, tough decision.

now, that said. last time I checked I didn't give a shit what you say or think ... things haven't changed since then.