Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > Texas > San Antonio > The Sandbox - San Antonio
test
The Sandbox - San Antonio The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here. If it's NOT an adult-themed topic, then it belongs here

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 399
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70822
biomed163693
Yssup Rider61265
gman4453360
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48813
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37409
CryptKicker37231
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-15-2012, 08:12 PM   #61
Laz
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 14, 2011
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 2,280
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAtexas View Post
These would be the same fiscal conservatives who need to educate the poor and middle class but are typically first in line to cut education funding in favor of increased military spending?
The federal government should not be involved in education funding.

If you use the results of the education that we are spending incredible amounts on it should be clear that what we are doing is not working and money is not the problem.

As for the military, that is a core function of the federal government. However, fiscal conservatives do want the military to operate with fiscal responsibility.
Laz is offline   Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 09:04 PM   #62
Rossboss
Valued Poster
 
Rossboss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 23, 2012
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 636
Encounters: 14
Default

You liberals that voted for Hussein Blobama deserve the lying Cretan community-organizer bullshiter you voted for. Arrogance and ignorance all in one special package. Amazing. I hope you don't own any property or stocks because it's all going down.....don't worry, you can still blame Bush.
Rossboss is offline   Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 09:28 PM   #63
SAtexas
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 26, 2012
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 105
Encounters: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laz View Post
The federal government should not be involved in education funding.

If you use the results of the education that we are spending incredible amounts on it should be clear that what we are doing is not working and money is not the problem.

As for the military, that is a core function of the federal government. However, fiscal conservatives do want the military to operate with fiscal responsibility.
So who shold be the ones involved in education funding? Most states are already having budget cuts where they want to cut education funding. All that is doing is shifting the burden from the federal level to the state level.

You said 'If you use the results of the education that we are spending...it is clear that what we are doing is not working" What are you basing this on? I'm not saying it is working, but a general statement with no support isn't worth the time it takes to type it.
SAtexas is offline   Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 09:24 AM   #64
satexasguy
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2, 2010
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,365
Encounters: 34
Default

wow, at least this forum is open to good debate. You should check out similar debates on the national sandbox forum. talk about extremes.

IMO I think term limits should be set for congress. Two terms is plenty. The problem now is that congressmen get elected, build alliances (between other politicians and lobbyists), and lose sight that they are supposed to represent their districts. This becomes a job for them instead of a purpose. They find out that by making certain alliances they gain power and money (almost every congressman becomes a millionaire or more after serving a few years).

Another thing we need to do is eliminate the way lobbyists and special interest groups operate. We need to make it illegal for any lobbyist or special interest group to "donate" money, trips, gifts, etc. to a politician. Pharmaceutical companies were notorious for buying off doctors by giving them gifts (disguised as a trip to some exotic place to attend a "seminar"). Congress put a stop to that and now doctors are no longer prescribing drugs based on which company gives him the best "benefits".
satexasguy is offline   Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 05:28 PM   #65
Samcro84
Ambassador
 
Samcro84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 27, 2011
Location: Happing Ending, Texas
Posts: 8,819
Encounters: 101
Default

Why are you even talking about this shit.

Hey he won! Nothing can change the outcome.

My choice lost, but I was over it when I woke
up Wednesday.

My future business decisions will be dramatically
Different. But, I will survive no matter who
who is president.

Of course I could be wrong!
Samcro84 is offline   Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 07:26 PM   #66
Laz
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 14, 2011
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 2,280
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAtexas View Post
What are you basing this on? I'm not saying it is working, but a general statement with no support isn't worth the time it takes to type it.
Look at the student rankings in the US to the rest of the world. I will not do the research for you. If you disagree prove me wrong.

As for who should be responsible. The states have that responsibility. They will have to manage their budgets accordingly. Passing the cost to the federal government is not the solution.

I think people need to overhaul how education is delivered in this country. There are many options that could improve it and actually reduce its cost. We always talk about great teachers that can communicate effectively. Why are we not finding the best of them and using technology to let them teach large quantities of students. Why are we not creating video presentations that the students learn from. Think about the beginning of saving private ryan and the d-day invasion. Is there anyone that saw that and did not get an emotional and thorough understanding of what those kids faced that day. Imagine creating lessons about history that were like that for kids to learn from. It would be expensive to develop but then it could be used millions of times for many years. From that perspective the cost would be trivial. More importantly the kids would actually learn and enjoy the process.

And finally, yes Obama won. While I am disappointed, I am not going to bitch about that. However, the issues still exist and I enjoy discussing the alternatives and debating them. The national forum just looks like elementary school name calling and has gotten VERY boring.
Laz is offline   Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 08:43 PM   #67
Guest083013
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Posts: 7,346
Encounters: 26
Default .....Obamacare is already beginning to be felt in many ways

and in addition to this - I have a very close friend who owns 16 McDonald's franchises who will be doing basically the same thing.....

http://www.kens5.com/news/San-Antoni...179737691.html

.....this is where the rubber hits the road folks!!

Guest083013 is offline   Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 10:07 PM   #68
Laz
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 14, 2011
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 2,280
Encounters: 10
Default

Obamacare is bad law for a lot of reasons. The two primary ones are that it is NOT healthcare, it is insurance and inefficient insurance at that. The second reason is that because it does not incentivize innovation nor encourage efficiency it will not lower the cost of health care.
Laz is offline   Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 11:08 PM   #69
oden
Valued Poster
 
oden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 4, 2010
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 830
Default

So what do you do when everyone runs out of money? We all will go back to don't tap me, I can't afford it. Pay for your own damned stuff. Don't come to Texas and take our money for California.

The key to our success has been that we have been a Constitutional Federation of States, not a National Democracy. The role of the Federal government is limited to national defense and regulation of interstate commerce. When you go beyond that you are forcing different states to subsidize things that they do not believe in for agendas that the offending states believe in but can not afford.

If the coastal states want to have an agenda that they can not afford we should not be forced to subsidize them. They say California is a bell weather state, well guess where the nation is headed!
oden is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved