Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

budman33 · 10-08-2012, 09:34 PM

I am sensing a disturbing trend.

When you argument goes flat.. insult people and not their ideas. It's getting quite old to listen to.

Just sayin.

JD Barleycorn · 10-09-2012, 04:28 AM

The price of gas in California on 10/08/12

That looks higher than $4 a gallon.

Not an anomaly. This is the price of gas in February of this year and I bet you didn't hear about it. http://www.ktla.com/news/landing/ktl...,7120467.story

LexusLover · 10-09-2012, 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJoe

Right now California is suffering from some problems with production of gasoline, not the availability of oil.

Calfornia suffers from California. Increased "enviornmental taxes" on fuel and increased production costs for fuel that meets California's regulations.

Hopefully "we" can end the utilization of Calfornia political philosophy next month.

FYI: Part of your electricity bill in Texas includes "your share" of the Reliant Energy losses from the California crash in which Reliant Energy was left holding the bag for unpaid utility bills when businesses and consumers fled the State. The Texas PUC allowed Reliant to include the California losses in its rate increase request that was granted years ago.

Does that philosophy sound familiar to anyone?

Let the rest of the country pay for our stupidity!

LexusLover · 10-09-2012, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJ7

a ban on drilling halted production?

a well being drilled doesnt produce anything ..

.. you are correct .. if it is a "dry hole" ... otherwise it produces.

Of course to increase production OF OIL one must beable to drill.

Now, do you understand the "connection" ...

.... or do you just argue to hear yourself?

Speaking of your Harvard Law Review staffer in the Oval Office ....

.... why did he kill the pipeline deal?

Did someone find a salamander in a creek somewhere along the route?

LexusLover · 10-09-2012, 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I suppose it would offend someone as smart as you to inform you that it is spelled "scholar". I'm assuming the Road Scholor [sic] is a play on words for Rhodes Scholar. No one could be that stupid. Well, not many.

Apparently the picture didn't remain ... some people need pictures.

In the future I will try harder to make sure that I explain spelling variations parenthetically to avoid any future misunderstandings on your part (or other scholars) so as not to confuse them or make them feel as though they must engage in a discourse with inferior minds. FYI: It has been my experience in life and work that people who focus on form (or spelling and grammar, particularly in texting, emails, and blogs) lack much to say in response to the substance, so they resort to form, spelling, and grammar in an attempt to marginalize or dismiss the author's ideas.

I trust you are not in that category of "intellects."

I thought I spelled "scholars' correctly in my post .. the "scholors' was a typo!

Carry on ... Professor Cute.

LexusLover · 10-09-2012, 05:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by budman33

I am sensing a disturbing trend.

When you argument goes flat.. insult people and not their ideas. It's getting quite old to listen to.

Just sayin.

+100 ... FYI: That's not a "trend" ... that's been a fact for years.

Some more than others.

E.g. apparently "gay" people are "idiots"! Just saying.

CuteOldGuy · 10-09-2012, 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Apparently the picture didn't remain ... some people need pictures.

In the future I will try harder to make sure that I explain spelling variations parenthetically to avoid any future misunderstandings on your part (or other scholars) so as not to confuse them or make them feel as though they must engage in a discourse with inferior minds. FYI: It has been my experience in life and work that people who focus on form (or spelling and grammar, particularly in texting, emails, and blogs) lack much to say in response to the substance, so they resort to form, spelling, and grammar in an attempt to marginalize or dismiss the author's ideas.

I trust you are not in that category of "intellects."

I thought I spelled "scholars' correctly in my post .. the "scholors' was a typo!

Carry on ... Professor Cute.

Pardon me, LL. I actually thought you were another poster, I didn't read correctly. You aren't the pompous ass this was directed toward. My mistake.

CJ7 · 10-09-2012, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

.. you are correct .. if it is a "dry hole" ... otherwise it produces.

Of course to increase production OF OIL one must beable to drill.

Now, do you understand the "connection" ...

.... or do you just argue to hear yourself?

Speaking of your Harvard Law Review staffer in the Oval Office ....

.... why did he kill the pipeline deal?

Did someone find a salamander in a creek somewhere along the route?

spoken totally out of context, as usual.

halting drilling for a period of time has NO effect on the amount of oil other wells are pulling out of the ground, NONE.

You have 1 well producing 2000 barrels a day ... youre drilling another well on the same lease thats about half way home ... for whatever reason you halt the drilling on the non producing well and that has a direct effect on the amount of oil being pumped out of the ground from the other well ?

youre an idiot aint cha?

WTF · 10-09-2012, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Pardon me, LL. I actually thought you were another poster, I didn't read correctly. You aren't the pompous ass this was directed toward. My mistake.

What a color blind SOB you are! It is not the content of the post but the poster who makes them. Over looks stupid post from folks that do not challenge his dribble! Hang in there old man, someone is on the way to cut your meat!

CJ7 · 10-09-2012, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I suppose it would offend someone as smart as you to inform you that it is spelled "scholar". I'm assuming the Road Scholor [sic] is a play on words for Rhodes Scholar. No one could be that stupid. Well, not many.

WTF · 10-09-2012, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

+100 ... FYI: That's not a "trend" ... that's been a fact for years.

Some more than others.

E.g. apparently "gay" people are "idiots"! Just saying.

No gay people are just gay. The idiots are the folks that try and deny them the same marriage benifits of straight people, for political gain.

CJ7 · 10-09-2012, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

.. you are correct .. if it is a "dry hole" ... otherwise it produces.

Of course to increase production OF OIL one must beable to drill.

Now, do you understand the "connection" ...

.... or do you just argue to hear yourself?

Speaking of your Harvard Law Review staffer in the Oval Office ....

.... why did he kill the pipeline deal?

Did someone find a salamander in a creek somewhere along the route?

annnnnnnnnddddd ...

the republican house killed Keystone when they included it in a tax bill that was set to be voted on, and would have PASSED without much resistance from either side ...

LexusLover · 10-09-2012, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJ7

annnnnnnnnddddd ...

the republican house killed Keystone when they included it in a tax bill that was set to be voted on, and would have PASSED without much resistance from either side ...

Of course. ... it was the Republicans fault. Not the EPA's who wanted an additional impact study to be completed before approving the project. Obaminable himself said there had to be additional studies to determine the environmental impact.

So, who killed again?

LexusLover · 10-09-2012, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

No gay people are just gay.

That gay person in the picture makes you appear to be a mental midget. Additionally, and more importantly, he appears and presents himself as a decent and caring person. Distguishing himself from the likes of you and your fan club. So ...

he is more than "just gay."

You are sad WTF. Real sad. And I not speaking of "sorrowful." Like disgusting.

LexusLover · 10-09-2012, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJ7

You have 1 well producing 2000 barrels a day ... youre drilling another well on the same lease thats about half way home ... for whatever reason you halt the drilling on the non producing well and that has a direct effect on the amount of oil being pumped out of the ground from the other well ?

Name one well in one field or location in which that has occurred by the current administration failing to issue permits to explore and drill known reserves.

Again, your assumption is that the "producing well" is drawing down on an existing reservoir and that the potential wells halted were being drilled and/or going to be drilled into the same reservoir.

Or do you believe there is only ONE reservoir beneath the Gulf. Now ..

Do you know what other countries are drilling in the Gulf?

"Countries with offshore oil resources do not intend to follow the lead of the United States in imposing a moratorium on offshore drilling nor are they slowing progress towards exploration and development of offshore oil resources in the Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere."
http://www.instituteforenergyresearc...ail-to-follow/

Don't worry CJ7, ignorance is curable, so that part you can heal. It's the dumbass that is going to be challenging, because stupidity is usually hereditary.

If there is a pile of shit that you and WTF are fighting over and he stops fighting for it, then that leaves the whole pile of shit for you to take. So when he decides he wants some more shit, there will not be any more (or there will be lessl) shit for him to take. Get it?