Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
649 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
398 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
Starscream66 |
282 |
You&Me |
281 |
George Spelvin |
270 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70819 | biomed1 | 63644 | Yssup Rider | 61234 | gman44 | 53344 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48794 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 43216 | The_Waco_Kid | 37398 | CryptKicker | 37228 | Mokoa | 36497 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
09-25-2019, 07:13 AM
|
#1
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
|
The Dims Impeachment Scam
So I'm reading this person
...Didn't witness the phone call
...Hasn't read the phone call's transcript
...Used to work for Schumer and Hillary
...Didn't qualify for "whistleblower protection" by the DNI Inspector General.
Sounds like a Dim plant.
Wouldn't be surprised if its a woman with a grudge a la Kavanaugh.
Strange that there was a lot of "breast beating" by Pelosi and some of the Democratic women but little by the Dim men except the usual suspects. Also suspect that nobody had a specific charge but a lot of "protect the constitution" bluster.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
09-25-2019, 08:21 AM
|
#2
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 43,216
|
Fucking idiots.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-25-2019, 08:35 AM
|
#3
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Oct 1, 2013
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 12,555
|
I have said before many times the Dim wits will keep the obstruction of the country going till the elections.
Just another scam to keep the Media Hysteria going , and hoping the LSM will overlook all the illegal shit "hunter " did.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-25-2019, 09:56 AM
|
#4
|
BANNED
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
|
I read other shit, like the Whistleblower is a Republican plant who set up the Democrats to demand an accounting of the phone call, which will exonerate Trump and force Biden from the race.
why don't we wait for facts before judging?
by the way, the fact that so many leaks sift from the White House is not the "deep state" at work, in my opinion. it is Republicans who want Trump out, but realize they are a minority, and leaking is the only way they have to fight. how would the Whistleblower be a Hillary Democrat? he/she would have had to get the information from an on-scene Republican who hates Trump, it seems to me
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-25-2019, 10:05 AM
|
#5
|
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
I read other shit, like the Whistleblower is a Republican plant who set up the Democrats to demand an accounting of the phone call, which will exonerate Trump and force Biden from the race.
why don't we wait for facts before judging?
by the way, the fact that so many leaks sift from the White House is not the "deep state" at work, in my opinion. it is Republicans who want Trump out, but realize they are a minority, and leaking is the only way they have to fight. how would the Whistleblower be a Hillary Democrat? he/she would have had to get the information from an on-scene Republican who hates Trump, it seems to me
|
Waiting for Facts before judging, that's a good idea. Unfortunately Politicians don't know how to do that.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-25-2019, 10:12 AM
|
#6
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
I read other shit, like the Whistleblower is a Republican plant who set up the Democrats to demand an accounting of the phone call, which will exonerate Trump and force Biden from the race.
why don't we wait for facts before judging?
by the way, the fact that so many leaks sift from the White House is not the "deep state" at work, in my opinion. it is Republicans who want Trump out, but realize they are a minority, and leaking is the only way they have to fight. how would the Whistleblower be a Hillary Democrat? he/she would have had to get the information from an on-scene Republican who hates Trump, it seems to me
|
The IG determined that this so-called hearsay "whistleblower" is an anti-Trumper that was firmly in the camp of a rival 2016 candidate. Furthermore, this so-called hearsay "whistleblower" is represented by a lawyer with close connections to hildebeest and Chucky Schumer. Your notion that this so-called hearsay "whistleblower" might be a Republican is balderdash.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-25-2019, 10:22 AM
|
#7
|
BANNED
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Your notion that this so-called hearsay "whistleblower" might be a Republican is balderdash. [/COLOR][/SIZE]
|
I didn't say the Whistleblower is a Republican.. some guys here did, and I have read articles that believe that. I don't know, I wait for facts before spewing shit.. you don't. I can repeat leaks as well as you can, disguised as truths, but that doesn't make them accurate.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-25-2019, 10:22 AM
|
#8
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 43,216
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
The IG determined that this so-called hearsay "whistleblower" is an anti-Trumper that was firmly in the camp of a rival 2016 candidate. Furthermore, this so-called hearsay "whistleblower" is represented by a lawyer with close connections to hildebeest and Chucky Schumer. Your notion that this so-called hearsay "whistleblower" might be a Republican is balderdash.
|
The world now knows more than the whistle blower ever did. A complete nothing burger!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-25-2019, 10:29 AM
|
#9
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
The IG determined that this so-called hearsay "whistleblower" is an anti-Trumper that was firmly in the camp of a rival 2016 candidate. Furthermore, this so-called hearsay "whistleblower" is represented by a lawyer with close connections to hildebeest and Chucky Schumer. Your notion that this so-called hearsay "whistleblower" might be a Republican is balderdash.
|
exactly
and, unlike dims like all the presidential wannabes and john lewis, trying to sound statesman like "with a heavy heart", ......
who try to outrush each other on the race track to impeachment with no knowledge whatsoever.....
the dims who began impeachment talk the day after trump won the election....
why don't we get all the facts?
I could be wrong, but the dim's day of reckoning is coming
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-25-2019, 10:34 AM
|
#10
|
BANNED
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
why don't we get all the facts?
|
that is my question.. you have already figured out the facts of the Whistleblower, via leaks. it doesn't appear you are willing to wait for real facts.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-25-2019, 10:36 AM
|
#11
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
that is my question.. you have already figured out the facts of the Whistleblower, via leaks. it doesn't appear you are willing to wait for real facts.
|
if you made sense I could respond
where do you get this bull?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-25-2019, 10:36 AM
|
#12
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
that is my question.. you have already figured out the facts of the Whistleblower, via leaks. it doesn't appear you are willing to wait for real facts.
|
The transcript is out. The so-called hearsay "whistleblower" never had first hand knowledge of the phone call. The president doesn't fall under the scope of the law cited as a violation by the so-called hearsay "whistleblower". The IG determined that this so-called hearsay "whistleblower" is an anti-Trumper that was firmly in the camp of a rival 2016 candidate. Furthermore, this so-called hearsay "whistleblower" is represented by a lawyer with close connections to hildebeest and Chucky Schumer. Those are the facts.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-25-2019, 10:38 AM
|
#13
|
BANNED
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
[SIZE="4"][COLOR="Black"]The transcript is out.
|
transcript or memorandum? I hear the transcript is NOT out yet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
if you made sense I could respond
where do you get this bull?
|
from your post.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
09-25-2019, 10:40 AM
|
#14
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
transcript or memorandum? I hear the transcript is NOT out yet.
from your post.
|
you didn't read it then
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
09-25-2019, 10:40 AM
|
#15
|
Account Disabled
|
Americans can now see- in plain sight - just how desperate the Dems are. I am going to predict a landslide for Trump. Here and now, no doubt about it in my mind. Like zero doubts.
Now to enjoy the show called " Make Democrats Cry Again".
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|