Honesty in reviews

[disilene]

I am not trying to call anyone out. Just putting this out there.


It would help if the reviews were honest at least as far as physical descriptions. (As far as how many orgasms you made some girl have to endure...12-15...etc, I believe you, lol) But I digress.

Especially when a provider doesn't have recent pics and the reviews seem to be describing the (at least year old and 20 pound+ difference) old pics. There is no help in being what we might consider kind or slightly generous in our descriptions. Cause no matter the description, that isn't what is behind the door when you meet that person.

I can see how a generous description might help that lady get a few more customers, until someone corrects the perception of the physical description. But what is more likely to happen is guys with a fantasy in mind, that is expecting something, who gets to the door fully expecting to see A and sees B....see it as a bait and switch. Yes, it might be her in the face, and those pics were of her at one time....and yes she might still have the same great moves that light your rocket.

But, it is also likely to cause disappointment. When you reserve the sports car on the rental car website and arrive to find the soccer mom van waiting for you at the office....not a happy customer. Gets you from point A to point B...but are you likely to repeat? Did they gain a customer or did they loose a repeat customer?

When the description says Tight young spinner....and it is the person you meet (who is still awesome) but is not tight young spinner anymore....Can you see how that could be a problem? Nothing wrong with her, she is great, just not what you were expecting which makes you feel like:
1) you got played
2) you feel like you have to go through with the appointment even though you aren't in the mood (see point 1)
3) You are in a shitty mood because of point 1, she picks up on the vibes and it just keeps going downhill.

True, you may click even though and have a great time, I get it.


But am I the only one that thinks honesty is a good policy? Cause to harken back to my analogy, nothing wrong with the van, it has great attributes, but when you are in the mood for the sports car....it is hard to see those positives and easy to only focus on the negatives.

Plus there are all kinda guys who like all kinda body types. She may well be missing out on her target audience. An honest description might allow the guys who are looking for a body type like hers....to find her.


I am just saying, rant over about my encounter the other day.

[rex111999]

+1

[heidilynnla]

It's all smoke and mirrors here lately, Dislene. Ps: do a review

[muny4huny]

If reviews were descriptively honest, half this board would be out of business. A review of a 40 something saying "perky natural tits" I mean get real. and my personal favorite, "a 45yr old tight vagina on a 20yr escort" I think some people have forgotten what tight is or they have a 13 inch coke can cock.
I say if you can't be honest then you are ashamed.

[Arverni]

I won't do a bad review unless the girl makes me angry or something dangerous happens during the session.

If we just didn't "click" - then I won't do a review at all.

If you're buying a sports car - well that is an inanimate object and it has no comparison to an actual human being with feelings - like a provider. So they are different things and I'm not going to post in a review anything about her physical flaws. Providers are human beings and, being female, they're particularly hurt by negative comments about their bodies.

Every girl I have reviewed ... I would go back and see again and I have. If I thought she was crap - I just didn't review her - which is my option. If I enjoyed my time with the girl - I'm not going to make cheap-ass comments about "belly fat" or "cellulite" or "stretchmarks". It's not classy ... imo.

For me, it's the flaws that make a woman sexy anyway. A little bit of cellulite ... boobs that might slightly sag ... a few extra pounds ... remind me that I'm with a REAL woman and I'm not beating off to a Playboy magazine.

You have to remember Dis - that we "hobbyists" are not all alike. Yeah there are guys who flit from one provider to another, always seeking the ideal beauty (and at the lowest price ... LOL!) and they want comprehensive and accurate information on her body. But then there are guys like me who like special encounters with real women - some of whom may not be perfect. I can read the reviews, and in their totality - I have had no problems getting the information I need out of these reviews. If I still have questions - then I'll PM the reviewer for more info ... like I did with you recently - which I never got a response back on.

I once dated a bikini model in Hawaii who did stints on "Magnum P.I." and "Murder ... She Wrote" and she was, by far, the hottest girl I ever dated (for "free") ... but man ... she was a plank of plywood in the sack. Then I met this girl that was completely average - with a few extra pounds - and she burnt me to the ground every weekend we were together.

Nobody's perfect ... I'm certainly not. I look DAMN GOOD - but I have physical flaws and sometimes I shoot too quick or can't go a second round. The girls don't critique me on my flaws.

When a guy takes advantage of a girl - she doesn't get to critique that. If a guy comes in for a special ... then rides continuously for an hour ... and leaves late and doesn't tip - it's not serious enough to really post anything in the Powder Room for but it's certainly enough to make that girl not want to see that guy again (and prolly a few others - if they knew about it).

But it really comes down to what kind of hobbyist you are ... and guys like me are more interested in a mature, refined, woman who knows how to make me feel like I'm her man. I can deal with the flaws - hell, if the experience is enough I don't even notice them - or, like I said - they turn me on.

... a 45yr old tight vagina on a 20yr escort" I think some people have forgotten what tight is or they have a 13 inch coke can cock.

Well, you haven't "hobbied" enough then. There are plenty of girls in their LATE 40's who are tight and I have experienced some that were tighter than 20 year olds. It's natural childbirth that really gets the girl here ... NOT age. A 20 year old Mom who delivered naturally will often not be as "tight" as a 40 year old Mom who delivered via C-section. This idea that a man's dick can destroy a woman's "pliability" is pure male fantasy. It ain't the penis going in - it's the baby coming out that impacts this.

The one thing you can take to the bank here - if I review a girl then it means she is SPECIAL and I had a GODDAMN Good Time with her. If I repeat a review - it means I found the girl to be supersonically out of this world. She may have physical flaws ... so you guys who place absolute importance in that may not want to look at my reviews. But if you're like me, and you're looking for someone to blow you away ... then the girls I've reviewed will damn sure do it for you!

[pornodave69]

You also have to consider that a lot of guys here can't guess height, weight or measurements correctly in the first place, so they may not be dishonest, just bad at guessing and describing the girl.

I've seen guys call a tall, skinny girl a spinner. Just being thin doesn't make her a spinner. If she's taller than me she's no spinner.

Everybody has their own opinion as to what they like and what looks good to them and they'll describe them as they see them, not how you see them.

[trekker]

Originally Posted by Arverni

...There are plenty of girls in their LATE 40's who are tight and I have experienced some that were tighter than 20 year olds. It's natural childbirth that really gets the girl here ... NOT age. A 20 year old Mom who delivered naturally will often not be as "tight" as a 40 year old Mom who delivered via C-section. This idea that a man's dick can destroy a woman's "pliability" is pure male fantasy. It ain't the penis going in - it's the baby coming out that impacts this...

True

[DallasRain]

this "old gal" does still have a tight kitty at 50.....and a nice firm ass! lol
{I had a c section so that helped}

[disilene]

I wasn't meaning honesty in reviews implying that people were going out of their way to be dishonest.
Yes, I also suffer from not being able to guess height, weight, boob size.

I meant honesty in the sense that the review be as close as possible to the real, honest, actual description...not sure if I am expressing it right.

But tight young spinner isn't flabby, with no muscle tone. Not saying she wasn't cute, sexy...all that. Not trying to hurt anyone's feelings....just wasn't what I was expecting which.....sucks. When you buy something you want to get what you see advertised.

I saw some pics of the lady, they were corroborated by a review...showed up and....once upon a time....that was her.


No, I didn't write a review because I didn't go through with the appointment. I was looking for something very specific that day and so I politely declined and visited someone else.

I see all kinds. I have spanned the spectrum from spinner to BBw. 18 years old to 40+. I like all kinds, so it wasn't because she wasn't sexy, just well.....I had a fantasy in my minds eye that day.

[muny4huny]

Originally Posted by Arverni
...There are plenty of girls in their LATE 40's who are tight and I have experienced some that were tighter than 20 year olds. It's natural childbirth that really gets the girl here ... NOT age. A 20 year old Mom who delivered naturally will often not be as "tight" as a 40 year old Mom who delivered via C-section. This idea that a man's dick can destroy a woman's "pliability" is pure male fantasy. It ain't the penis going in - it's the baby coming out that impacts this...

You are comparing a 20yr old with kid vagina to a 40yr old without, that alone admits to what I had said. How about a 21yr old without kids and who is brand new to the business compared to a 40yr old who has been in the business for 17yrs? minus the rare exception that the 21yr old is into double fisting since 11th grade, I would say the younger the tighter. Now perhaps people should say, "she is tight for a veteran provider" and the rest of us will get it.

[bigclitluvr]

Arverni agree!

[Guest103014]

I think most of the "exagerated" reviews are by newbs like me.

We still feel "lucky" to be w/ that lady - even though its all about the benjamins to her.

So, we are all glowy and "what a good time" and we see things a certain way.

Its just part of the screwed up way men are wired.

I don't think its an ill intent. Just a man's natural tendency to romanticize the event - of course, the hotter he is, the more she came the bigger stud he is, so it gets puffed.

But I think its sincere. Mostly

[Guest051920]

disilene makes a good point some reviews are off.Most guys are not great with weight,bra size estimates. When guys are off by 40lbs or 8 sizes that is something that is noticeable.Most providers don't age but yet guys still post ages that are a decade off.Ladies should be more honest with there pictures also.There is no need to use old pictures,Photoshop or someone else photos.Some ladies and gents will argue guys are not perfect but that is besides the point.Guys are spending their money if she does not want to see overweight guys with a belly and bald she should say so.

[Guest090514]

I think there needs to be a 48 hour "cool down period" before you write a review. I would write two totally different reviews 48 hours apart. I would be more objective after the cool down.

[australian_hell_yun]

@ Dallas. Those 10# babies sure can mess up a play ground.