Ketanji Brown Jackson

[texassapper]

She raped me at a high school party. I remember it clearly.... it all came back to me when I was in therapy.

I assume since she raped me that's why she wants light sentences for kiddie diddlers.

You'd think with the prevalence of sexual assault in the black community a sister would be against light sentences for that shit...but hey, guess she's gotta protect her own.

[WTF]

I vote her guilty as she obviously fucked you senseless

[HedonistForever]

Why shouldn't Republicans ask Brown, the same kind of question, with the same accusatory tone, that Democrats asked Kavanaugh and Barrett?

Repub. Sen.,"Judge Brown have you ever sexually assaulted anybody"? Did you ever play a drinking game in college? Did you ever have to much to drink to the point that you passed out? Do you think America is systemically Racist? And if your answer is yes, how the hell did you get here?

Do you believe in the kind of bail reform we see taking place right now? Do you think an 6 year old should be questioned and lectured on their sexuality?

I would prepare a list of every questioned asked of Kavanugh and Barrett and ask Judge Brown the same damn question an oh, the howls we will hear.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by WTF

I vote her guilty as she obviously fucked you senseless

... Really? ... How could YOU tell?

### Salty

[texassapper]

Yeah, KBJ likes her some kiddie diddlers.

WHY IS IT THE DEMOCRATS ARE GROOMERS?


1. Defendant distributed multiple images of child porn, possessed dozens more, including videos:
Federal sentencing guidelines: 97-121 months in prison.
Prosecutors recommended 24 months in prison.
Judge Jackson gave the defendant three months in prison.

2. Defendant possessed 48 files of child pornography:
Federal guidelines: 78-97 months in prison.
Prosecutor recommended the same (78-97 months).
Judge Jackson sentenced him to 28 months.

3. Defendant distributed dozens of images of child pornography, possessed over six hundred:
Federal guidelines: 151-188 months in prison.
Prosecutor recommended 72 months.
Judge Jackson gave the defendant the lowest sentence permitted by law (60 months).

4. Defendant distributed 33 graphic images and videos of child sexual assault on anonymous messaging app:
Federal guidelines: 70-87 months in prison.
Prosecutor recommended 70 months in prison.
Judge Jackson sentenced to the lowest sentence permitted by law (60 months).

5. Defendant distributed scores of images and children suffering sexual abuse:
Federal guidelines: 97-121 months in prison.
Prosecutor recommended 97 months in prison.
Judge Jackson gave him 57 months

6. Defendant distributed over a hundred videos of child pornography:
Guidelines: 97-121 months in prison.
Prosecution recommended 97 months.
Judge Jackson gave 71 months.

7. Defendant was convicted of traveling across state lines to engage in sexual intercourse with a child and also possessed six separate thumb drives of child pornography:
Guidelines: 46-57 months in prison.
Prosecutor recommended 49 months.
Judge Jackson sentenced to 37 months.

[Jackie S]

I say let her breeze through the hearings. Unless she is hiding some deep conservative thoughts, we know what we are getting. A Black Liberal who will vote the Progressive Agenda.

The last thing the Republicans need to do is indulge in the childish behavior exhibited by the Democrats in the latest two hearings.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... Really? ... How could YOU tell?

### Salty

Looks like someone did the same to you...

[bambino]

Originally Posted by WTF

Looks like someone did the same to you...

You would know Professor Poofter.

[HedonistForever]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

I say let her breeze through the hearings. Unless she is hiding some deep conservative thoughts, we know what we are getting. A Black Liberal who will vote the Progressive Agenda.

The last thing the Republicans need to do is indulge in the childish behavior exhibited by the Democrats in the latest two hearings.

I know you speak the truth and that is what both sides "should do" but it's too damn late for that in my opinion as much as I respect yours.. This is war as far as I'm concerned and as long as the American citizens know why the Republicans would do this to highlight just how bad it was that Democrats did, I can't see us moving forward. It's like letting the bully off the hook and I'm not ready to do that. We should teach by showing is the first thing you do, when they bring out the knives, we should bring out the guns as long as we are speaking the truth.



"Judge Brown, here in my hands are the questions the Democrats saw fit to ask the last woman, or can I call you a women, that sat in that chair and I only thought it fair to ask you these same questions since they seem to be the most important things on Democrats minds", would that be OK with you Judge? Judge, "do you have any "dogma" in you that we should know about? Because that seemed to be a big concern by a prominent Democrat. Any unusual practices in your religious beliefs? OBJECTION, you can ask a question about the nominee's religion!!! OK, then I'll just use the statement by our esteemed colleague Sen. Fienstein "I think the "dogma lives loudly in you". What do you think of that statement Judge Brown?


Then I would vote to put her on the court. That's were I would make my statement that Judge Brown appears to be as legally qualified as anybody that has come before us, I just vehemently disagree with literally everything she believes in, but our President has the right to nominee and have confirmed, after a fair confirmation process, any qualified person they put forth. I hope from this day forth, both sides will adopt that philosophy and we can get back to civil discourse but Democrats can not just walk away from what they did. Fuck that!

[Chung Tran]

At least ''y'all'' are giving her a chance to field questions, unlike Merrick Garland.

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

At least ''y'all'' are giving her a chance to field questions, unlike Merrick Garland.

And thank what ever deity you might look too.

Considering Garlands behavior since, even you should be thankful that piece of shit never got on the Court.

[dilbert firestorm]

she supports CRT.

[matchingmole]

Originally Posted by texassapper

She raped me at a high school party. I remember it clearly.... it all came back to me when I was in therapy.

I assume since she raped me that's why she wants light sentences for kiddie diddlers.

You'd think with the prevalence of sexual assault in the black community a sister would be against light sentences for that shit...but hey, guess she's gotta protect her own.

Well...She must have fucked your brains out. Another brainless Trumptard....

[matchingmole]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

she supports CRT.

Good deal

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by matchingmole

Well...She must have fucked your brains out. Another brainless Trumptard....

if you say so

Originally Posted by matchingmole

Good deal

the mole supports CRT





BAAHHHAAAAAAAA