Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
We don't give a shit.
|
Of course you don't. That just mean you're too ignorant to understand that the only thing holding this wonderful little society you have there together is the rule of law. If we publicly go down the road of not investigating and prosecuting political crimes then we will cease to have rule of law. It's one thing to have your average criminal not obey laws. They're mostly stupid and that's why they mostly get caught.
Imagine if you decided you were no longer bound by our social contract and laws... now imagine everyone you know unbound by following the law. How long do you think you're going to get to enjoy this comfy civilization here when nobody thinks the laws matter.
This shit will go downhill faster than any of you comprehend. I was in Lebanon in the early 90s after the civil war. trust me you don't want that hell to come here.
In reality it probably won't get like that for 5-10 years. Before that happens, you'll just get to enjoy liberal tyranny where the laws mean what they want them to mean at any given time. You may get charged an someone else may not. If you think the current system is unfair...wait til you get the Maoists in charge. Enjoy cancel culture with the cancelers having Govt. stamp of approval.
Ain't Mobs great?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
More desperation drop kicks from these fools.
|
No. This should have been done three years and eleven months ago... but no. Hillarys plan worked. She planted the whole Russia collusion thing and we've spent MILLIONS investigating - and you you were fooled too weren't you? I mean doesn't that bother you that the democrats and the press (OITS) lied to you and you bought it? Do you feel as foolish as you look?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
They keep hammering about Democrats wanting to ''stack the Court'', how they won't answer whether they will.
|
Uh Republicans have never talked about court stacking. Only Democrats have threatened it. That's because the liberals are the party of toddlers. Don't get your way? Stack the court. Republicans understand that if that happens, its again the end of this Republican experiment. I know, you're too ignorant to comprehend why... but it's because its the one limit our Founders didn't think of. But they never conceived the Court would have judicial review.
By the way so you understand since you are using the term wrong that court stacking/packing mean expanding the size of the court. It has NOTHING to do with putting judges in vacant seats. That's called doing your job. Some other oval office occupant said it best "elections have consequences."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
Besides that it is too soon to decide something like that, the Public fucking yawns.
|
No. The press tells you the public yawns. maybe you don't care, but others do. But I guess since you don't care it doesn't matter, right? We've seated judges with less time than hers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
That is inside baseball shit.
|
No. This is civics 101. You should have had to take it to graduate high school. If you don't understand the significance, blame a liberal and the teachers unions who want an ignorant electorate so they can pull stunts like this... call it "court packing" and you're too ignorant to understand that you're being lied to again. Are you starting to see a pattern, Chung?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
Trump brags about appointing 300 judges.. So what.
|
I'm beginning to think you don't understand how government works. But again, you can thank the teachers union for your ignorance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
The Senate wouldn't confirm Obama's picks.
|
Say it with me... Elections have CONSEQUENCES. Democrats are odd folks. The ONLY time they want you to pay attention to the govt. is when they want you to vote fore them. The rest of the time they don't want you to understand or even notice it. Right now, the govt. is prosecuting an innocent civilian, like yourself, for a crime that the govt. has now admitted was a frame up. The govt. and prosecutors have dropped the charges. Yet the man remains on trial.. why? Because of a political hack judge. Yes I'm talking about Gen. Flynn. And if it can happen to him it can happen to all of us. The Senate wouldn't confirm Obamas judges because that's the caliber of judge Obama nominated. Political hacks that don't understand the law and they blew away the filibuster to get those judges on the DC circuit. Probably specifically to delay any future investigations into their criminal conduct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
Who cares how many Judges you put in?
|
Don't worry your little head about it, Tran. Just understand that what Obama and the leftists democrats who are his followers want is no less than full power of the govt and in turn you. you understand what happens in revolutions...lots and lots of people die. And the whole point of this revolution isn't to free anyone or throw off the being sent to the coal mines... this is so they can control you better. that's the whole simple goal. Control over your life.... every aspect. Name one thing. ANYTHING...and I will PROVE to you that the Conservative stance is the classically liberal one, the one that advocates personal freedom and liberty.
Mike Pompeo tells Fox News he will publicly release Hillary Clinton’s 'emails' before the election
