Have you ever tsken a shower with a prostitute?

[tatasddd]

Recently I watched a video where after the whore arrived the client showered with her and had her wash his whole body and his dick and asscrack then they fucked. I thought it's fucking hot and I will try it soon. Have you had similar experience? Now that's what I really call full service.

[lopromfpgh]

Why are you so incessantly curious about what other MALE hobbyists like?!
“How do you like your dick sucked?” Unless you’re gonna suck it, WTF do you care??

Reminds me so much of the movie where the closet case guy went to get a lapdance from a girl who was the GF of closet case guy’s TRUE love interest. She had her ass all up in dude’s face and he’s like ,”Tell me what type of man you like”. She tells him, finiahes dancing and says,” Now...How about you tell me what type of Man YOU like!?!”

So... CHOMO....ha ha ha

[bigguyt]

He is a closet fag, he has posted asking if guys masterbate to his reviews, and he does gay porn online. I think he is angry at women because he is not attracted to them.

[HoustonRiley]

Gents & Providers shower all the time.
In the summer i even provide a shower session with a standing K9 finish.
Try it...

[lopromfpgh]

http://denver.cbslocal.com/2017/05/1...rivacy-escort/

[lopromfpgh]

It seems that one can be held liable in civil proceedings for invasion of privacy... One may not initially believe so, given the speculation that perhaps escorts, or adult entertainers in general may be involved in unscrupulous, unsavory, shameful, or perhaps illegal activities; However, that’s not how the courts see invasion pf privacy. To the courts, all that has to be proven is that there was malicious intent and willful abuse of information to cause injury to the victim.

Looking at the initial complaint...”(so & so)said i worked at burger king...waa waa waa..” isn’t maliciously invading one’s privacy. Had someone publicly stated a full name, physical deacription with IDENTIFYING characteristics, exact location of said douchebags place of employment... then, in the eyes of the law, the op would have claim to a civil suit. It should be noted that it doesn’t legally give one permission to out another directly, but whether he looks at it as legal or “what’s fair is fair”/street justice it isn’t in any case.
Most likely, this was done because the author himself was embarrassed about being employed at a “McJob”, and decided to wield whayever perceived power he thinks he has by attempting to destroy several women’s lives, the lives of their families and/or spouses, and perhaps leave them open to the propensity of having a multitude of violent crimes committed against them.

So , my best advise to any of the ladies and gentlemen whom may be affected by this, is
1. SCREEN SHOT THIS SHIT- RIGHT NOW-OVER FIVE HOURS AFTER THE INFORMATION POSTED.
2. KEEP BACK UP COPIES OF THIS POST AND ANY OTHER THAT ATTEST TO THE ACTORS TROUBLESOME & PROBLEMATIC NATURE, INCLUDING REPEATED BANS/INFARCTIONS FOR THIS VERY OFFENSE
3. DO NOT RETALIATE, EITHER ON OR OFF ANY OF THE BOARDS
4. GET LEGAL REPRESENTATION ASAP.
5. IF YOU HAVE A SUBSTANCE ABUSE ISSUE, SEEK HELP IMMEDIATELY

I personally also find it odd that one can’t sell a two dollar item on ebay without ebay weeding out certain information (same with Cl I believe) in messages and posts, like email addresses, yet here’s fuckin eccie, brokering in information of a highly private nature/subject matter, and this has went on with this particular member for YEARS and for years he has been a danger to the community, but they have done absolutely NOTHING to stop it.

I KNOW THE OPs REAL NAME AND ADDRESS, AND I WILL NOT POST IT. I will, however disclose it to any officer of the court for the purpose of legal proceedings.

[bigguyt]

What are you going to get off him if you sue, a bus pass, a Burger King employee id and tons of gay pornography.

[ck1942]

Thanks for the Denver link.

At first appearance, imo, the defendant should have won on merit, since what he was posting was true. Privacy or not aside.

But the local (state based) jury disagreed and so did the judge.

But the defendant's first big mistake imo was he was his own attorney and did not hire an experienced 1st amendment professional.

And, First Amendment protection should have covered. Again, imo.

Quite likely the case will be appealed into the Federal courts where the 1st A arguments might resolve.

Again, thanks for the interesting read this morning.