This trend of DNA collecting is getting out of hand. Various courts are undecided about whether, pre-conviction, it constitutes a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
http://www.alternet.org/sex/153918/d..._johns/?page=1
"Defining men who buy sex as a special class is one way Demand Abolition attempts to make the case for enhanced policing. Yet there's a tension at the core of
Demand Abolition's study and how researchers conceive of men's involvement in the sex trade. On the one hand, the study claims to destroy “the common myth that any man might buy sex (i.e., that a sex buyer is a random everyman, an anonymous male who deserves the common name, john).” At the same time, this is how the research team defined a “non-sex buyer”:
We defined non-sex buyers as men who have not purchased phone sex or the services of a sex worker, escort, massage sex worker, or prostitute, have not been to a strip club more than one time in the past year, have not purchased a lap dance, and have not used pornography more than one time in the past week."
Um, that pretty much classifies EVERY man over the age of 13 with access to a computer as a "sex buyer"
DNA Database of Men Who Pay for Sex? (article)
