Girls that use Glamour shots or Photo Shop should be banned

[Texanfan]

I just had a session with a lady who has a good reputation and did her part for the session but i was extremely dissapointed when i saw her. Especially her friend that she shared the room with . These two girls took photo shop to the extreme and looked nothing like the Glamour shots posted on their web sites. They were 6's maybe pushing a 7 in person but definitely not the 10's on their web sited or pictures here on eccie. I started to turn and walk but she was nice enough to accomadate me for being rudely late. and she wasnt ugly, just not what i expected. The session isnt worthy of a review, just an ordinary wham bam thank you mam. I am speaking of Jessie James and her friend Jasmine love. My session was with Jasmine. I met Jessie as she got off the elevator while i was going to get on the elvator to go up to the room. I thought to myself, not knowing it was her, Damn , she looks like a HO , wonder if she dates. When the session was over , Jasmine went down the elevator to meet Jessie in the lobby and thats was when i thoght, Damn, she was the Ho i saw getting out of the elevator. Nothing like her pictures.

[notanewbie]

Jessie Jane?

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=473224

[cumalot]

A link to what photo's your talking about would really help us all see what your refering too...as I am sure there are a lot of jessie's and Jasmine's, that would help narrow things down a bit......ijs....and as far as banning someone over photos, that aint ever gonna happen......

[Texanfan]

yes jessie Jane

[cumalot]

Ok Texanfan that's a start we need names and Links by you and preferably links to their pics that have lots of nipple shots, as that's the key to desision making....ijs

[dearhunter]

I would rather not see Texanfan's nipples.......ijs

[looking2havefun]

I can't comment on her friend since i've not met her, but i did see Jessie and to me she looks just as good as her pic's

[Texanfan]

Jessie is no where even close to the picture. the picture dont show the tatoos so that is photo shopped

[Eccie Addict]

Tattoos are usually ps for privacy reasons.

[texasaggie96]

Originally Posted by Texanfan

Jessie is no where even close to the picture. the picture dont show the tatoos so that is photo shopped

ECCIE Addict the Mod said it right - I have done that for providers as well - strip out tats and give-away piercings on the face (i.e., non-traditional piercings) is a common practice. Though to be fair, someone hiding ink or other should at least put it out there somewhere that they have tats.

That being all said, we should all assume given the rise in digital photo enhancement (whether actual Photoshop or even Android & iPhone based Apps) that some touch-up may occur. If you are getting upset that a professional shot (i.e., in-studio, or done on location with lighting, etc.) is not 100% accurate then perhaps you may be forgetting the purpose of those stills is marketing.

I never assume a professional shot is what I will receive, we're all only human, after all. Hence the rise in provider requests for photos to be taken that do a great job but are more "real" in feel and less "TGTBT" in feel - that delicate balance between studio quality and "in real life" shot.

[Guest081014]

First of all, the only thing photoshopped in my photos is the tattoo, aside from that, no editing what so ever. Second, you didn't even meet me. You saw me walking in lobby after I just got out of the pool. Third, everyone that actually has met me, says that I look much better then my photos. I'm not sure what your problem is, but its rude to assume things you don't know about someone you've never even met.

[hornfreak]

I would prefer just regular pictures. Like the ones T-bonetas used to take. That way Im pretty sure I know what I'm walking into. Instead of expecting a total beauty on the other side of the door, having me not liking her and me walking away. Not saying that all providers do this. Oh well......

[texasaggie96]

Well, I suppose it's just me, I just assume every professional shot has some touch-up of some kind. What bothers me more than a minor tat cover is a 2007 photo on a 2012 ad.

[carkido45]

Only one way to settle this .
Jessie Jane let me take some photos and set the record straight .

My work is not Photoshop what you see is what you get

[oilfieldscum]

So where's a link to this Jasmine the OP had a session with?

carkido you're working those session discounts kind of hard aren't you?