Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

JD Barleycorn · 06-16-2015, 11:37 AM

...because they found Hillary and the State Department (that's Obama) were not forthcoming with all the requested emails. Some of you idiots want to know why this keeps going and going because we don't have all the information yet. Not that hard to understand for reasonable people but for Obamatons...?

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/0...7.html?hp=t3_r

timpage · 06-16-2015, 11:56 AM

Do you even know any "reasonable people"?

Yssup Rider · 06-16-2015, 12:04 PM

This keeps going on because nimrods like you keep it going on.

Yawwwwwnnnnn!

CuteOldGuy · 06-17-2015, 12:10 AM

This keeps going on because the administration keeps lying about it.

WombRaider · 06-17-2015, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

This keeps going on because the administration keeps lying about it.

What about the administration that got away with lying about Iraq? They get a pass?

CuteOldGuy · 06-17-2015, 12:55 AM

So it's ok for Obama to lie because Bush did? Do you know how stupid that argument is? And it doesn't work on me. I've advocated for Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Obama, Hillary and others to put on trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and other illegal skirmishes. I wouldn't give Bush a pass. Not then. Not ever.

WombRaider · 06-17-2015, 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

So it's ok for Obama to lie because Bush did? Do you know how stupid that argument is? And it doesn't work on me. I've advocated for Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Obama, Hillary and others to put on trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and other illegal skirmishes. I wouldn't give Bush a pass. Not then. Not ever.

I didn't say it was ok. Those were your words. I'm merely pointing out they're all to be blamed. I'm glad we can agree on Bush and war crimes.

LexusLover · 06-17-2015, 04:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timpage

Do you even know any "reasonable people"?

Most of the people I KNOW are "reasonable people."

I don't KNOW you, so you aren't in that group.

Yssup Rider · 06-17-2015, 07:50 AM

You don't KNOW where Austin ends and Clarksville begins, ya closet queen.

timpage · 06-17-2015, 08:11 AM

Amusing. Issa's fellow republicans ran him out of Blumenthal's deposition yesterday.

>>>Former House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) tried to crash former Hillary Clinton adviser Sidney Blumenthal’s deposition before the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Tuesday.

Issa marched into the closed-door deposition and remained inside for about a minute before he was escorted out by the panel’s chairman, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.).

The pair briefly exchanged hushed words in a nearby hallway before Issa stormed off, throwing an empty soda can into a nearby trash bin.<<<<

http://thehill.com/policy/defense/24...azi-deposition

Whirlaway · 06-17-2015, 08:24 AM

More "amusing" and revealing....Hillary says Blumenthal provided "unsolicited" analysis of Benghazi, yet in her emails Clinton is quoted saying "keep em coming", "good information", "very useful"................truth is Blumenthal was backchannel conduit to Clinton on Benghazi.

Hillary's notion of "unsolicited" is completely different than most Americans....just more of the same = Clinton lies and deception.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015...os-to-clinton/

Quote:

Originally Posted by timpage

Amusing. Issa's fellow republicans ran him out of Blumenthal's deposition yesterday.

>>>Former House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) tried to crash former Hillary Clinton adviser Sidney Blumenthal’s deposition before the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Tuesday.

Issa marched into the closed-door deposition and remained inside for about a minute before he was escorted out by the panel’s chairman, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.).

The pair briefly exchanged hushed words in a nearby hallway before Issa stormed off, throwing an empty soda can into a nearby trash bin.<<<<

http://thehill.com/policy/defense/24...azi-deposition

Whirlaway · 06-17-2015, 08:25 AM

And let's not forget......Clinton and Kerry have not provided Congress with the relevant Benghazi emails. Keeping Congress from getting hold of emails from other Clinton close advisors.

timpage · 06-17-2015, 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

More "amusing" and revealing....Hillary says Blumenthal provided "unsolicited" analysis of Benghazi, yet in her emails Clinton is quoted saying "keep em coming", "good information", "very useful"................truth is Blumenthal was backchannel conduit to Clinton on Benghazi.

Hillary's notion of "unsolicited" is completely different than most Americans....just more of the same = Clinton lies and deception.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015...os-to-clinton/

So what if he was? Guess what shit-for-brains? Politicians use advisors, both formal and informal. WHERE'S THE FUCKING "SCANDAL"?

JD Barleycorn · 06-17-2015, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I didn't say it was ok. Those were your words. I'm merely pointing out they're all to be blamed. I'm glad we can agree on Bush and war crimes.

Then build a case numbnuts. What is your charge? That he lied? The same lie that Bill Clinton told us? Maybe it wasn't a lie. Maybe it was a mistake made by our intelligence services (and all the rest in the world) and not a lie. So what else do you have? That Iraqi died? Happens in every war. What else you got? That Americans died? Happens in every war and according to the Constitution it is the Congress that declares war and not the president. So Congress is more responsible for the war than the president though it is the president who conducts the war. So is that your final charge? That the war was fought poorly? Careful, you condemn Obama with your next words...and Johnson, Clinton, and Carter.

So what is your case? Lets see it. Pretend we're a grand jury.

So back to the OP. What did we find out this time? We found out that Sidney Blumenthal DID NOT write the emails that he sent to Hillary Clinton but he did not say who they came from thus adding another layer of deception to the mix. We also know that Hillary intentionally failed to deliver these emails which means a couple of things; she broke the law by not obeying the Congressional order and if she held these back then what else is she holding back?

timpage · 06-17-2015, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Then build a case numbnuts. What is your charge? That he lied? The same lie that Bill Clinton told us? Maybe it wasn't a lie. Maybe it was a mistake made by our intelligence services (and all the rest in the world) and not a lie. So what else do you have? That Iraqi died? Happens in every war. What else you got? That Americans died? Happens in every war and according to the Constitution it is the Congress that declares war and not the president. So Congress is more responsible for the war than the president though it is the president who conducts the war. So is that your final charge? That the war was fought poorly? Careful, you condemn Obama with your next words...and Johnson, Clinton, and Carter.

So what is your case? Lets see it. Pretend we're a grand jury.

So back to the OP. What did we find out this time? We found out that Sidney Blumenthal DID NOT write the emails that he sent to Hillary Clinton but he did not say who they came from thus adding another layer of deception to the mix. We also know that Hillary intentionally failed to deliver these emails which means a couple of things; she broke the law by not obeying the Congressional order and if she held these back then what else is she holding back?

Wait then......it goes deeper than we originally thought! There is a scandal within a scandal that relates back to the original imaginary scandal.

We must hold additional hearings!

Douche.