Ok, let's see. These are all copied and pasted from your own posts.
You first pontificated that the breakup of the plane was quick.
"They have yet to find the wreckage from the plane but they did discover that two passports were stolen and the two men who got on the plane were not them. Many of the experts agree that the destruction of the plane had to be quick as there was no squawk from the transponder or communications from the pilots."
They have now come out, after finding the piece, and said the landing was no doubt soft and the plane may have actually floated for a bit before sinking.
http://www.businessinsider.com/malay...-theory-2015-8
JDBarelyNuts - Wrong on count 1
Saw this little nugget in the same thread; you claim to know Leslie Nielsen, but you can't be bothered to even get his name correct with two tries.
"I've refrained from commenting but I knew
Leslie Nielson, he was a friend of mine, and you...are not
Leslie Nielson. So stop trying (badly) to steal his lines"
And then, in the same thread, the obligatory 'thanks a lot, Obama' as performed by JDBarelyNuts
"One good reason not to take responsibility right now is Obama. He is weak, he is embarassed, and he needs a distraction. If some group in Indonesia says that they are responsible then he can take them out (or say that he did). It would distract people, make him look good, and probably safely bump his approval ratings higher. No, Obama would not stay on the golf course with an opportunity like that. All he would have to risk would be a few lives of special ops guys and the sure nomination for another Nobel Peace Prize."
He's going to win a peace prize, by taking out terrorists. Only in the mind of JDjizzynuts
Here, he's thinking maybe it's because of the engineers who were on board.
"A. One theory that I have heard is that the passengers were taken by people unknown. Why? A lot of semiconductor engineers on board. No one would acknowledge taking them (taking credit) because that would justify an attack by the United States, Australia, China just to name a few of the countries involved."
And there's more
"B. Another theory is that the plane was taken to be used for a terrorist act someone else in the world. The plane has a working payload of about 15 tons. The passengers could be taken off, the plane filled with Semtex, repainted, the transponder signal changed, and some other target is going to be hit with a flying bomb. No one would acknowledge this because the operation is not complete yet.
Why tip off your target by telling the world you took a plane."
Yeah, why tip anyone off, it's only a goddamn plane that's missing. No one will notice.
And here it is, ladies and gentlemen, the piece de resistance:
"I never, and I heard no one else say it on this site, said anything about a small deserted island. There are many landing strips in the Pacific left over from World War II. We built them everywhere and never took them out. They won't be in the best shape but they could be
cleared for an operation like this and concealed again with potted trees and cargo netting.
I will answer your question for the third time. If this is an ongoing operation then you don't tip your hand by taking credit.
If this is a real crash then some terrorist organization COULD take credit for something they didn't do.
If this is some kind of quasi government op out of say...Pakistan, then Obama becomes very dangerous. Not because he is but because he really needs to change the subject from Russia, Benghazi, Syria. and the ACA. He just orders some guys to attack a compound, try to get back some hostages and he becomes a hero. I am sure that the Chinese would throw in with him as well. We supply the tech (ships, drones, missiles, infor) and China supplies the troops.
Considering how well Iran has hidden some of the sites, you can hide a 777 in the world today."
__________________
POTTED TREES AND CARGO NETTING
Here is the deal for the lying idiots.
