Providers VS. Civvie Chicks...who performs better in bed?

[TheAntichrist666]

I vote for the Providers...

[cinderbella]

Umm, that's a great compliment from a provider's standpoint- I beg to differ however. In my humble opinion, great sex is communication, chemistry and desire. Sorry but I was floored by your question. Usually, a provider is contacted when a gentleman cannot find the sexual communion "civie" in a woman he knows. A provider is basically a sure bet where you know you won't be rejected unlike in the dating/relationship world. However, for me nothing compares to the smell, touch, taste, sight and sound of someone you care about and trust your heart with. I enjoy my client's temporary affections but usually I remember more about the personality and discussion than the exchange. But I have every sigh, touch, squeeze, passionate gaze and longing etched into my memory that I have ever exchanged with a man who I was deep in love with. So I vote civie.

[TheAntichrist666]

I like your point of view ( :

[PhantomofTheOpera]

Cinderbella got it right. Nothing beats being with the one you desire and who desires you. That rules out providers in my book in matters of the heart. However, when it comes to the mechanics of doing the deed, I think the providers have an edge but only marginally.

[funagain2]

Civie sex is best by far. However, providers have added an erotic dimension back into my life that seemed to disappear long ago.

In some mysterious way, providers have greatly improved my civie sex life. It's hard to explain, but it is true !

[Fast Gunn]

That really depends on the specific type of performance you are seeking.

For just raw sex, a good provider will generally out perform a civilian as they have more practice and less inhibitions.

However, there generally won't be any emotional component to the sex from a provider.

If you're looking for the intimacy that comes with good sex then a civilian will typically provide that much better than a provider.

It's a matter of what you're looking for, but just beware of the strong emotional bonds that tend to develop with civilians.

Girls are quite emotional creatures.

. . . When it's time to break up with a civilian things tend to get very messy!

[TheAntichrist666]

Fast Gunn knows what I'm talking about. Sorry that I wasn't specific, but I was referring only to sex.

[funagain2]

Raw sex without emotional component ? The providers I have seen would win this one by a landslide. The uninhibited actions of the providers i have seen are spectacular.

[PhantomofTheOpera]

With no emotional component, I would agree that Providers will win that discussion due to the amount of practice they have over the civvies.

[CuteOldGuy]

Sex without love is an empty, meaningless experience. But as empty, meaningless experiences go, it's one of the best!

Woody Allen

[enderwiggin]

Originally Posted by cinderbella

Umm, that's a great compliment from a provider's standpoint- I beg to differ however. In my humble opinion, great sex is communication, chemistry and desire. Sorry but I was floored by your question. Usually, a provider is contacted when a gentleman cannot find the sexual communion "civie" in a woman he knows. A provider is basically a sure bet where you know you won't be rejected unlike in the dating/relationship world. However, for me nothing compares to the smell, touch, taste, sight and sound of someone you care about and trust your heart with. I enjoy my client's temporary affections but usually I remember more about the personality and discussion than the exchange. But I have every sigh, touch, squeeze, passionate gaze and longing etched into my memory that I have ever exchanged with a man who I was deep in love with. So I vote civie.

The question isn't who develops a better connection in bed. Or who communicates better. Or who touches you deeply and moves you. Or who generates the most intimacy... It's who performs better in bed.

On a strictly unemotional performance-based metric... providers, by and large. You occasionally come across (no pun intended) a dead-fish fuck, but for the most part, providers know how to give a service. I've come across (again, no pun intended) a few civies who perform at the same level, and when you throw in all the emotional shit... sure, there's no contest. But if you're asking who I more consistently have better sex with, its providers.

Too many girls out there who don't know how to suck a dick...

[plainjoe]

Based on further clarification, definitely PROVIDER – especially those that I prefer (mature, MILFy, professional ladies). They have the skills, experiences, and knowledge to keep me happy and satisfied.

[TheAntichrist666]

I agree with Enderwiggin.

[Cpalmson]

I would say civie sex is better b/c it builds the ego. There is no ego stroking when you P4P-- it is just getting your rocks off. On the other hand, when you get your rocks off with a partner who truly wants to be with you, that is totally different. Also, in civie sex, there are no upfront "rules". In civie sex, you find the boundaries naturally. About the only time I would say provider sex would be better than civie sex is if a provider offers herself OTC, then you get the best of both worlds.

[ICU 812]

Providers by a looong shot. Its not just menue and technique . . .hygene, and groomiing play a part. There may be a better chance of staying clear of clap with a provider today if you do your research.