According to the rumor, there was time together and some touching, but not what he thought he had paid for. Thus I'd argue it qualifies for a review.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushjumper
As no illegal acts transpired, mayhaps the Monderators will allow you to post her name 'in-the-clear'?
|
If touching of genitals or breasts were involved, it is illegal. So, in my stupid hobbyist opinion, we have to obey the ECCIE ownership's policy of masking.
I've even seem some instances where a hobbyist talked about the wonderfulness of a waitress or bartender with nothing but conversations involved, and had to mask off the name. I'm as confused as anyone about when to mask or not mask, but I choose to be conservative.
If you haven't read the following after the recent arrests, you should. All six of the women arrested were charged with this :
§ 21.07 PUBLIC LEWDNESS. (a) A person commits an offense if he knowingly engages in any of the following acts in a public place or, if not in a public place, he is reckless about whether another is present who will be offended or alarmed by his:
(1) act of sexual intercourse;
(2) act of deviate sexual intercourse;
(3) act of sexual contact; or
(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
§ 21.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
(1) "Deviate sexual intercourse" means:
(A) any contact between any part of the genitals of one person and the mouth or anus of another person; or
(B) the penetration of the genitals or the anus of another person with an object.
(2) "Sexual contact" means, except as provided by Section 21.11, any touching of the anus, breast, or any part of the genitals of another person with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person.
Maybe your lawyer could get you off by claiming you weren't trying to arouse or gratify anyone except yourself LMAO.