Newsweek GOP Lawmakers Decry Joe Biden's Executive Orders in Swift Bipartisan Split

[oeb11]

GOP Lawmakers Decry Joe Biden's Executive Orders in Swift Bipartisan Split


Comey: 'Republican Party has to be burned to the ground'









GOP Lawmakers Decry Joe Biden's Executive Orders in Swift Bipartisan Split









Republican lawmakers have rebuked President Joe Biden's raft of executive actions in his first day as commander-in-chief, a swift sign of partisan divisions continuing despite calls for unity.
© Win McNamee/AFP via Getty Images House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) arrives during Joe Biden's inauguration as the 46th President of the United States at the US Capitol in Washington on January 20, 2021. He has criticized some of President Biden's initial actions. Biden signed numerous orders on Wednesday, aimed at points such as tackling the COVID-19 crisis, climate change and racial equity. He also set about revoking multiple orders made by his predecessor Donald Trump.
While this has been welcomed by Democrats, their Republican counterparts have expressed reservations over Biden's actions.
"On day one, Biden has set the tone for what is to come in his administration: legislating by executive orders, championing massive spending bills, and supporting far-left priorities that reverse years of economic growth and job creation," Rep. Bryan Steil (R-WI) said in a statement, adding this came despite Biden "promising to work for unity."





What Joe Biden Has Promised To Do In His First 100 Days As President

• 
• 

Rep. Kat Cammack (R-FL) expressed similar sentiments, suggesting Biden's actions "cater to the left."

"President Biden's inaugural address focused heavily on unity, bringing the nation together after the division we've experienced," Cammack said.
"The new EOs he just signed, however, cater to the Left, ignoring the steps necessary to move America forward."
Cammack and Steil have both taken issue with Biden's decision to block the building of the Keystone XL pipeline, a Canada-U.S. oil pipeline.
Cammack also criticized re-entering the Paris Climate Agreement, reversing Trump's decision to pull out of it.
Steil also mentioned the support for giving 11 million undocumented migrants a path to citizenship.
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) also picked up on this point.
In a statement, he said: "The Biden plan to offer citizenship to more than 11 million illegal immigrants who have, for years, knowingly broken our laws is the wrong policy at the wrong time."
He said that Republicans will highlight flaws in Biden's immigration plans "in the days and weeks ahead."
Congresswoman Liz Cheney (R- WY) also criticized the orders, pointing to the climate accord, Keystone XL pipeline and points on immigration.
"Rejoining the deeply flawed Paris Climate Accord and blocking the Keystone XL Pipeline will eliminate jobs, increase the cost of energy, and embolden our adversaries," Cheney said in a statement.
"Meanwhile, blocking funding for important border security enhancements, including the continued construction of the wall, lays the foundation for increased illegal immigration.
"We face significant challenges that require bipartisan responses. Today's Executive Orders reverse important policies and impose significant economic cost that will imperil our recovery."
Biden's actions were described as "misguided" by Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-WA)
"President Biden's misguided day-one priorities are beyond concerning for those of us who have worked to strengthen border security, promote innovation, and work toward American energy independence," he said on Twitter.
Biden's campaign announced on Wednesday his intention to reverse many actions of the prior administration and other executive actions he would lay out.


Fiden's " unity" - is lockstep jackboot compliance with the DPST?CCP ideology - or face teh re-education camps

In a nutshell!

[00 gauge]

Yeah don't think for a minute that biden's "intentions to reverse many actions of the prior administration" or his "plan to offer citizenship to more than 11 million illegal immigrants who have, for years, knowingly broken our laws" as being any intent to offer unity .....

[nevergaveitathought]

first thing the biden white house took down off the presidential website is the 1776 report

something that all school children should be taught

it explains and addresses most things about America

I wonder if joe even knows it was taken down

[rexdutchman]

Just Brilliant the galactic incompetence of the dark winter has started

[oeb11]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

first thing the biden white house took down off the presidential website is the 1776 report

something that all school children should be taught

it explains and addresses most things about America

I wonder if joe even knows it was taken down

They replace it with hannah-joes 16219 project screed - part of eh 'property destruction of republicans is not Violence' propaganda.
this from a black woman who dyes her hair red to deny her own African American origins.



‘1619 Project’ Founder Melts Down After Criticism Of Her Fake History

https://thefederalist.com/2020/10/16...-fake-history/
The lead writer of The New York Times’ anti-American “1619 Project” suffered a meltdown last week when a colleague at her paper offered fair criticism of its revisionist and inaccurate account of history.
On Oct. 9, New York Times columnist Bret Stephens published a more than 3,000-word essay outlining the project’s blunders that have led the academics with the National Association of Scholars (NAS) to call on the Pulitzer Prize Board to revoke its award to the project’s chief essayist, Nikole Hannah-Jones.
“Journalists are, most often, in the business of writing the first rough draft of history, not trying to have the last word on it,” Stephens wrote. “We are best when we try to tell truths with a lowercase t, following evidence in directions unseen, not the capital-T truth of a pre-established narrative in which inconvenient facts get discarded. And we’re supposed to report and comment on the political issues of the day, not become the issue itself.”
Under this model, Stephens writes, “for all of its virtues, buzz, spinoffs and a Pulitzer Prize – the 1619 Project has failed.”
At the heart of his criticism is the project’s central thesis to revise the date of America’s “true founding” to the year 1619, when the first African slaves found their way to the colonies (Native American tribes had kept slaves on the continent for centuries by then). Several months after the campaign’s launch, now that it is infecting some 4,500 K-12 classrooms, the legacy newspaper stealth-edited the project to remove the language of its “true founding” to when the “moment [America] began.”
“These were not minor points,” Stephen wrote. “The deleted assertions went to the core of the project’s most controversial goal, ‘to reframe American history by considering what it would mean to regards 1619 as our nation’s birth year.”
The criticism sent the architect of the project into a rage, according to the Washington Post, predictably calling the fair-minded critiques of her deceptive scholarship racist.
“Hannah-Jones, though, was livid, and let Kingsbury and Stephens know it in emails ahead of publication,” the Post reported. “One the day the NAS called for the revocation of her Pulitzer, she tweeted that efforts to discredit her work ‘put me in a long tradition of [Black women] who failed to know their places.’ She changed her Twitter bio to ‘slanderous and nasty-minded mulattress’ – a tribute to the trailblazing journalist Ida B. Wells, whom the Times slurred with those same words in 1894.”
The revisionist project, which has attracted sharp scrutiny since its publication last year, has since maintained full editorial support from the newspaper despite major corrections to its essays and leagues of historians debunking its primary claims.
After a group of leading historians objected to the Times’ project’s false information, the magazine’s Editor in Chief Jake Silverstein wrote back that “historical understanding is not fixed.” In other words, the Times doesn’t care what historians with decades of experience think if it counters the religious narrative that critical race theory demands.
Several months later, the Times finally did issue a two-word correction to its lead essay authored by none other than Hannah-Jones clarifying that keeping slavery was only a primary motivation for some of the colonists rather than all of the colonists to seek independence from Great Britain. While it might seem a minor change, it’s actually a significant one provided that the project has been adopted widely into curriculum teaching children the United States was built for the sole purpose to oppress, a key tenet of the left’s critical race theory driving the nation’s 21st century woke revolution.
It’s worth noting this correction was made before the Pulitzer committee awarded Hannah-Jones its prestigious prize based on an essay that the Times admitted was historically inaccurate.
Despite the corrections, the inaccuracies, the controversies, and the criticisms of the project, Dean Baquet, the executive director of the Times, rejected Stephens’ arguments.
“Our readers, and I believe our country, have benefited immensely from the principles, rigorous and groundbreaking journalism of Nikole,” Baquet wrote, celebrating the work of the same writer who said “it would be an honor” for the nation’s explosion of deadly unrest which tore through the cities this summer to be named”the 1619 Riots.”

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

first thing the biden white house took down off the presidential website is the 1776 report

something that all school children should be taught

it explains and addresses most things about America

I wonder if joe even knows it was taken down

Bullshit. It’s revisionist history, spun to the tastes of the religious white.

They did that in Texas, even demoting Thomas Jefferson and removing Mexican AMERICAN studies and mentions of Cesar Chavez from the textbooks.

Biden is a religious man, but he’s not gonna let the Bible thumpers back into the drivers seat like Bush did.

I applaud that action, along with most of the others he’s taken this far. Trumps existed only to antagonize and divide so his fascist coup would succeed.

He came very close.

But that doesn’t mean the knuckleheaded conspiracies, revisionist history and lies that preceded him are now OK again.

Five dollar fine for whining fellas.