Have a little CLASS, before you tattoo your ASS -or- Think before you Ink, part II

[Sickpuppy]

“Think before you think” brought all the little heads to attention, defending their preferences and ingratiating themselves to all the overly-tattooed ladies out there. Even many of the overly tattooed chicks chimed in, in their own defense (what choice do they have now?) Face it, tattooing is a fad, with (semi) permanent repercussions. Fads come and go, like paisley, leisure suits, men’s white dress shoes, culottes, bouffant hair, big gas guzzling cars with fins, disco, tie-dye and bell bottoms. When you change your mind, you can just bury the outdated clothes in your closet or donate them to your favorite charity when they go out of style, you can get a haircut, trade-in that car or switch to rap music. The problem is tattooing is semi-permanent and painful to remove. How many famous and/or otherwise important beautiful women display their tattoos (if any) with pride? Even the movie stars that have succumbed to the “I want to be hip like the little people trend” generally hide their tats with heavy makeup when on screen. To paraphrase Winston when reproached at a party: Yes madam, I am drunk, and you’ve got too many ugly tattoos. Tomorrow I’ll be sober and you’ll still have too many ugly tattoos.

[Gotyour6]

What do you care and why start another thread on an already on going thread?

[Alyssa Marie]

Dad!!???????

Oh, no.. It's just you again.

Go parent your own children. We are all adults here.

[MochaNautteBBW]

Tattooing has been thousands of years:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_tattooing

I hardly call tattooing a "fad"

If someone doesn't like my tattoos or the fact that I want to get more tattoos: I don't care what others think.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by Sickpuppy

“Think before you think” brought all the little heads to attention, defending their preferences and ingratiating themselves to all the overly-tattooed ladies out there. Even many of the overly tattooed chicks chimed in, in their own defense (what choice do they have now?) Face it, tattooing is a fad, with (semi) permanent repercussions. Fads come and go, like paisley, leisure suits, men’s white dress shoes, culottes, bouffant hair, big gas guzzling cars with fins, disco, tie-dye and bell bottoms. When you change your mind, you can just bury the outdated clothes in your closet or donate them to your favorite charity when they go out of style, you can get a haircut, trade-in that car or switch to rap music. The problem is tattooing is semi-permanent and painful to remove. How many famous and/or otherwise important beautiful women display their tattoos (if any) with pride? Even the movie stars that have succumbed to the “I want to be hip like the little people trend” generally hide their tats with heavy makeup when on screen. To paraphrase Winston when reproached at a party: Yes madam, I am drunk, and you’ve got too many ugly tattoos. Tomorrow I’ll be sober and you’ll still have too many ugly tattoos.

Speaking of drinking, are you drunk today? Or are you a masochist? You made your argument in the other thread and got minimal support but you feel compelled to try to proselytize to people again--so for some inexplicable reason you have decided your subjective opinion is important enough that you have to start a second thread that adds no additional insights to the conversation. It remains just as it was: a lady's personal prerogative that you don't really get a vote on. The only vote you get is whether you wish to see her.

I have zero tattoos. It isn't something I care to do and I really doubt I ever will. However the delightful young lady I just walked down to her car has a number of tattoos. I am totally ambivalent about her ink, but unlike you I have no problem at all seeing past the tattoos and seeing the really awesome woman who happens to be wearing them. It really is your loss that you would be too distracted by the tattoos to see past them--she is a great escort and a far better friend.

[watchoutthegameisrigged]

This man is obviously on a crusade. If you don't like providers with tats, choose otherwise. Otherwise, shut the fuck up. We don't care. We get it, you don't like tats. Gotcha.

[Chica Chaser]

Originally Posted by watchoutthegameisrigged

This man is obviously on a crusade. If you don't like providers with tats, choose otherwise. Otherwise, shut the fuck up. We don't care. We get it, you don't like tats. Gotcha.

Well thats not very polite. No no, please let him carry on....its kinda fun to watch the return volley. If the OP is so hell-bent on getting the shit kicked out of him, and publicly stoned, who are we to stand in his way?

If you don't like the subject matter, feel free to not open this thread again.
See, it works both ways.

[dynamitekid]

The more ink I see, the harder I be...

[Sickpuppy]

I’ve yet to see one comment offering intelligent support FOR excessive body ink, all I keep seeing is that it’s YOUR preference or MY (provider’s) personal preference and that if I don’t like it, too bad. Problem is, when it’s excessive and visible, the rest of us can’t just ignore it any more. It’s just body graffiti to most of us and just as unattractive – if you want to do it, do it where the rest of us don’t have to look at it. We need a filter for tats just like age, ethnicity, location, build, cup, waist, hips, breast, height, weight, eye color, hair color and hair length. Or, do the little heads (and tattooed providers) deny the validity of using those filters, too? If so, you’re more hypocritical than you’ll admit.

[~Ze~]

Don't throw the hypocrite word around. I am sure your parents/grandparents/boss/deacon/store clerk/banker would LOVE to know you pay money to fuck whores in the first place, tattoo'd or not... -_-

Go spread your morals and preferences some fucking other place.

[Sickpuppy]

Originally Posted by ~Ze~

Don't throw the hypocrite word around. I am sure your parents/grandparents/boss/deacon/store clerk/banker would LOVE to know you pay money to fuck whores in the first place, tattoo'd or not... -_-

Go spread your morals and preferences some fucking other place.

How can anyone find you? Other than searching "really strange"? Even your website is weird. Please go back on your medication.

[RandB fan]

Originally Posted by dynamitekid

The more ink I see, the harder I be...

I'd personally prefer to do something like this http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1068006&highlight= but I will say she (above link) reminds me of an ex except mine didn't have "rimanere" across multiple areas of her body.
Think about this God made different flavors and colors for a reason. So we could enjoy what we wanted to enjoy not eat or wear someone else's favorite.

now log off the asylums community computer before they explain to you that your opinion doesn't mean shit to anyone else since I doubt you signed yourself in therefor you can't sign yourself out.....

[MaxiMilyen]

Maybe it's not just a fad.....

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/histor...038580/?no-ist

here's a snippet:

What is the earliest evidence of tattoos?

In terms of tattoos on actual bodies, the earliest known examples were for a long time Egyptian and were present on several female mummies dated to c. 2000 B.C. But following the more recent discovery of the Iceman from the area of the Italian-Austrian border in 1991 and his tattoo patterns, this date has been pushed back a further thousand years when he was carbon-dated at around 5,200 years old.

[JohnnyYanks]

Originally Posted by Sickpuppy

I’ve yet to see one comment offering intelligent support FOR excessive body ink, all I keep seeing is that it’s YOUR preference or MY (provider’s) personal preference and that if I don’t like it, too bad. Problem is, when it’s excessive and visible, the rest of us can’t just ignore it any more.

Why not? There's no law that says you have to be around other people.


It’s just body graffiti to most of us

What is this plurality you speak of? Please cite. Are you the spokesperson?

and just as unattractive – if you want to do it, do it where the rest of us don’t have to look at it.

Or, as mentioned, you could remain away from those inked-up people you so despise.

We need a filter for tats just like age, ethnicity, location, build, cup, waist, hips, breast, height, weight, eye color, hair color and hair length. Or, do the little heads (and tattooed providers) deny the validity of using those filters, too?

What is this filter and why must we have one? How does it work? Tell more.

If so, you’re more hypocritical than you’ll admit.

I don't think you've come close to establishing this yet. More please.

[aWickedDon]

Originally Posted by dynamitekid

The more ink I see, the harder I be...

Hell yes. Will someone PLEASE POST MORE PICS like the fine ass tatted up chik in your post. And keeping with the rhyming theme...If your a tatted up chik, come sit on my.....


Lol.