Teabaggers and republicans: misogynic till their last breath

[Munchmasterman]

23 repub congresspersons voted against the house version of The Violence Against Women Act.

23 potential independents.

In the senate, the bill was approved 68-31.

Every female repub senator voted for the bill.

How much more out of touch could the misogynic teabagger and repub parties be? The only thing they are in touch with are male congressional pages.

[Randy4Candy]

Are you asking that about today, yesterday,or tomorrow? They just need to keep it up and they'll find relief, rather, they'll be relieved.

[Guest123018-4]

I see the mastermanmuncher and randy4boys like being on top of one another.
Did you read the act?

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

23 repub congresspersons voted against the house version of The Violence Against Women Act.

23 potential independents.

In the senate, the bill was approved 68-31.

Every female repub senator voted for the bill.

How much more out of touch could the misogynic teabagger and repub parties be? The only thing they are in touch with are male congressional pages.

What's this war on woman? Could you please explain it?

[dilbert firestorm]

that's a knee jerk response to the that vote.

did it occur to you that there may be a problem in the legislation that 23 republicans voted against.

[CuteOldGuy]

What did the bill say? Have you read it, Munchie? Unless we know what the bill says, we won't know if it was a good bill or not. Tell us, Munchie, since you must have read it.

[joe bloe]

I assume you must mean misogynist or misogynistic. Misogynic isn't a real word, nitwit.
The Demonrat's stupid tactic of saying that Republicans are waging a war on women isn't working.

A CBS/New York Times poll found that Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee, now leads among women voters by 46 to 44 per cent, an eight-point swing towards the former Massachusetts governor in just one month.
The poll suggested that Democratic claims of a ‘war on women’ led by Republicans have been treated with scepticism by voters.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2145027/Obama-talks-gay-marriage-The-View-new-poll-shows-Romney-leads-female-voters.html#ixzz1v61fFOlM

[CuteOldGuy]

Apparently a lot of women hate women. Interesting.

What DID that bill say, Munchie?

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Apparently a lot of women hate women. Interesting.

What DID that bill say, Munchie?

I thought his nickname was Munchmasterbater.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

I thought his nickname was Munchmasterbater.

I call him Munch4Randy....LOL

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

What's this war on woman? Could you please explain it?

Other than the fact that's not the topic of this post, the fact your mind is so set in concrete that you would drown in 5 inches of water, and since you bitch about cutting and pasting, you'll just have to do your own research.
A word to the wise (and you too), don't ask speedman, 2bitches, or cog for help.

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

that's a knee jerk response to the that vote.

did it occur to you that there may be a problem in the legislation that 23 republicans voted against.

No shit sherlock. It did occur to me there were some problems. That's why 23 House Republicans voted against it. Or are you pointing out the fact that republicans vote against some bills even when there is nothing wrong with them?

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

What did the bill say? Have you read it, Munchie? Unless we know what the bill says, we won't know if it was a good bill or not. Tell us, Munchie, since you must have read it.

Then read it you fucking moron. Jesus Fucking Christ!

A few things.
I’ve read enough to form an opinion. And I agree with 23 House Republicans and 68% of the Senate. When can the knowledge that virtually no Congressperson reads an entire bill. Especially if the person is not an attorney. Huge percentages of the pages are nothing but lawyer speak. They have to make it so there are no loop holes left that can totally negate the intent of the law. Claiming someone who hasn’t read an entire piece of legislation can’t know if it’s good or not, is bullshit. They have a staff to read other bills and to put the bills together. Duh.

Not my job to keep you up with the times. Everyone on this site knows why I’m not going to waste my time explaining something to you. If only you had read it.

If you had read it we could have discussed it.

[CuteOldGuy]

You haven't read it at all, have you? I figured. Next!

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

I assume you must mean misogynist or misogynistic. Misogynic isn't a real word, nitwit.
The Demonrat's stupid tactic of saying that Republicans are waging a war on women isn't working.

A CBS/New York Times poll found that Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee, now leads among women voters by 46 to 44 per cent, an eight-point swing towards the former Massachusetts governor in just one month.
The poll suggested that Democratic claims of a ‘war on women’ led by Republicans have been treated with scepticism by voters.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2145027/Obama-talks-gay-marriage-The-View-new-poll-shows-Romney-leads-female-voters.html#ixzz1v61fFOlM

Suck my dick, bitch!
miso.jpg

[CuteOldGuy]

Here ya go, Munchie. Now, tell us. What are the good parts of this bill that would warrant passage?

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr4970

Remember, you brought it up. Why does opposing this bill make one misogynic?

Oh, and what is a "potential independent"?

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

You haven't read it at all, have you? I figured. Next!

Like I said. Why waste my time. I plainly stated I had not and no one except the staff ever does. If you say you have read an entire bill, each and every word, then you are a liar or a moron. I’ll leave it up to you which one you are.
You're a tough piece of Kansas turf that the water of knowledge runs off of before any of the moister can't be absorbed. That it takes submersion to allow any to make into your head.


And you still haven’t read any of it.