Question for the Gents? And the Ladies?

[Guest012418-1]

Gents - What percentage of hobbyists do you think are in the hobby because of the spice of variety? I personally suspect this number to be fairly high.

Ladies - What are your thoughts on a Provider getting mad at a Client for wanting to see another Provider and refusing to provide a reference? I personally think it is a double disrespect. 1. She's refusing to assist her newbie client to get established in the hobby.
2. She's refusing to assist her fellow Provider in staying safe in this industry. As well as .... your thoughts???

Please add to ....

[Guest123018]

Originally Posted by Slayde

Ladies - What are your thoughts on a Provider getting mad at a Client for wanting to see another Provider and refusing to provide a reference?

Why don't you tell us since I just asked you for a client reference a couple days ago and you have Ignored me.

Good thing I check all my other resources for screening since you're a flake about providing a simple reference to other providers.


Why don't you let the other providers
know that you ask for references but
you don't provide them for the guys.

Oh, and let the guys know this so
they'll know not to use you as a reference

[Dickjonesbr]

Seeking~P why do you jump down everyone's throats when they make a post?

[Dickjonesbr]

To answer your question slayde I would say it's 50/50. Some for different experiences and the others for $$

[ilovethemgirls68]

85% money/support certain material lifestyle, 15% alternative lifestyle variety

[televill]

Variety is always crucial. Hard to be with only 1 woman.

[MOCHAakaMOCHA]

Originally Posted by Slayde

Ladies - What are your thoughts on a Provider getting mad at a Client for wanting to see another Provider and refusing to provide a reference? I personally think it is a double disrespect. 1. She's refusing to assist her newbie client to get established in the hobby.
2. She's refusing to assist her fellow Provider in staying safe in this industry. As well as .... your thoughts???

I am 100% reference friendly (giving & receiving) and want to make that disclaimer before I get to my problem with number 2.

It is NOT the responsibility of another provider to keep you safe. That is YOUR job. Reference exchange imo is just good manners and can be nice and helpful.....to a degree (we all know sometimes a client can be great to 1 lady and a dick to the next). But it's a courtesy not a right.
It's tacky if the provider I ask for a ref check from doesn't respond but I don't care because I have other ways to screen .... another ho won't stop my dough lol.

The client should probably also know about the unresponsive provider so he can avoid wasting his time trying to use her in the future (and probably avoid seeing her in the future too).

[Lena Duvall]

A jealousy self-alert thread perhaps?

In ways, I do agree with Mocha that a provider doesn't have to respond to a reference request. But I think unless she clearly states that to her clients on the front end before they book a date with her, it is disingenuous and downright disrespectful.

The way I see it, the only reason reference withholding escorts aren't transparent with their clients about the fact that they do not give references and instead wait until the moment he is trying to set up a date with someone else is because they know it may affect the clients decision to even see them at all.

This goes back to the first portion of the (maybe self-snitching ) original post. Why would one who seeks to share space with different providers for the purpose of fulfilling various fantasies want to do so with a jealous and petty client-hoarding-ho who will actively undermine his attempts to branch out and engage with other providers? Who is out here trying to pay good money for possessive behavior?

[MOCHAakaMOCHA]

I mean I left out it's sneaky (and shady) as fuck for a provider to not clearly state in her ads on profiles that she does not give references (or doesn't participate in the reference system AT all (not even giving them). BUT I definitely think they should be very transparent about that (just like race/age policies etc).
HOWEVER lol I think they already know a lot of prospective clients esp newbies ones would stay away as soon as they saw that (as they probably should).

[gimme_that]

Originally Posted by Dickjonesbr

Seeking~P why do you jump down everyone's throats when they make a post?

Nah man. If a chick is not providing refs...but has the nerve to complain about others not doing what she is doing......seeking p's gripe is warranted. I'd definitely want to know which ladies don't provide good refs. At least for me a ref is anywhere between 700 and 2000 a meeting. Not tryna see a provider who oesnt have enough confidence to provide a ref or ok......


The more talented the provider reference, the less likely the new provider will call them. Lol

[Wiley64]

Originally Posted by gimme_that

Nah man. If a chick is not providing refs...but has the nerve to complain about others not doing what she is doing......seeking p's gripe is warranted. I'd definitely want to know which ladies don't provide good refs. At least for me a ref is anywhere between 700 and 2000 a meeting. Not tryna see a provider who oesnt have enough confidence to provide a ref or ok......


The more talented the provider reference, the less likely the new provider will call them. Lol

I think the question was not meant as to why seekers p is irritated, its more of why are you being antagonistic and bringing up a gripe between two providers on the board. If you have a personal issue with someone, discuss it privately or in the appropriate area.(powder room) maybe. Otherwise it turns into a drama filled pile on thread.
IMO if a provider doesn't give refs either because she is busy or hoarding a client, I could give a rats ass about it. There are other avenues for verification. I wouldn't depend on the word of a stranger to confirm my safety.

[Guest123018]

Far from Irritated. Just pointing out the fact on Slayde whining about another provider not giving a reference when she doesn't.

Slayde didn't start the threAD In the Powder Room so I wouldn't go to the Powder Room to address her. She started this threAD right here In Coed
so I commented on It here In Coed.

I thought Coed was for discussion. Slayde started this, so I'm discussing as others are ....

If I read her post correctly,
Slayde asked for feedback on thoughts
and to
Please add to ....

[Wiley64]

Slayde asked some questions. Her post being whiny is your opinion. The coed is for discussion not for attacking other members when you have a beef with them.Your response is antagonistic and based on the query by dickjones, I'm not the only one seeing it that way.

[Guest123018]

Huh? What attack?
She admitted her guilt by not responding here through her omission.
I'm not the only one seeing It that way, If she's not gonna
give references that's fine by me but don't start a threAD
about another provider not giving a reference when she doesn't

[Wiley64]

I'm not going to argue about with you about it here. Done