Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again
... You fellows got Salty here with better details. (me "insiders")
Reckon both sides just agreed to pick themselves up and head home.
Smartmatic was onto Newsmax for "defamation" while Newsmax's
defence was that it was just printing whatever "facts" about
Smartmatic and machines that other news outlets had mentioned.
... Smartmatic was really after a Punitive damage award $$$$$
and the Judge surely denyed them that. .... So them's the breaks.
And thus - the CONFIDENTIAL settlement was reached.
Therefore, I (and me political insiders) cannot reveal anything
about the settlement because it's Confidential. .... Sorry.
#### Salty
|
Is that what the Judge did? I don't know Salty. The Sergeant Schultz defense doesn't work long term.
I'm sure we'll find out what happened just in time for the next election denial cycle.
But ye surely spin a good tale.