Quote:
Originally Posted by Analeese
because this site is not for us just like JJ said...
Would you guys really want us to write about you and all the things that we have to sometimes endure that we smile through during an encounter?
At the end of the day ....yes some of us care about enjoying ourselves but there are a few key things that are the upmost importance for majority of ladies..
1. Did you research the answers you needed without asking
2. Did you follow instructions
3. Were you a gentleman/behaved
4. Did you show up/on time
5. Did you bring what was required
6. Was your hygiene up to par?
7. Did I make it out safely?
Everything else is just noise honestly....
Might sound harsh but lots of truth in this imo
When we check a reference this is where some of those questions are answered along with the research a lady does on her own...
Without talking about details in the ladies area ..cause I’m not allowed to...we don’t go back there to bash men or talk shit ...we use it for our safety and screening...and generally it’s to report problems with guys here....
The ladies writing encounter reports would either just be another ego boost for you guys or really hurt your ego
|
The first part of your post I highlighted is something that I do not get, if you have to
endure a client, then why not end the session when you feel you are possibly so grossed out or not enjoying yourself at all?
I do agree with the second portion I highlighted is pretty much the same as the qualifications of receiving an OK from a provider on p411. And just as you said, anything else that a provider says about a hobbyist is non applicable noise that has nothing to do with if he is good/not good to see for a BCD appointment. When a provider says good or bad things about a hobbyist, the first question that should be asked is, "Did she see him for a session?". That will tell you alot one way or the other on her opinion(s) that they are either vendetta/agenda related and as you say, just noise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Rogers
The only guys that would have a problem with it are the ones who have to be worried about a negative report. Treat the women with respect and there won’t be any problems.
|
I agree. Even if a provider goes off on the deep end, cease communications with her and move on to another one, it lets her know that you as a client are in the hobby for nothing else but fun.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastTexasGrown
Although the OP titled this thread to include Encounter Report, I feel there are some who are reading way to much into what he was suggestion.
The ladies do not need a ROS Section in their version. But a few simple things for a provider to fill out after an encounter. The OP listed 2 ... "Yes, Encounter went smoothly" and "No, Client NCNS". Analeese listed a few more possibilities that are basic to what a Provider might need to know.
Having this form in the Powder Room might help speed things up for the guys who are wanting to see a new provider on a spur of the moment type visit. It would also save in having to contact all the references. Of course you could contact a few based on their encounter just to get a better explanation of what they might be referring to if a small comment section were include for say up to 120 characters.
But no full out review. We all know Eccie would lose more than half its male base if a full review with ROS was allowed in the Powder Room.
|
I agree, no reviews by providers, the guys are the ones paying. The problem with providers honestly and fully reviewing their encounters with hobbyists will no doubt make the provider lose business and money. If she says a particular hobbyist is the best she has ever had, then the others who have seen her will definitely not see her again or if a provider says anything negative about a hobbyist's looks, body, ect. who is or possibly could be a regular client who is safe, treats her with respect and has the proper donation, then he definitely will not be back to see her!