Provider is hurt by my review

[txspud]

I certainly didn't mean to insult her, but ECCIE asks for physical description. I thought the encounter was top notch, but she's 54, has weighed a lot more than she does now, and doesn't have the body of 20 year old. She's absolutely, in no way, fat. No big deal to me, she's still one hell of a woman. I sent her a "thank you" PM, as I thought we hit it off pretty good, and included a link to the review. Only meant as a compliment to her skills, but she said it hurt her and made her more self-conscious. The harder I tried to get my point across (in PMs), the deeper I dug my hole. Now I'm wishing I hadn't said so much. I do want to see her again.



Was I a little too descriptive, or does it read as a positive review?

Did the Appointment take place at the agreed-upon time?: Yes
Activities: LFK, body worship, daty, bbbj, doggie, mish
Session Length: 1 hr
Fee: $$.5
Hair Length and Color: below shoulders, reddish brown
Age: 54
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: A real woman, taller, 5'9", 155 lbs, pretty smile, large natural breasts(still holding up), shapely ass, a little extra skin from recent weight loss, but absolutely not a distraction.
(Staff edit)
Recommendation: Yes

[Annika]

Originally Posted by txspud

I certainly didn't mean to insult her, but ECCIE asks for physical description. I thought the encounter was top notch, but she's 54, has weighed a lot more than she does now, and doesn't have the body of 20 year old. She's absolutely, in no way, fat. No big deal to me, she's still one hell of a woman. I sent her a "thank you" PM, as I thought we hit it off pretty good, and included a link to the review. Only meant as a compliment to her skills, but she said it hurt her and made her more self-conscious. The harder I tried to get my point across (in PMs), the deeper I dug my hole. Now I'm wishing I hadn't said so much. I do want to see her again.



Was I a little too descriptive, or does it read as a positive review?

Did the Appointment take place at the agreed-upon time?: Yes
Activities: LFK, body worship, daty, bbbj, doggie, mish
Session Length: 1 hr
Fee: $$.5
Hair Length and Color: below shoulders, reddish brown
Age: 54
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: A real woman, taller, 5'9", 155 lbs, pretty smile, large natural breasts(still holding up), shapely ass, a little extra skin from recent weight loss, but absolutely not a distraction.
The Rest of the Story: (staff edit)
Recommendation: Yes

Hey it happens you can't please everyone in life
And No 54 year old MILF is perfect ...
At least you gave her a yes!!!

All you have to do is look at his reviews and you can tell who this provider is! Te**50

[cabletex7]

Wow!

You wished you hadn't said so much and decided to say some more. Also, like the way you removed any references to the provider. Because no one is going to figure this shit out.

Now, if only somewhere here there was some guidance or discussion on revealing your own ROS.

[gimme_that]

Since we don't know which provider this is.........its better to assume any provider in this age range and weight will have loose nondistracting skin..........

I read this post about the policy in another thread...that a mod clarified on.

Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

I've always wondered about this one and have seen mods rule differently on it over the years. You're right, simple answers are often not clear. So here's the deal, and it's the definitive ruling.

Obviously revealing or specifically referring to other's ROS or other Private content is a violation of Guideline#20.

In regards to discussing/quoting/reiterating your own posts that were private but you now choose to make public, you are allowed to do so. There is no violation as long as, in doing so, you do not reveal anyone else's private content in the process.

The goal of Guideline#20 is to to protect OTHER people's private posts not to disallow sharing of your OWN, similar to being able to reveal your OWN medical condition but not ANOTHER persons.

This prevents restriction of, for instance, making a post in the Men's Lounge and then making the exact same post in Coed in a new thread. Also, in the case of a lady's coed rebuttal of a review such as this one, the gentleman can choose to quote his own review to alleviate concerns or clarify the situation as he chooses.

Without the ability to do so his reputation may be damaged or people without premium access could get the wrong idea as the lady is free to say whatever she wishes but he cannot discuss the session in detail since he has already done so in his review.

I hope that's more clear. And, as Pistolero has said, this is a definitive answer from the powers that be.

[CS25]

I don't think your description needed to include one thing. Reference to her boobs still holding up. That is assumed by anyone unless you state differently. The excess skin may be what she is most self conscious about and understandably so. However, it is part of the description of her physique and should be shared so that there are no surprises for other hobbyists.

I thought the review was very positive in regard to her as a sexy and engaging provider. You made clear she is skilled and aimed to please. Nothing wrong about that.

[gimme_that]

Next time post a fluffy "butter her up" description in the visible part of the review......then post the real description in your ROS.

[DMike]

lol it is what it is

[Gladiator69]

looks like an informative and positive review to me spud

[JayceeRivers]

I mean this as advice but I do believe the rest of the story is suppose to remain private for many reasons including safety of both the lady and yourself.

[Old-T]

I read the review you posted here, and while it is difficult to truly tell if ANY review is accurate (other than the ones a person writes themself), yours seems reasonable and certainly non-hostile.

I do believe there are certain standards that a lady should be able to expect in any review:

--Accuracy. Though not necessarily completeness. Saying "she had a few tattoos nicely done and not distracting" is fine, but going into detail like "She a few tattoos, one that says 'To my dearest Freddie, love always, Sally' in blue ink down her left leg", is probably a good detail to leave out.

--No hostility--unless the intent is to report a rip-off, dangerous encounter, etc. There are a number of ways to say "She is a 54 year old who looks good for her age". It can be done with a positive or a condescending tone, even in print. Or a hostile, demeaning one.

--No revealing secrets--details about her incall, a special rate she gave you, services not on her posted menu, etc.

I thought your words were generally positive, and assuming they were accurate, I don't think I would feel and guilt about the review.

[cabletex7]

Shoulda used the sarcasm font.

[Cpalmson]

Why hasn't a mod edited this thread? ROS has been revealed. I would do it but I'm on my ohobe and don't have full access to the site.

[thebuffmantraples]

Originally Posted by Cpalmson

Why hasn't a mod edited this thread? ROS has been revealed. I would do it but I'm on my ohobe and don't have full access to the site.

Read post #4

[DiamondJohn]

Correct me if I'm wrong. But, isn't 54 a GILF?

[pyramider]

What would a 33 year old with grandbrats be categorized?