Remembering the future sentencing of Dr Anthony Fauci

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Some easy listening music to read by:

Remember that whole kerfuffle over bats-ass soup with the covid? You know, where scientist's first instincts were it looked engineered, i.e. man made in a lab, then Fauci called them and they changed their minds. Then a few months later they received large government "grants" to continue researching other stuff.

Remember, back in the day, when "Fauci once argued for risky viral experiments — even if they can lead to pandemic", in regards to gain of function research? Hopefully, you also remember that under O'Bama - gain of funtion research was banned in the USA. Later we found out about Dr Peter Daszk at EcoHealth using NIAID grant money (your tax dollars) at the Wuhan Lab for just such gain of function stuff. Though they sure made it hard to follow the email trail, but they did eventually find the emails. Well... hold those thoughts for a moment.

Remember even further back (1980's) when Fauci was involved with or around discovery and isolation of the virus that causes AIDS? OK, technically, he was pretty much just a limelight grabber. The heavy lifting was done by a Dr. Luc Montagnier, who later earned a Nobel Prize for his work.

Remember when Luc Montagnier first looked at the covid situation and said it looked like someone took a SARS virus and inserted an AIDS gene at what is known as a furin cleavage site? Well... he died a couple months after attesting to that. We have since learned that the vaxx for the covid seems to wreak havoc on the immune system, but only if the information makes it past The Ministry of Truth. He died in February, 2022.

Remember when Kary B Mullis, the Nobel Prize winner for inventing the PCR test, said Dr Fauci was a fraud in 1996? He also explained that the PCR could magnify viral fragments, and frankly just about anything, but not identify whether they were active infections? He died in August, 2019 of a sudden pneumonia.

Remember when the German police kidnapped Reiner Fuellmich in Mexico on October 13, 2023? He is the lawyer and spokesman for the Corona Investigative Committee, that wanted to institude a Nuremberg 2.0 trial over misuse of the PCR test for the covid against Germany, Fauci, et al. Seems the Germans don't want to land in another Nuremberg trail as the last one didn't go so swell for them.

Remember that whole, we are tired of the covid and just ain't buying the tyranny you're selling anymore? But then they said Beware Ye Olde Monkypox, which nobody have ever heard of before and some limited number of souls rushed out to get the new fangled Monkeypox vaxx. Mainly those souls were part of the gay community who seemed most at risk of contracting it. You may recall seeing prividers on these here forums providing their Monkeypox vaxx status.

But rest assured, it was gonna be a world ending and record breaking disease - and then it wasn't.

We now know...

New Congressional Report Exposes Dr. Fauci’s Department for Concealing Plans to Engineer Mutant Monkeypox Virus, Risking Another Global Pandemic
by Jim Hᴏft Jun. 12, 2024

A new congressional report has uncovered disturbing details about a research project conducted at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Daily Mail reported.

The investigation, spanning over 18 months, revealed a pattern of obstruction and misinformation by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the NIH, and NIAID regarding the transfer of genes between different strains of the Monkeypox virus.

Here is the timeline of the investigation:

• June 30, 2015:** NIAID IBC approves a bidirectional MPXV experiment.
• January 9, 2017:** GOFR/OC pause lifted, HHS P3CO established.
• August 4, 2022:** MPOX Public Health Emergency declared.
• September 15, 2022:** Moss tells Science about clade I to clade II experiment.
• October 10, 2022:** Science article about scientists’ concerns with Moss experiment.
• February 8, 2023:** E&C Republicans hold hearing with Acting NIH Director Dr. Larry Tabak.
• March 30, 2023:** E&C Republicans send second letter to NIH.
• April 26, 2023:** HHS letter erroneously denies experiments were formally proposed and approved.
• May 2023:** Federal select agent approval for clade I to clade II experiment is revoked.
• May 30, 2023:** E&C Republicans send third letter to NIH.
• June 22, 2023:** HHS sends letter to STAT denying that Moss formally proposed experiment.
• June 30, 2023:** HHS letter with misleading statements on experiment from Moss & others.
• July 21, 2023:** E&C Republicans send fourth letter to NIH.
• September 21, 2023:** Bipartisan staff meet with Moss & others.
• October 21, 2023:** E&C Republicans send fifth letter to NIH.
• March 19, 2024:** Bipartisan Committee staff review documents in camera.
• May 6, 2024:** OSTP issues new guidance on DURC/GOFR/OC.

According to the report, spearheaded by the Republican members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, NIAID scientists were found to have transferred genes between different clades of the Monkeypox virus, potentially enhancing its lethality and transmissibility.

According to the interim report:

The proposal to transfer genes from the deadlier clade I into the more transmissible clade II alarmed some scientists who believed a more potent version of the mpox outbreak strain could spark an epidemic that would be substantially more lethal.
[…]
In multiple letters and other communications, HHS and the NIH repeatedly told the Committee the most dangerous MPXV experiments had not been “formally proposed” or “planned,” had never been approved or conducted, and were not currently under consideration. The NIH also issued public statements making the same assertion and even forced Science magazine to issue a clarification for one article on the experiment...

So the poll question is:
What sentence should Dr Anthony Fauci receive for his crimes against humanity?

1. Hanging
2. Firing squad
3. Life, no parole
4. Other, much more ghastly means
5. None, Because... We will get fooled again and again and again

[gladi8r]

I almost didn't respond to this, thinking that this thread may very well die a quick death as no one would actually pay attention to this endless stream-of-consciousness tirade. But one part stands out...

Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

...
Remember when Kary B Mullis, the Nobel Prize winner for inventing the PCR test, said Dr Fauci was a fraud in 1996? He also explained that the PCR could magnify viral fragments, and frankly just about anything, but not identify whether they were active infections? He died in August, 2019 of a sudden pneumonia.

Remember when... Kary B Mullis, the Nobel Prize winner for inventing the PCR test, said that humans weren't responsible for climate change or ozone depletion? Remember when he was called a "Psuedo Scientist" for his quickly debunked theories casting doubt on HIV as a cause of AIDS?

REMEMBER WHEN...the Skeptical Inquirer said his "statements on HIV/AIDS and human-caused climate change are an instance of "Nobel disease", i.e. the tendency of some Nobel laureates to go on to embrace ideas that are scientifically implausible, rejected by most scientific experts, and based mostly on anecdotal or uncorroborated evidence.[7]" (that quote and credit is from Wikipedia, but I'm already too tired of this to re-reference here)

I love that second one, though!

Because I....REMEMBER WHEN... William Shockley, who received the Nobel for his work on the transistor effect, proceeded to destroy his reputation by becoming a eugenicist and "race theorist", though he had no degree or credentials in genetics.

But the real worst part of your post is that you are promoting violence against a public official. And using a great tune by the Who to promote this. Inexcusable. Pete Townshend may not be the most stable or admirable person out there, but I think he would strongly disapprove of any association with this, including your suggestions of violence.

I don't think I have ever reported a post on this board. But I will make an exception in your case, for your promotion of violence. I assume you will defend it, saying you were not serious. It doesn't matter. This needs to end.

[gladi8r]

Friendly advice to other members: you probably don't want to be associated with this pool. Or any other threats of violence, even if intended in jest.

[eccieuser9500]

How can I remember something that hasn't happened?

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Ya might outta look up the word jurisprudence. Sentencing occurs after being found guilty by a jury of your peers and occurs in a court of law, be it in the USA, USA, USA or world court, such as Nuremberg - which seems more appropriate for this level of mass murder.

Originally Posted by gladi8r

Friendly advice to other members: you probably don't want to be associated with this pool. Or any other threats of violence, even if intended in jest.

[royamcr]

Daily Mail....

Questionable Reasoning: Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Newspaper
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

[Jackie S]

Fauci should be indicted, tried, and if convicted, get the appropriate sentence.

Then perhaps they can uncover his Swiss bank accounts where the ChiComs deposited his bribes.

[royamcr]

Fauci is being villified to cover up Trump's ignorance, stupidity and total fuck up regarding covid.

[gladi8r]

Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Ya might outta look up the word jurisprudence. Sentencing occurs after being found guilty by a jury of your peers and occurs in a court of law, be it in the USA, USA, USA or world court, such as Nuremberg - which seems more appropriate for this level of mass murder.

I was waiting for you to look it up for us in "American Heritage."

What does "sentencing" have to do with your implied threat of violence? This is your usual misdirection.

I want you to justify/defend your implication of threat of violence by creating this post. Now. The next time you post.

[biomed1]

To Remain on Topic . . .

#6 - Respect the topics presented by those who start a thread. Attempts to derail a thread or change it's direction is referred to as thread hijack and will be discouraged. Attempts to guide a thread in the right direction are appreciated, while responses to posts which hijack a thread are not.

[Levianon17]

Kary Mullis knew Fauci was a fraud twenty eight years ago, lol.

[gladi8r]

Originally Posted by biomed1

To Remain on Topic . . .

Respectfully, I'm not seeing the hijacking here. It looks like every post, including mine, talks to the topic of this thread.

I also call your attention to this:

#7 - Threats of violence or physical harm will not be tolerated under any circumstances. There is no place for that on this board

This thread and Poll should be terminated. The OP has posted an implied threat of violence to a public official. He may defend it as an attempt at humor, but this is not right. This board is open to the public and not private, and it places itself at risk by allowing this type of dialog.


.

[biomed1]

You are free to post as you like.
Comply with the Guidelines and the Staff Instructions and Staff will have nothing to do.
Members are like wise reminded of Guideline # 13

#13 - Our moderating staff monitors the forums with the goal of keeping threads on track and on topic. Occasionally we may issue specific instructions or direction to a poster and we ask that you respect those instructions and follow them. Disregarding a moderator's written instruction or repeating a violation for which you have been warned will most certainly result in penalty.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

The thread should survive. You? Not so much. Real classy trying to trash a dead surfer dude in an entirely off-topic jab. So what if he was a fan-boi of Timothy Leary's October 25th works? Which you likely do not know about either.

Fact is: Mullis died in August 2019. Had he been alive on or after January 21, 2020, the world would have been very different as the surfer dude would have shredded the bejesus out of some quacks (as evidenced in the supplied videos) on January 21st, 2020 and saved most of us from the fraud committed on that date by a handful of azz-hats that said the PCR test would show the covid. It wasn't until November 2020 that the paper was finally peer reviewed and found to be fatally flawed, practically malpractice. Mullis would have ended it on day 1, being the world's foremost expert on PCR, which is what was stated

Learn to discern what the thread topic is and stay within the guard rails of it.Your first instinct might have been your salvation. Go with your gut. I would make no exception on you. Hope you like the ending...

Originally Posted by gladi8r

I almost didn't respond to this, thinking that this thread may very well die a quick death as no one would actually pay attention to this endless stream-of-consciousness tirade. But one part stands out...



Remember when... Kary B Mullis, the Nobel Prize winner for inventing the PCR test, said that humans weren't responsible for climate change or ozone depletion? Remember when he was called a "Psuedo Scientist" for his quickly debunked theories casting doubt on HIV as a cause of AIDS?

REMEMBER WHEN...the Skeptical Inquirer said his "statements on HIV/AIDS and human-caused climate change are an instance of "Nobel disease", i.e. the tendency of some Nobel laureates to go on to embrace ideas that are scientifically implausible, rejected by most scientific experts, and based mostly on anecdotal or uncorroborated evidence.[7]" (that quote and credit is from Wikipedia, but I'm already too tired of this to re-reference here)

I love that second one, though!

Because I....REMEMBER WHEN... William Shockley, who received the Nobel for his work on the transistor effect, proceeded to destroy his reputation by becoming a eugenicist and "race theorist", though he had no degree or credentials in genetics.

But the real worst part of your post is that you are promoting violence against a public official. And using a great tune by the Who to promote this. Inexcusable. Pete Townshend may not be the most stable or admirable person out there, but I think he would strongly disapprove of any association with this, including your suggestions of violence.

I don't think I have ever reported a post on this board. But I will make an exception in your case, for your promotion of violence. I assume you will defend it, saying you were not serious. It doesn't matter. This needs to end.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

How can I remember something that hasn't happened?

Time travel, game theory, using your head for more than a hat rack.