Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 398
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 283
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70819
biomed163628
Yssup Rider61219
gman4453334
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48791
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43193
The_Waco_Kid37390
CryptKicker37228
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-03-2023, 11:23 PM   #1
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 10,267
Default They're GONE!

... How 'bout THIS, mates -

The "J6" witness depositions - they're GONE!

Rep. Barry Loudermilk (GA) was talking about it yesterday
that the "J6" investigating body now looks more like
a "cover-up" body... The House Oversight sub-committee
led-by Mr. Loudermilk has mentioned that all of the
videotapes of witness interviews and depositions are GONE.

... And I gotta wonder WHY. ... If the 6th Jan. cover-up
committee destroyed the primary source records there
to hide evidence - then why should the committee
be trusted?? ... Their evidence is missing.

... I surely remember when Trump was on wanna those
news programmes - "Meet the Press" or whatever,
and He had a barney with Kristen Welker about this
and why the "J6" committee wouldn't even interview
Nancy Pelosi about Trump offouring Pelosi 10,000
soldiers for the Capitol and Pelosi turned him down.

Trump also brought up that the "J6" committee
destroyed evidence records and what-not and Welker
said nothing was destroyed.

... And HERE we are today! ... Once again - Trump is correct.

#### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 12:19 AM   #2
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,219
Encounters: 67
Default

Where did you read that, Salty?
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 12:38 AM   #3
VitaMan
Valued Poster
 
VitaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 27, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 10,525
Encounters: 70
Default

Fact Check: Did Pelosi Reject Trump’s Request for National Guard Troops on January 6?


In Trump’s words: “I requested … I definitely gave the number of 10,000 National Guardsmen, and [said] I think you should have 10,000 of the National Guard ready. They took that number. From what I understand, they gave it to the people at the Capitol, which is controlled by Pelosi. And I heard they rejected it because they didn’t think it would look good. So, you know, that was a big mistake.”


Josh Huder, a senior fellow at Georgetown University’s Government Affairs Institute,advises that “the speaker does not have control of any branch of the armed services.”


“The National Guard can only be activated by the president or a governor,” Huder added. “In the case of D.C., it can only be mobilized by the president of the United States.”


Trump gave no order to deploy the National Guard that day, and made no effort to work with the Department of Justice to coordinate and deploy law enforcement assets.
VitaMan is offline   Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 12:52 AM   #4
VitaMan
Valued Poster
 
VitaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 27, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 10,525
Encounters: 70
Default

Fact check: No evidence January 6 committee destroyed records, contrary to online claims

The Republican congressman overseeing the investigation into the committee’s work has not said any records were destroyed, and there have been no reputable reports of such destruction. What Rep. Barry Loudermilk of Georgia did say is that some video recordings are missing, and he does not know what happened to them.

The issue centers on the whereabouts of interviews and depositions from the committee’s investigation into the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Loudermilk wrote that some recordings were not archived or transferred to the Committee on House Administration. Written transcripts of them were provided, however.
VitaMan is offline   Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 12:57 AM   #5
VitaMan
Valued Poster
 
VitaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 27, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 10,525
Encounters: 70
Default

.. And HERE we are today! ... Once again - Trump is correct.

#### Salty



Salty owes an apology to the entire viewership of this website for constantly posting false or unproven information.
VitaMan is offline   Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 07:49 AM   #6
SpeedRacerXXX
Valued Poster
 
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: Georgetown, Texas
Posts: 9,330
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaMan View Post
.. And HERE we are today! ... Once again - Trump is correct.

#### Salty



Salty owes an apology to the entire viewership of this website for constantly posting false or unproven information.
At least he's consistent.
SpeedRacerXXX is offline   Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 11:13 AM   #7
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,219
Encounters: 67
Default

One has to wonder what type of enterprise is at work here.

No one person could be so wrong on everything every time.

Call that a conspiracy theory if you like, but it makes sense. The endless unfounded claimed made by the poster know.n as Salty may in fact be the work of a whole think tank…

NAAHHHHH!


Hahahahahahahahahahau
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 03:11 PM   #8
Tigbitties38
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 23, 2022
Location: Houston
Posts: 652
Default

Das vadanya, comrade.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again View Post
... How 'bout THIS, mates -

The "J6" witness depositions - they're GONE!

Rep. Barry Loudermilk (GA) was talking about it yesterday
that the "J6" investigating body now looks more like
a "cover-up" body... The House Oversight sub-committee
led-by Mr. Loudermilk has mentioned that all of the
videotapes of witness interviews and depositions are GONE.

... And I gotta wonder WHY. ... If the 6th Jan. cover-up
committee destroyed the primary source records there
to hide evidence - then why should the committee
be trusted?? ... Their evidence is missing.

... I surely remember when Trump was on wanna those
news programmes - "Meet the Press" or whatever,
and He had a barney with Kristen Welker about this
and why the "J6" committee wouldn't even interview
Nancy Pelosi about Trump offouring Pelosi 10,000
soldiers for the Capitol and Pelosi turned him down.

Trump also brought up that the "J6" committee
destroyed evidence records and what-not and Welker
said nothing was destroyed.

... And HERE we are today! ... Once again - Trump is correct.

#### Salty
Tigbitties38 is offline   Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 04:39 PM   #9
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 10,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaMan View Post
Fact Check: Did Pelosi Reject Trump’s Request for National Guard Troops on January 6?


In Trump’s words: “I requested … I definitely gave the number of 10,000 National Guardsmen, and [said] I think you should have 10,000 of the National Guard ready. They took that number. From what I understand, they gave it to the people at the Capitol, which is controlled by Pelosi. And I heard they rejected it because they didn’t think it would look good. So, you know, that was a big mistake.”


Josh Huder, a senior fellow at Georgetown University’s Government Affairs Institute,advises that “the speaker does not have control of any branch of the armed services.”


“The National Guard can only be activated by the president or a governor,” Huder added. “In the case of D.C., it can only be mobilized by the president of the United States.”


Trump gave no order to deploy the National Guard that day, and made no effort to work with the Department of Justice to coordinate and deploy law enforcement assets.

... This your "Fact Check"?? ...

By a George Washington universty fellow? ... How nice.

Too right that onley the President and/or a Governour
can mobilise (order) the Nat'nl Guard - which is why
President Trump offoured the troops to Nancy Pelosi
days BEFORE 6 January... To then have them there to
help with crowd and traffic control come that day.

And Nancy Pelosi turned it down.

... I aslo see yer fellow there mention that Trump
gave no order to deploy THAT DAY (6 Jan)
- correct - because He already offoured the troops
in-advance, as I mentioned - and both Pelosi
and the DC Mayour didn't want them.

... So that's that.

#### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 04:52 PM   #10
VitaMan
Valued Poster
 
VitaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 27, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 10,525
Encounters: 70
Default

Completely wrong Salty.

It is not possible for a speaker to
"turn them down". The speaker has no control over any armed services. The speaker could not turn them down even if the speaker wanted to.

Can you understand that now ?

Only the President can authorize use of the National Guard in DC. Trump did not do that.

So that is actually that.

If your thought process is followed, the President could authorize use of the National Guard....the speaker could say they don't want them...then who would be in charge of the armed forces....it would be the speaker, not the President.

You are looking a little ridiculous here Salty.
VitaMan is offline   Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 05:07 PM   #11
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 10,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaMan View Post
Fact check: No evidence January 6 committee destroyed records, contrary to online claims

The Republican congressman overseeing the investigation into the committee’s work has not said any records were destroyed, and there have been no reputable reports of such destruction. What Rep. Barry Loudermilk of Georgia did say is that some video recordings are missing, and he does not know what happened to them.

The issue centers on the whereabouts of interviews and depositions from the committee’s investigation into the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Loudermilk wrote that some recordings were not archived or transferred to the Committee on House Administration. Written transcripts of them were provided, however.
... Mr. Loudermilk didn't say the video-recordings
were destroyed - he said that they are MISSING.

... I am wondering IF they were destroyed.

... And in addition to some transcripts being provided,
just not yet some of the ones asked-for - there WAS
one such item - that surely caught the attention of
BOTH Mr. Loudermilk AND Alan Dershowitz.

The errata sheet of Cassidy Hutchenson.

... No doubt you fellows remember her - the Trump aide
that told the world that President Trump DEMANDED
that the secret service drive him to the Capitol
after his 6th January speech. And when the secret service
refused - Trump grabbed the steering wheel with one hand
and the neck of one of the agents with the other!

And the interesting thing about Cassidy's 15 page-long
errata sheet is that it's been updated. And has significant
CHANGES made to her earlier accounte of key events in
the Capitol riot drama. ... Her digital signature there
is dated 12 September 2022.

... Might these changes be because the Republicans
were surely expected to WIN the House - and therefore
might do a "J6" investigation of their-own?

... Now Loudermilk and Alan Dershowitz understand that
these testimony changes are NOT merely corrections
- but actual Material changes to her original storys.

Which makes it entirely NEW testimony - that should be
subject to cross-examination.

... And it just may be - IF the House Oversight decides
to launch a good investigation of the "J6 committee"
and their findings.

Perhaps the recordings that are GONE will be found by then.

#### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 05:11 PM   #12
VitaMan
Valued Poster
 
VitaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 27, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 10,525
Encounters: 70
Default

The fact that Trump is still screaming to this day about Massive election fraud....after more than 60 frivolous lawsuits which were thrown out...is not helping you, Salty.

Your 2 original findings have been fact checked. They both are incorrect.
VitaMan is offline   Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 05:43 PM   #13
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 10,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaMan View Post
Completely wrong Salty.

It is not possible for a speaker to
"turn them down". The speaker has no control over any armed services. The speaker could not turn them down even if the speaker wanted to.

Can you understand that now ?

Only the President can authorize use of the National Guard in DC. Trump did not do that.

So that is actually that.

If your thought process is followed, the President could authorize use of the National Guard....the speaker could say they don't want them...then who would be in charge of the armed forces....it would be the speaker, not the President.

You are looking a little ridiculous here Salty.
... Bullshit there, mate... You'll find this out
once Nancy Pelosi is questioned.
The "J6" had NO QUESTIONS for her on this.

... So are YOU claiming that Trump is LYING about this issue??

... Answer and we'll start a new thread if need be.
I don't wanna to change the point of this one.

#### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 06:42 PM   #14
VitaMan
Valued Poster
 
VitaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 27, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 10,525
Encounters: 70
Default

You would need to prove Trump is not lying. That's your style of discussion.


Do you think Mr. Trump, with his bully personality, was ready to send National Guard troops. But he thought "Oh, I better not do that. Nancy said not to."


Mr Trump has no other input to his decision making besides Nancy ?


The fact is Mr. Trump did not authorize National Guard troops. The next question is, should he have done that ? He is the only one that could have. Was this another error in judgement by Trump ?
VitaMan is offline   Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 07:23 PM   #15
Tigbitties38
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 23, 2022
Location: Houston
Posts: 652
Default

Point this guy and leave the thread open. He is trying to hide his shame.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again View Post
... Bullshit there, mate... You'll find this out
once Nancy Pelosi is questioned.
The "J6" had NO QUESTIONS for her on this.

... So are YOU claiming that Trump is LYING about this issue??

... Answer and we'll start a new thread if need be.
I don't wanna to change the point of this one.

#### Salty
Tigbitties38 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved