SCOTUS sides with Texas!!!

[bambino]

Huge win!

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-...administration.

[winn dixie]

Lol
I'm IN TEXAS!

It's a temporary ruling at best!

[bambino]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

Lol
I'm IN TEXAS!

It's a temporary ruling at best!

And you should stay there. Yeah, they can fight it out in lower courts. But SCOTUS will have the final say and it’s where they’re at. But say Laken Riley five times soldier.

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by bambino

And you should stay there. Didn’t say it was “temporary” but say Laken Riley five times soldier.

Lolling

Do you even realize what the courts ruling was about? Today's ruling is limited.

[bambino]

Yes I do;

WASHINGTON, March 19 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday let a Republican-backed Texas law take effect that allows state law enforcement authorities to arrest people suspected of illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, rejecting a bid to block it by President Joe Biden's administration.
The court has a 6-3 conservative majority, and its three liberal justices dissented, saying Tuesday's action turns immigration enforcement - typically the province of the federal government - on its head

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by bambino

Yes I do;

WASHINGTON, March 19 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday let a Republican-backed Texas law take effect that allows state law enforcement authorities to arrest people suspected of illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, rejecting a bid to block it by President Joe Biden's administration.
The court has a 6-3 conservative majority, and its three liberal justices dissented, saying Tuesday's action turns immigration enforcement - typically the province of the federal government - on its head

Sir the ruling today is very limited in scope. It does not address the many other legal questions and problems concerning the entire underlying issue. As you'll see being argued already in courts.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

Sir the ruling today is very limited in scope. It does not address the many other legal questions and problems concerning the entire underlying issue. As you'll see being argued already in courts.

How so? Sir!!!

[tommy156]

The Federal appeals court already blocked SB 4 again. Take that, SCOTUS.



https://www.texastribune.org/2024/03...l-immigration/

[winn dixie]

Well there's that ^^^^^^^^^^^^

This could be fought for a long time in many courts. Not a win at all.

[Yssup Rider]

No way will Texas win this. The precedent alone is enough to officially empower state militia to patrol the streets.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

No way will Texas win this. The precedent alone is enough to officially empower state militia to patrol the streets.

... Too Right! ... "POWER to the People! ...

#### Salty

[Jacuzzme]

I can’t wrap my head around someone being gleeful that law enforcement is disallowed from stopping foreigners from illegally entering the country. WTF is wrong with you people?

[bambino]

Originally Posted by tommy156

The Federal appeals court already blocked SB 4 again. Take that, SCOTUS.



https://www.texastribune.org/2024/03...l-immigration/

Yeah, but the 5th Circuit will rule today! N
The 5th Circuit court has scheduled oral arguments for 10am CT (15:00 GMT) on Wednesday on whether to block the law. According to local media reports, the appeals court is expected to continue to hold arguments next month on whether the law is unconstitutional and should be blocked indefinitely.


LOLLing

[Yssup Rider]

It was a false win, fellas. Abbott’s thugs are not empowered to make immigration policy.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

It was a false win, fellas. Abbott’s thugs are not empowered to make immigration policy.

Thugs? For protecting people in Texas like you from a criminal invasion? It’s a moot point because the Emperor Trump will be back in office soon and shut this travesty down.