Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
Yes, the head of the EPA is a black man and it seems that only person doing their job. The democrats (and media) have barely mentioned him in their reports. When they do, 2/3s of the time, he is referred to by his title and not by name. A black man with a Master's Degree, you'd think that the democrats would want to carve his face on Mount Rushmore. Fear? Race? He makes Joe and Pete look bad?
|
I like where this is going, I must say. But, why do you think the party is "opposed" to him? Any video or written pieces? Or is it just your assessment of the lack of "
propping" him up?
One might think the party would parlé this (and I'm no seasoned gambler) into more than just a photo opportunity. But then, of course, the likes of the FOXhole forever crowd would be up in arms about the career opportunism. Fucked if you do and fucked if you don't.
Still, I'm with you. Maybe take the "opportunity" to overshadow Pete?
Why are the democrats opposed to Michael Regan?
