Quote:
Originally Posted by Redhot1960
Exposers of the truth are not a "thief", family be damned. Their son was a stand up guy!!! A REAL HERO!
 |
you steal someone's property. what does that make them?
I read some of the comments from people who were following Seth's case much more closely.
apparently the family knew Seth stole the data which was put on a thumb drive and there's the business of the lawsuit against Hannity to force him to stop the Seth Rich coverage.
wtd says:
July 16, 2019 at 12:45 pm
1) “On December 17, 2016, at the instigation of Ms. Rattner, Mr. Butowsky finally contacted Joel and Mary Rich, the parents of Seth, and he relayed the information about Ms. Rattner’s meeting with Mr. Assange…”
2) ”During that conversation, Mr. Rich told Mr. Butowsky that he already knew that his sons were involved in the DNC email leak, but he and his wife just wanted to know who murdered Seth…”
3) “Mr. Rich said he was reluctant to go public with Seth’s and Aaron’s role in leaking the emails because ‘we don’t want anyone to think our sons were responsible for getting Trump elected.’”
Wait…WHAT?
4) I pray Mr. Rich was lying about this, and the real reason was he feared for the rest of his family’s lives.
If not, “we don’t want anyone to think our sons were responsible for getting Trump elected” is an absolutely abhorrent thing for a parent of a murdered child to say.
5) I don’t care what your political beliefs are. If your son is murdered in cold blood, that goes out the window. You should do everything you can to help catch their killer. That starts by shedding light on the situation, which leads to motives & suspects.
This makes me sick.
a poster made a very interesting and valid theory who the Russians were really helping; it was Sanders, not Hillary. the plotting didn't work out.
Hal_S (@schirmer_h) says:
July 16, 2019 at 2:17 pm
Here’s what DOES make sense.
1) Russian scammers WERE using the internet to access in the DNC/DCCC system to steal donor data and redirect donations.
2) Someone was copying damaging DNC emails to a thumb drive.
3) After 1&2 were discovered, Guccifer 2.0 appeared and seemed focused on the attribution for 1&2.
1) The “Russian scammers” who did infiltrate the DNC computers sought out information about the DNC finance system, the donor list,
AND registered “sound-alike” domains to the DNC’s online donation page, AND hacked the DNC/DCCC websites to redirect to their fake donation sites.
https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress...cc-hacked.html.
Looking for SSN, and credit card data and spoofing donation sites indicate they were talented thieves, not spies.
2) The WikiLeaks emails have metadata indicating they were copied by USB 2.0 onto a FAT32 formatted drive. They focus on damaging information about the DNC rigging the primary against Bernie Sanders.
3) G2 never released any damaging information, only claimed attribution for previously released information. Example, G2’s first offer of proof about hacking was to post “stolen” DNC files which were basically ~”100 Reasons why Trump sucks and you should vote for Hilary”.
That’s NOT the route that an actual anti-Clinton hacker would take.
PS
Logically, of the frontrunners; Clinton, Sanders, and Trump; Russia would prefer President Sanders, the socialist candidate. I think it’s MORE likely that assuming the Russian Govt. did have a “favorite”: it was Bernie. The purpose of the DNC leaks would be to HURT Clinton in the primary and HELP Sanders so that Sanders would be the Democratic nominee. Then the Russians would turn to try to HURT Trump and HELP Sanders.
another poster thinks that there was a russian mole in the DNC. Was Seth a Russian mole?
Luke Rosiak interview on The Epoch Times
