Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 278
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163220
Yssup Rider60919
gman4453294
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48646
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42564
CryptKicker37215
The_Waco_Kid36980
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-27-2015, 06:45 AM   #1
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default IRAN BOMBSHELL - TEAM OBAMA NEGOTIATING DEAL THAT CAN'T BE VERIFIED

The WSJ and AP are reporting:
"..that United States is considering letting Tehran run hundreds of centrifuges at a once-secret, fortified underground bunker in exchange for limits on centrifuge work and research and development at other sites. Allowing the Iranians to enrich at Fordow means they could kick out inspectors at any time and have a fully-functioning enrichment facility hardened against military intervention. Since sanctions will be unraveled by design at the beginning of a deal, that means the West would have literally zero options to stop a breakout. The administration’s early pushback is that the breakout time will still be a year, so they could in theory reimpose sanctions, but it takes more than a year for sanctions to take an economic toll. So: zero options to stop a breakout..."
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireS...-site-29925489

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...talls+un+probe
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 03-27-2015, 07:29 AM   #2
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

If Team Obama can't negotiate fair POW swap, how can he be expected to negotiate a fair nuclear deal? I'm reading where this may be a "handshake agreement." Calm down, Austin Reacharound Crew.

gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 03-27-2015, 07:35 AM   #3
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly View Post
If Team Obama can't negotiate fair POW swap, how can he be expected to negotiate a fair nuclear deal? I'm reading where this may be a "handshake agreement." Calm down, Austin Reacharound Crew.

Which hand?

Not to worry. The Israelis are working on "the issue"!
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 03-27-2015, 07:37 AM   #4
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

HAHAHA............

Gnadfly..........you have got one helluva wit.




Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly View Post
If Team Obama can't negotiate fair POW swap, how can he be expected to negotiate a fair nuclear deal? I'm reading where this may be a "handshake agreement." Calm down, Austin Reacharound Crew.

Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 03-27-2015, 08:22 AM   #5
timpage
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 7, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
The WSJ and AP are reporting:
"..that United States is considering letting Tehran run hundreds of centrifuges at a once-secret, fortified underground bunker in exchange for limits on centrifuge work and research and development at other sites. Allowing the Iranians to enrich at Fordow means they could kick out inspectors at any time and have a fully-functioning enrichment facility hardened against military intervention. Since sanctions will be unraveled by design at the beginning of a deal, that means the West would have literally zero options to stop a breakout. The administration’s early pushback is that the breakout time will still be a year, so they could in theory reimpose sanctions, but it takes more than a year for sanctions to take an economic toll. So: zero options to stop a breakout..."
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireS...-site-29925489

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...talls+un+probe

Fucking idiot. From your link:

>>>>>The trade-off would allow Iran to run several hundred of the devices at its Fordo facility, although the Iranians would not be allowed to do work that could lead to an atomic bomb and the site would be subject to international inspections, according to Western officials familiar with details of negotiations now underway. In return, Iran would be required to scale back the number of centrifuges it runs at its Natanz facility and accept other restrictions on nuclear-related work.
timpage is offline   Quote
Old 03-27-2015, 08:39 AM   #6
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default

It all comes down to one simple item. Do you trust the Iranians?
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 03-27-2015, 08:40 AM   #7
DSK
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 8,050
Encounters: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timpage View Post
Fucking idiot. From your link:

>>>>>The trade-off would allow Iran to run several hundred of the devices at its Fordo facility, although the Iranians would not be allowed to do work that could lead to an atomic bomb and the site would be subject to international inspections, according to Western officials familiar with details of negotiations now underway. In return, Iran would be required to scale back the number of centrifuges it runs at its Natanz facility and accept other restrictions on nuclear-related work.
Probably the best deal we are going to get. I doubt anyone else could do better.
DSK is offline   Quote
Old 03-27-2015, 09:05 AM   #8
nevergaveitathought
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DSK View Post
Probably the best deal we are going to get. I doubt anyone else could do better.
im having trouble with that logic

what brought the Iranian's to the table to begin with?

was it the sanctions and the freezing of assets and the inability for its banks to operate in world commerce?

im thinking that is what got them to negotiate

so they negotiate a deal that stops the sanctions

if either over time as an open consequence of the deal or because they think they can surreptitiously continue with their intentions how is that a "best" deal anyone could get

it would be far better to tighten the sanction screws and have no deal than a bad deal
nevergaveitathought is offline   Quote
Old 03-27-2015, 09:34 AM   #9
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default FROM THE WSJ.........WITH SANCTIONS LIFTED, WHY WOULD TEHRAN COME CLEAN?

It doesn't get any clearer; Tehran won't immediately come clean on it's past/existing programs which are critical to reliable inspections going forward. BUT sanctions get lifted almost immediately:

The ability of the IAEA and global powers to verify whether Iran is abiding by any future deal to prevent it from racing to develop a nuclear weapon depends, in part, on an understanding of its past work, according to these officials.

Under the new plan, Tehran wouldn’t be expected to immediately clarify all the outstanding questions raised by the IAEA in a 2011 report on Iran’s alleged secretive work. A full reckoning of Iran’s past activities would be demanded in later years as part of a nuclear deal that is expected to last at least 15 years.




Quote:
Originally Posted by timpage View Post
Fucking idiot. From your link:

>>>>>The trade-off would allow Iran to run several hundred of the devices at its Fordo facility, although the Iranians would not be allowed to do work that could lead to an atomic bomb and the site SHOULD would be subject to international inspections, according to Western officials familiar with details of negotiations now underway. In return, Iran would be required to scale back the number of centrifuges it runs at its Natanz facility and accept other restrictions on nuclear-related work.
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 03-27-2015, 09:42 AM   #10
UnderConstruction
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,378
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought View Post
im having trouble with that logic

what brought the Iranian's to the table to begin with?

was it the sanctions and the freezing of assets and the inability for its banks to operate in world commerce?

im thinking that is what got them to negotiate

so they negotiate a deal that stops the sanctions

if either over time as an open consequence of the deal or because they think they can surreptitiously continue with their intentions how is that a "best" deal anyone could get

it would be far better to tighten the sanction screws and have no deal than a bad deal
It would? Let's play that out to it's logical conclusion. Let's go ahead and turn those sanction screws tighter, as you prescribe. They will have no oversight now. No inspectors or monitoring of ANY kind. The russians will continue to give them nuclear materials because they take any chance they can to poke us in the eye. They continue to expand their program. And instead of us having at least a clue of what is going on, we are on the outside looking in. How doest that put us in any better position than we are in now? IF they devise a bomb and test it, that will be the first we'll know of it. Sounds AWESOME.
UnderConstruction is offline   Quote
Old 03-27-2015, 09:50 AM   #11
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

Ok...I will play your game.....let's tighten the economic screws like you opine. Let's keep their oil out of the world supply. Let's stop all trade.

And see how long the Mullahs hang on to their power before the decent Iranians say "enough" with our nuclear ambitions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderConstruction View Post
It would? Let's play that out to it's logical conclusion. Let's go ahead and turn those sanction screws tighter, as you prescribe. They will have no oversight now. No inspectors or monitoring of ANY kind. The russians will continue to give them nuclear materials because they take any chance they can to poke us in the eye. They continue to expand their program. And instead of us having at least a clue of what is going on, we are on the outside looking in. How doest that put us in any better position than we are in now? IF they devise a bomb and test it, that will be the first we'll know of it. Sounds AWESOME.
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 03-27-2015, 10:40 AM   #12
nevergaveitathought
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderConstruction View Post
It would? Let's play that out to it's logical conclusion. Let's go ahead and turn those sanction screws tighter, as you prescribe. They will have no oversight now. No inspectors or monitoring of ANY kind. The russians will continue to give them nuclear materials because they take any chance they can to poke us in the eye. They continue to expand their program. And instead of us having at least a clue of what is going on, we are on the outside looking in. How doest that put us in any better position than we are in now? IF they devise a bomb and test it, that will be the first we'll know of it. Sounds AWESOME.
and this is the only logical conclusion?

that's quite illogical of you

how about we deal from strength not weakness

the fear is with this agreement they continue to expand their program

how about the logical conclusion sanctions and our strength works?

how is it not logical to consider that sanctions are what got us this far?
nevergaveitathought is offline   Quote
Old 03-27-2015, 12:07 PM   #13
timpage
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 7, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought View Post
and this is the only logical conclusion?

that's quite illogical of you

how about we deal from strength not weakness

the fear is with this agreement they continue to expand their program

how about the logical conclusion sanctions and our strength works?

how is it not logical to consider that sanctions are what got us this far?
Yeah, those sanctions we put in place on Cuba for 50 plus years sure worked well. And Robert Mugabe is certainly on the ropes after 30 some odd years of sanctions.

Sanctions aren't going to work. They rarely, if ever, do.
timpage is offline   Quote
Old 03-27-2015, 12:25 PM   #14
nevergaveitathought
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
Default

the sunni saudi's want nukes to offset the iran shia's coming nukes

seems that's how they see how this negotiation is going and that seems to be what they think about it

"Saudi Arabia will not rule out building or acquiring nuclear weapons, the country’s ambassador to the United States has indicated.

In 2012 the Saudi Arabian government threatened to acquire nuclear weapons were neighbouring regional power Iran ever to do so.

“Politically, it would be completely unacceptable to have Iran with a nuclear capability and not the kingdom,” a senior Saudi source told The Times newspaper at the time."
nevergaveitathought is offline   Quote
Old 03-27-2015, 12:29 PM   #15
nevergaveitathought
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timpage View Post
Yeah, those sanctions we put in place on Cuba for 50 plus years sure worked well. And Robert Mugabe is certainly on the ropes after 30 some odd years of sanctions.

Sanctions aren't going to work. They rarely, if ever, do.
yeah but the point is its still better than a bad deal
nevergaveitathought is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved